Asymmetric response time functions during left-/right-facing discriminations of rotated objects: The short and the long of it

[1]  J. Hamm,et al.  Individual differences in the mixture ratio of rotation and nonrotation trials during rotated mirror/normal letter discriminations , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Mental rotation is not easily cognitively penetrable , 2010 .

[3]  J. Hamm,et al.  A model of rotated mirror/normal letter discriminations , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[4]  M. Hausmann,et al.  Sex-specific response strategies in mental rotation , 2009 .

[5]  J. Hamm,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibilities during top-bottom discriminations. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[6]  M. Heil,et al.  Sex Differences in Mental Rotation with Polygons of Different Complexity: Do Men Utilize Holistic Processes whereas Women Prefer Piecemeal Ones? , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Petra Jansen-Osmann,et al.  Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  Daniel Voyer,et al.  Sex differences in mental rotation: Top–down versus bottom–up processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[10]  M. Bar.  A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  Manila Vannucci,et al.  Drawing and identifying objects in relation to semantic category and handedness , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  P. Mcmullen,et al.  Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[15]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Top-bottom and front-behind decisions on rotated objects. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[16]  P. Jolicoeur.  Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. , 1988, Canadian journal of psychology.

[17]  M. Corballis.  Recognition of disoriented shapes. , 1988, Psychological review.

[18]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[19]  P. Jolicoeur.  The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[20]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[21]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[22]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[23]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[25]  R. C. Oldfield.  THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .