Molecular simulation methods in drug discovery: a prospective outlook
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Maryanoff,et al. 2009 Edward E Smissman Award. Pharmaceutical "gold" from neurostabilizing agents: topiramate and successor molecules. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[2] Traian Sulea,et al. Solvated Interaction Energy (SIE) for Scoring Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. 2. Benchmark in the CSAR-2010 Scoring Exercise , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[3] A. Laio,et al. Flexible docking in solution using metadynamics. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[4] Xevi Biarnés,et al. Molecular motions in drug design: the coming age of the metadynamics method , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[5] K. Merz,et al. Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[6] Jonathan W. Essex,et al. A review of protein-small molecule docking methods , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[7] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Drug-like Density: A Method of Quantifying the "Bindability" of a Protein Target Based on a Very Large Set of Pockets and Drug-like Ligands from the Protein Data Bank , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[8] Nohad Gresh,et al. Toward a Separate Reproduction of the Contributions to the Hartree-Fock and DFT Intermolecular Interaction Energies by Polarizable Molecular Mechanics with the SIBFA Potential. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[9] Christophe Chipot,et al. Free Energy Calculations , 2008 .
[10] Jianmin Gao,et al. Localized Thermodynamic Coupling between Hydrogen Bonding and Microenvironment Polarity Substantially Stabilizes Proteins , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.
[11] J. Andrew McCammon,et al. MM-PBSA Captures Key Role of Intercalating Water Molecules at a Protein−Protein Interface , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[12] John P. Overington,et al. How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[13] V. Hornak,et al. Modified replica exchange simulation methods for local structure refinement. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[14] Serdar Durdagi,et al. Binding of novel fullerene inhibitors to HIV-1 protease: insight through molecular dynamics and molecular mechanics Poisson–Boltzmann surface area calculations , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[15] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening in drug discovery. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[16] G. Klebe,et al. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.
[17] W. L. Jorgensen. The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.
[18] William L Jorgensen,et al. Efficient drug lead discovery and optimization. , 2009, Accounts of chemical research.
[19] F. Javier Luque,et al. Polarization effects in molecular interactions , 2011 .
[20] M. V. Subbotin,et al. A quantum mechanical polarizable force field for biomolecular interactions , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] Klaus Schulten,et al. Accelerating Molecular Modeling Applications with GPU Computing , 2009 .
[22] J. Mongan,et al. Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.
[23] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Optimized Radii for Poisson-Boltzmann Calculations with the AMBER Force Field. , 2005, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[24] C. E. Peishoff,et al. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[25] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Quantum mechanical binding free energy calculation for phosphopeptide inhibitors of the Lck SH2 domain , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..
[26] Samuel Genheden,et al. Comparison of the Efficiency of the LIE and MM/GBSA Methods to Calculate Ligand-Binding Energies. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[27] Pavel Hobza,et al. A reliable docking/scoring scheme based on the semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6-DH2 method accurately covering dispersion and H-bonding: HIV-1 protease with 22 ligands. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[28] S. Lampel,et al. The druggable genome: an update. , 2005, Drug discovery today.
[29] V I Tarasov,et al. Quantum mechanical polarizable force field (QMPFF3): refinement and validation of the dispersion interaction for aromatic carbon. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.
[30] Michal Otyepka,et al. Transferable scoring function based on semiempirical quantum mechanical PM6-DH2 method: CDK2 with 15 structurally diverse inhibitors , 2011, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[31] Anthony J Stone,et al. Accurate Induction Energies for Small Organic Molecules: 1. Theory. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[32] Peter A. Kollman,et al. FREE ENERGY CALCULATIONS : APPLICATIONS TO CHEMICAL AND BIOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA , 1993 .
[33] Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al. A GPU solvent–solvent interaction calculation accelerator for biomolecular simulations using the GROMOS software , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..
[34] Dino Moras,et al. Structural adaptability in the ligand-binding pocket of the ecdysone hormone receptor , 2003, Nature.
[35] F. J. Luque,et al. Protein flexibility and ligand recognition: challenges for molecular modeling. , 2011, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[36] Ivan S Ufimtsev,et al. Quantum Chemistry on Graphical Processing Units. 2. Direct Self-Consistent-Field Implementation. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[37] X. Barril,et al. Understanding and predicting druggability. A high-throughput method for detection of drug binding sites. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[38] Paul D Lyne,et al. Accurate prediction of the relative potencies of members of a series of kinase inhibitors using molecular docking and MM-GBSA scoring. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[39] Jacob Kongsted,et al. Ligand Affinities Estimated by Quantum Chemical Calculations. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[40] Bruce E Maryanoff. Inhibitors of serine proteases as potential therapeutic agents: the road from thrombin to tryptase to cathepsin G. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[41] Traian Sulea,et al. Rapid Prediction of Solvation Free Energy. 1. An Extensive Test of Linear Interaction Energy (LIE). , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[42] F. J. Luque,et al. Shielded hydrogen bonds as structural determinants of binding kinetics: application in drug design. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[43] Ivan S Ufimtsev,et al. Quantum Chemistry on Graphical Processing Units. 3. Analytical Energy Gradients, Geometry Optimization, and First Principles Molecular Dynamics. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[44] U. Ryde,et al. Ligand affinities predicted with the MM/PBSA method: dependence on the simulation method and the force field. , 2006, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.
[45] Ivan S. Ufimtsev,et al. Dynamic Precision for Electron Repulsion Integral Evaluation on Graphical Processing Units (GPUs). , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[46] Christophe Chipot,et al. Comprar Free Energy Calculations · Theory and Applications in Chemistry and Biology | Chipot, Christophe | 9783540736172 | Springer , 2007 .
[47] Kenneth M Merz,et al. A Mixed QM/MM Scoring Function to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[48] Valentina Tozzini,et al. Coarse-grained models for proteins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.
[49] Ivan S Ufimtsev,et al. Quantum Chemistry on Graphical Processing Units. 1. Strategies for Two-Electron Integral Evaluation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[50] Michal Otyepka,et al. Semiempirical quantum mechanical method PM6-DH2X describes the geometry and energetics of CK2-inhibitor complexes involving halogen bonds well, while the empirical potential fails. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[51] R. Nussinov,et al. Induced Fit, Conformational Selection and Independent Dynamic Segments: an Extended View of Binding Events Opinion , 2022 .
[52] P. Hajduk,et al. Druggability indices for protein targets derived from NMR-based screening data. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[53] Hongxing Lei,et al. Improved sampling methods for molecular simulation. , 2007, Current opinion in structural biology.
[54] F. J. Luque,et al. Pyrano[3,2-c]quinoline-6-chlorotacrine hybrids as a novel family of acetylcholinesterase- and beta-amyloid-directed anti-Alzheimer compounds. , 2009, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[55] Peter V Coveney,et al. Rapid and accurate prediction of binding free energies for saquinavir-bound HIV-1 proteases. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[56] Dariusz Plewczynski,et al. Can we trust docking results? Evaluation of seven commonly used programs on PDBbind database , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..
[57] Margaret E. Johnson,et al. Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[58] Ricardo Macarron,et al. Critical review of the role of HTS in drug discovery. , 2006, Drug discovery today.
[59] B. Berne,et al. Replica exchange with solute tempering: a method for sampling biological systems in explicit water. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[60] Daniel R. Caffrey,et al. Structure-based maximal affinity model predicts small-molecule druggability , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[61] Steven W. Muchmore,et al. Rapid Estimation of Relative Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities Using a High-Throughput Version of MM-PBSA , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[62] J. Gready,et al. Combining docking and molecular dynamic simulations in drug design , 2006, Medicinal research reviews.
[63] R. Cramer,et al. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[64] J Andrew McCammon,et al. Studying enzyme binding specificity in acetylcholinesterase using a combined molecular dynamics and multiple docking approach. , 2002, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[65] A. Cavalli,et al. Single-molecule pulling simulations can discern active from inactive enzyme inhibitors. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[66] Johannes C. Hermann,et al. A combined QM/MM approach to protein--ligand interactions: polarization effects of the HIV-1 protease on selected high affinity inhibitors. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[67] Jacob Kongsted,et al. An improved method to predict the entropy term with the MM/PBSA approach , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[68] Ryo Maezono,et al. Acceleration of a QM/MM‐QMC simulation using GPU , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..
[69] C. Hunter,et al. Quantifying intermolecular interactions: guidelines for the molecular recognition toolbox. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.
[70] A. Caflisch,et al. Is quantum mechanics necessary for predicting binding free energy? , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[71] Christine Humblet,et al. Investigation of MM-PBSA Rescoring of Docking Poses , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[72] Robert Kiss,et al. Virtual Fragment Docking by Glide: a Validation Study on 190 Protein-Fragment Complexes , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[73] Akash Khandelwal,et al. A combination of docking, QM/MM methods, and MD simulation for binding affinity estimation of metalloprotein ligands. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.