Visual Attention to Wayfinding Aids in Virtual Environments

In an empirical evaluation, we examined participants' visual attention allocation to a dynamic wayfinding map in a complex simulation meant to educate medical practitioners in a hand hygiene protocol. Complex virtual environments (VEs) are novel types of virtual worlds that embody large spaces, interactive virtual humans, static and dynamic virtual entities, and intricate tasks that simulate real-world settings. Previous investigations of wayfinding aids have focused on the evaluation of spatial orientation, knowledge acquisition, and usage. We employed an eye tracker and created visualization tools to quantitatively and qualitatively analyze participants' visual attention to the wayfinding aid in our simulation. Results suggest that the proportion of time of gaze, total gaze count, and gaze transitions between various elements of the VE are altered with the use of the wayfinding aid. Participants also tend to employ innovative visual strategies in order to efficiently plan routes and accomplish tasks in the VE.

[1]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of Wayfinding Aids in Virtual Environment , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC / SHEA / APIC / IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force , 2002 .

[3]  Rudy Darken,et al.  Map usage in virtual environments: orientation issues , 1999, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality (Cat. No. 99CB36316).

[4]  Donald H. House,et al.  Measuring gaze depth with an eye tracker during stereoscopic display , 2011, APGV '11.

[5]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[6]  P. A. Gorry.  General least-squares smoothing and differentiation by the convolution (Savitzky-Golay) method , 1990 .

[7]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  Comparison of path visualizations and cognitive measures relative to travel technique in a virtual environment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Navigating Buildings in "Desk-Top" Virtual Environments: Experimental Investigations Using Extended Navigational Experience , 1997 .

[9]  Thomas Bernard,et al.  Interpersonal Scenarios: Virtual \approx Real? , 2006, IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006).

[10]  Andrew T. Duchowski,et al.  Comparison of eye movement metrics recorded at different sampling rates , 2012, ETRA.

[11]  Mary Hayhoe,et al.  Gaze patterns in navigation: encoding information in large-scale environments. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[12]  Rudy Darken,et al.  Wayfinding strategies and behaviors in large virtual worlds , 1996, CHI.

[13]  Deepak S. Vembar,et al.  Effect of visual cues on human performance in navigating through a virtual maze , 2004, EGVE.

[14]  Frederick P. Brooks.  What's Real About Virtual Reality? , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[15]  Randy Pausch,et al.  Virtual reality on a WIM: interactive worlds in miniature , 1995, CHI '95.

[16]  Gregory A. Gahm,et al.  Virtual reality exposure therapy for active duty soldiers. , 2008, Journal of clinical psychology.

[17]  Jeffrey W. Bertrand,et al.  An evolving multi-agent scenario generation framework for simulations in preventive medicine education , 2012, IHI '12.

[18]  Daniel C. Cliburn,et al.  Dynamic landmark placement as a navigation aid in virtual worlds , 2007, VRST '07.

[19]  Sabarish V. Babu,et al.  A Virtual Peer for Investigating Social Influences on Children's Bicycling , 2009, 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference.

[20]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Treating Psychological and Physical Disorders with VR , 2022 .

[21]  Martin G. Helander,et al.  Task-Map Coherence for the Design of in-Vehicle Navigation Displays , 1996 .

[22]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  Scaffolded learning with mixed reality , 2009, Comput. Graph..