Wide Twin Binaries are Extremely Eccentric: Evidence of Twin Binary Formation in Circumbinary Disks

The Gaia mission recently revealed an excess population of equal-mass “twin” wide binaries, with mass ratio q ≳ 0.95, extending to separations of at least 1000 au. The origin of this population is an enigma: Twin binaries are thought to form via correlated accretion in circumbinary disks, but the typical observed protostellar disks have radii of ∼100 au, far smaller than the separations of the widest twins. Here, we infer the eccentricity distribution of wide twins from the distribution of their v–r angles, i.e., the angle between the components’ separation and relative velocity vectors. We find that wide twins must be on extremely eccentric orbits. For the excess-twin population at 400–1000 au, we infer a near-delta-function excess of high-eccentricity systems, with eccentricity 0.95 ≲ e ≤ 1. These high eccentricities for wide twins imply pericenter distances of order 10 au and suggest that their orbits were scattered via dynamical interactions in their birth environments, consistent with a scenario in which twins are born in circumbinary disks and subsequently widened. These results further establish twin wide binaries as a distinct population and imply that wide twins can be used as a probe of the dynamical history of stellar populations.

[1]  C. Hamilton On the Phase-mixed Eccentricity and Inclination Distributions of Wide Binaries in the Galaxy , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[2]  N. Zakamska,et al.  Enhancement of Double-Close-Binary Quadruples , 2022, 2202.00021.

[3]  G. Ryan,et al.  A Survey of Disc Thickness and Viscosity in Circumbinary Accretion: Binary Evolution, Variability, and Disc Morphology , 2022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[4]  N. Zakamska,et al.  The eccentricity distribution of wide binaries and their individual measurements , 2021, 2111.01789.

[5]  H. Rix,et al.  A million binaries from Gaia eDR3: sample selection and validation of Gaia parallax uncertainties , 2021, 2101.05282.

[6]  P. J. Richards,et al.  Gaia Early Data Release 3: Summary of the contents and survey properties , 2020, 2012.01533.

[7]  N. Zakamska,et al.  The non-monotonic, strong metallicity dependence of the wide-binary fraction , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[8]  Daniel J. Price,et al.  The evolution of large cavities and disc eccentricity in circumbinary discs , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[9]  C. Nixon,et al.  On the orbital evolution of binaries with circumbinary discs , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[10]  N. Zakamska,et al.  Very wide companion fraction from Gaia DR2: A weak or no enhancement for hot Jupiter hosts, and a strong enhancement for contact binaries , 2020, 2007.03688.

[11]  J. Zrake,et al.  Gas-driven Inspiral of Binaries in Thin Accretion Disks , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[12]  R. Parker,et al.  Runaway and walkaway stars from the ONC with Gaia DR2 , 2020, 2004.13730.

[13]  A. Tokovinin Eccentricity distribution of wide low-mass binaries , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[14]  S. L'epine,et al.  The SUPERWIDE Catalog: A Catalog of 99,203 Wide Binaries Found in Gaia and Supplemented by the SUPERBLINK High Proper Motion Catalog , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[15]  J. Zrake,et al.  Circumbinary Disks: Accretion and Torque as a Function of Mass Ratio and Disk Viscosity , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[16]  A. Tokovinin,et al.  Formation of close binaries by disc fragmentation and migration, and its statistical modelling , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[17]  H. Rix,et al.  The Separation Distribution of Ultrawide Binaries across Galactic Populations , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[18]  F. Ménard,et al.  Observational constraints on dust disk sizes in tidally truncated protoplanetary disks in multiple systems in the Taurus region , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[19]  H. Rix,et al.  Discovery of an equal-mass ‘twin’ binary population reaching 1000 + au separations , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[20]  J. Stone,et al.  Hydrodynamic Torques in Circumbinary Accretion Disks , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[21]  Luca Ricci,et al.  The Disk Substructures at High Angular Resolution Project (DSHARP). I. Motivation, Sample, Calibration, and Overview , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[22]  D. Lai,et al.  Hydrodynamics of Circumbinary Accretion: Angular Momentum Transfer and Binary Orbital Evolution , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[23]  P. Hopkins,et al.  Where are the most ancient stars in the Milky Way? , 2018, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[24]  Jonathan P. Williams,et al.  ALMA Survey of Lupus Protoplanetary Disks. II. Gas Disk Radii , 2018, 1803.05923.

[25]  H. Rix,et al.  Discovery and characterization of 3000+ main-sequence binaries from APOGEE spectra , 2017, 1711.08793.

[26]  D. Hogg,et al.  Comoving Stars in Gaia DR1: An Abundance of Very Wide Separation Comoving Pairs , 2016, 1612.02440.

[27]  D. Lai,et al.  Viscous hydrodynamics simulations of circumbinary accretion discs: variability, quasi-steady state and angular momentum transfer , 2016, 1610.07263.

[28]  M. Moe,et al.  Mind Your Ps and Qs: The Interrelation between Period (P) and Mass-ratio (Q) Distributions of Binary Stars , 2016, 1606.05347.

[29]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  corner.py: Scatterplot matrices in Python , 2016, J. Open Source Softw..

[30]  Aaron Dotter,et al.  MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST) 0: METHODS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF STELLAR ISOCHRONES , 2016, 1601.05144.

[31]  Andrei Tokovinin,et al.  Eccentricity distribution of wide binaries , 2015, 1512.00278.

[32]  C. Clarke,et al.  Binary accretion rates: dependence on temperature and mass ratio , 2015, 1507.01850.

[33]  J. Baird,et al.  The evolution of the mass ratio of accreting binaries: the role of gas temperature , 2014, 1412.3963.

[34]  Paul M. Brunet,et al.  The Gaia mission , 2013, 1303.0303.

[35]  B. Reipurth,et al.  Formation of the widest binary stars from dynamical unfolding of triple systems , 2012, Nature.

[36]  Daniel Foreman-Mackey,et al.  emcee: The MCMC Hammer , 2012, 1202.3665.

[37]  M. Colpi,et al.  Limiting eccentricity of subparsec massive black hole binaries surrounded by self-gravitating gas discs , 2011, 1104.3868.

[38]  P. Armitage,et al.  Massive black hole binary mergers within subparsec scale gas discs , 2008, 0809.0311.

[39]  S. Söderhjelm The q = 1 peak in the mass-ratios for Hipparcos visual binaries , 2007 .

[40]  T. Hanawa,et al.  Evolution of a Protobinary: Accretion Rates of the Primary and Secondary , 2005 .

[41]  L. Sparke,et al.  Circumstellar and circumbinary discs in eccentric stellar binaries , 2005, astro-ph/0501244.

[42]  N. Shatsky The long-period companions of multiple stars tend to have moderate eccentricities , 2001 .

[43]  P. Kroupa On the variation of the initial mass function , 2000, astro-ph/0009005.

[44]  I. Bonnell,et al.  ACCRETION DURING BINARY STAR FORMATION. II : GASEOUS ACCRETION AND DISC FORMATION , 1997 .

[45]  S. Lubow,et al.  Dynamics of binary-disk interaction. 1: Resonances and disk gap sizes , 1994 .

[46]  C. Clarke,et al.  The effect of an external disk on the orbital elements of a central binary , 1991 .

[47]  L. Lucy,et al.  The significance of binaries with nearly identical components. , 1979 .