Topology Optimization considering Nonsmooth Structural Boundaries in the Intersection Areas of the Components

In the structural topology optimization approaches, the Moving Morphable Component (MMC) is a new method to obtain the optimized structural topologies by optimizing shapes, sizes, and locations of components. However, the optimized structure boundary usually generates local nonsmooth areas due to incomplete connection between components. In the present paper, a topology optimization approach considering nonsmooth structural boundaries in the intersection areas of the components based on the MMC is proposed. The variability of components’ shape can be obtained by constructing the topology description function (TDF) with multiple thickness and length variables. The shape of components can be modified according to the structural responses during the optimization process, and the relatively smooth structural boundaries are generated in the intersection areas of the components. To reduce the impact of the initial layout on the rate of convergence, this method is implemented in a hierarchical variable calling strategy. Compared with the original MMC method, the advantage of the proposed approach is that the smoothness of the structural boundaries can be effectively improved and the geometric modeling ability can be enhanced in a concise way. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated for topology optimization of the minimum compliance problem and compliant mechanisms.

[1]  Jianhua Zhou,et al.  A Moving Morphable Void (MMV)-based explicit approach for topology optimization considering stress constraints , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[2]  O. Sigmund.  Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization , 2007 .

[3]  M. Zhou,et al.  Generalized shape optimization without homogenization , 1992 .

[4]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Explicit structural topology optimization based on moving morphable components (MMC) with curved skeletons , 2016 .

[5]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab , 2001 .

[6]  Anders Clausen,et al.  Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code , 2011 .

[7]  Xianda Xie,et al.  A new isogeometric topology optimization using moving morphable components based on R-functions and collocation schemes , 2018, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering.

[8]  Kurt Maute,et al.  Level-set methods for structural topology optimization: a review , 2013 .

[9]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization , 2009 .

[10]  Niels Olhoff,et al.  Topology optimization of continuum structures: A review* , 2001 .

[11]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Length scale and manufacturability in density-based topology optimization , 2016, Archive of Applied Mechanics.

[12]  G. Yoon,et al.  Implementation of topological derivative in the moving morphable components approach , 2017 .

[13]  Mei Yulin,et al.  A level set method for structural topology optimization and its applications , 2004 .

[14]  Gang-Won Jang,et al.  Topology optimization using moving morphable bars for versatile thickness control , 2017 .

[15]  Xuan Wang,et al.  Explicit Isogeometric Topology Optimization Using Moving Morphable Components (MMC) , 2017 .

[16]  Chang Liu,et al.  An efficient moving morphable component (MMC)-based approach for multi-resolution topology optimization , 2018, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[17]  O. Sigmund,et al.  Topology optimization approaches , 2013, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[18]  S. Osher,et al.  Level Set Methods for Optimization Problems Involving Geometry and Constraints I. Frequencies of a T , 2001 .

[19]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  Stress-based topology optimization with discrete geometric components , 2017 .

[20]  Wei Chen,et al.  Design for structural flexibility using connected morphable components based topology optimization , 2016 .

[21]  Xu Guo,et al.  Explicit topology optimization using IGA-based moving morphable void (MMV) approach , 2020 .

[22]  T. Shi,et al.  Constraints of distance from boundary to skeleton: For the control of length scale in level set based structural topology optimization , 2015 .

[23]  Julián A. Norato,et al.  A geometry projection method for the topology optimization of plate structures , 2016 .

[24]  Grégoire Allaire,et al.  Structural Optimization by the Level-Set Method , 2003 .

[25]  David Guirguis,et al.  A derivative-free level-set method for topology optimization , 2016 .

[26]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method , 1988 .

[27]  D. Tortorelli,et al.  A geometry projection method for continuum-based topology optimization with discrete elements , 2015 .

[28]  M. Bendsøe.  Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem , 1989 .

[29]  G. Allaire,et al.  A level-set method for shape optimization , 2002 .

[30]  Xianmin Zhang,et al.  Structural Topology Optimization Using a Moving Morphable Component-Based Method Considering Geometrical Nonlinearity , 2018, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[31]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization , 1999 .

[32]  G. Allaire,et al.  Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method , 2004 .

[33]  Xu Guo,et al.  Doing Topology Optimization Explicitly and Geometrically—A New Moving Morphable Components Based Framework , 2014 .

[34]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Evolutionary structural optimisation (ESO) using a bidirectional algorithm , 1998 .

[35]  Ramana V. Grandhi,et al.  A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000 , 2014 .

[36]  Jian Zhang,et al.  A new topology optimization approach based on Moving Morphable Components (MMC) and the ersatz material model , 2016 .

[37]  J OsherStanley,et al.  Level set methods for optimization problems involving geometry and constraints I. Frequencies of a two-density inhomogeneous drum , 2001 .