Adoption and Use of Computer-Based Voice Over Internet Protocol Phone Service: Toward an Integrated Model

This study examines factors influencing adoption and use of computer-based voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) phone service and attempts to integrate 2 theoretical approaches: the technology acceptance model (TAM) and the uses and gratifications framework. Using data from an online survey of VoIP users (N = 420), structural equation modeling analyses revealed that perceived ease of use had a significant impact on perceived usefulness. In addition, perceived usefulness had a positive effect on actual VoIP use. The study further discovered that motivations for communication and instrumental use significantly affected perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and actual VoIP use. This study suggests that integration of TAM and uses and gratifications can be fruitful in understanding user acceptance of new communication technologies.

[1]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[2]  E. Surface,et al.  FROM PAPER TO PIXELS: MOVING PERSONNEL SURVEYS TO THE WEB , 2003 .

[3]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[4]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: What are the Roles of Interface Characteristics, Organizational Context, and Individual Differences? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Media use in the information age : emerging patterns of adoption and consumer use , 1989 .

[6]  Lelia Green,et al.  Communication, technology and society , 2002 .

[7]  Diane Nahl,et al.  User-Centered Assessment of Two Web Browsers: Errors, Perceived Self-Efficacy, and Success. , 1997 .

[8]  P. Howard,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[9]  Wen-Hua Ren,et al.  Self-efficacy and the search for government information: a study of small-business executives , 1999 .

[10]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[11]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[12]  R. Rubin,et al.  Conceptualization and Measurement of Interpersonal Communication Motives , 1988 .

[13]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[14]  B. Muthén,et al.  Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models , 1977 .

[15]  H. Perkins,et al.  Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. , 1986, The International journal of the addictions.

[16]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[17]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[18]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[19]  C. Fischer “Touch Someone”: The Telephone Industry Discovers Sociability , 1988, Technology and Culture.

[20]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  Computer training, frequency of usage and burnout: the moderating role of computer self-efficacy , 2000 .

[21]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Using Davis's Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-use Instruments for Decision Making: A Confirmatory and Multigroup Invariance Analysis , 1998 .

[22]  J. H. Davis,et al.  Progress in applied social psychology , 1981 .

[23]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[24]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[25]  Gina M. Garramone,et al.  Uses of political computer bulletin boards , 1986 .

[26]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[27]  Edgar F. Borgatta,et al.  Sociological Methodology, 1969. , 1969 .

[28]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The Internet, 1995-2000 , 2001, ArXiv.

[29]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  The Telephone in Question: Questions on Communication , 1987, Comput. Networks.

[30]  Melvin J. Voigt,et al.  Progress in Communication Sciences , 1982 .

[31]  S. Rafaeli,et al.  Why Communication Researchers Should Study the Internet: A Dialogue , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[32]  Christine B. Smith,et al.  Casting the Net: Surveying an Internet Population , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[33]  Michael Lynn James,et al.  An exploratory study of the perceived benefits of electronic bulletin board use and their impact on other communication activities , 1992 .

[34]  G. O'keefe,et al.  More Than Just Talk: Uses, Gratifications, and the Telephone , 1995 .

[35]  Tracy Callaway Russo,et al.  The cocial construction of mobile telephony: an application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phones within personal communication networks , 2003 .

[36]  Dominic A. Infante,et al.  Building communication theory , 1990 .

[37]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[38]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Fred D. Davis User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[40]  Douglas A. Ferguson,et al.  The World Wide Web as a Functional Alternative to Television , 2000 .

[41]  Leah A. Lievrouw Progress in Communication Sciences, Volume XV: Advances in Telecommunications , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[42]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  A. Rubin The uses-and-gratifications perspective of media effects. , 2002 .

[44]  Louis Leung,et al.  College Student Motives for Chatting on ICQ , 2001, New Media Soc..

[45]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Attributes of movie distribution channels and consumer choice , 1991 .

[46]  C. Lin Online-Service Adoption Likelihood , 1999 .

[47]  J. Stanton AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF DATA COLLECTION USING THE INTERNET , 1998 .

[48]  I. Pool,et al.  The Social Impact of the Telephone , 1978 .

[49]  Elsie R. Shore,et al.  Substance Abuse on Campus: A Handbook for College and University Personnel , 1997 .

[50]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[51]  R. LaRose,et al.  Audiotext and the Re-Invention of the Telephone as a Mass Medium , 1992 .

[52]  Rob Kling,et al.  Learning About Information Technologies and Social Change: The Contribution of Social Informatics , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[53]  W. Dutton Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities , 1996 .

[54]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[55]  A. Rubin Media uses and effects: A uses-and-gratifications perspective. , 1994 .

[56]  Rudi Volti,et al.  America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940 , 1992 .

[57]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Internet use in the contemporary media environment. , 2001 .

[58]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[59]  H. Perkins,et al.  The emergence and evolution of the social norms approach to substance abuse prevention. , 2003 .

[60]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[62]  Sheizaf Rafaeli,et al.  The Electronic Bulletin Board: A Computer-Driven Mass Medium , 1984 .

[63]  Andrea L. Kavanaugh,et al.  The Impact of Community Computer Networks on Social Capital and Community Involvement , 2001 .

[64]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[65]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges , 2001, MIS Q..

[66]  J. Walther Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[67]  Cynthia M. Jackson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System , 1997 .

[68]  Louis Leung,et al.  Seeking news via the pager: An expectancy‐value study , 1999 .

[69]  Terry Daugherty,et al.  Organizational Virtual Communities: Exploring Motivations Behind Online Panel Participation , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[70]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Hyuhn-Suhck Bae,et al.  Entertainment-Education and Recruitment of Cornea Donors: The Role of Emotion and Issue Involvement , 2008, Journal of health communication.

[72]  Philip Palmgreen,et al.  Uses and Gratifications: A Theoretical Perspective , 1984 .

[73]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[74]  Kieran Mathieson,et al.  Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[75]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[76]  A. Rubin Audience activity and media use , 1993 .

[77]  C. Ogan,et al.  The Internet as Mass Medium , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[78]  John Dimmick,et al.  The Gratifications of the Household Telephone , 1994 .

[79]  H. Park,et al.  Distinctiveness and Influence of Subjective Norms, Personal Descriptive and Injunctive Norms, and Societal Descriptive and Injunctive Norms on Behavioral Intent: A Case of Two Behaviors Critical to Organ Donation , 2007 .

[80]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Perspectives on Media Effects , 1986 .

[81]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[82]  Mun Y. Yi,et al.  Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[83]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[84]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[85]  Namkee Park,et al.  University Instructors' Acceptance of Electronic Courseware: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[86]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[87]  Mark R. Levy,et al.  Children's Uses and Gratifications of Home VCRs , 1988 .

[88]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communicator Competence in the Workplace: Model Testing and Scale Development , 1981 .

[89]  Ran Wei,et al.  Staying connected while on the move , 2006, New Media Soc..

[90]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[91]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[92]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[93]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Adoption and Technology in Households: A Baseline Model Test and Extension Incorporating Household Life Cycle , 2005, MIS Q..

[94]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[95]  Kim Bartel Sheehan,et al.  E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[96]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital? , 2001 .

[97]  C. Davies,et al.  Organizational Influences on the University Electronic Library , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[98]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[99]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[100]  Thomas E. Ruggiero Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century , 2000 .

[101]  Benjamin D. Singer Social functions of the telephone , 1981 .

[102]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[103]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[104]  Diane Nahl Affective Monitoring of Internet Learners: Perceived Self-Efficacy and Success. , 1996 .

[105]  James J. Jiang,et al.  E‐commerce user behavior model: an empirical study , 2000 .

[106]  Louis Leung,et al.  More Than Just Talk on the Move: Uses and Gratifications of the Cellular Phone , 2000 .

[107]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[108]  Donald MacKenzie,et al.  The social shaping of technology : how the refrigerator got its hum , 1985 .

[109]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[110]  Alan M. Rubin,et al.  Utility of Videocassette Recorders , 1987 .

[111]  Charles R. Bantz,et al.  EXPLORING USES AND GRATIFICATIONS , 1982 .

[112]  Keith P. Sentis,et al.  Advertising and consumer psychology , 1986 .

[113]  Kenichi Ishii Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life , 2006 .

[114]  B. Byrne Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[115]  J. Bryant,et al.  Media effects : advances in theory and research , 2002 .

[116]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..