Constraining autonomy through norms

Despite many efforts to understand why and how norms can be incorporated into agents and multi-agent systems, there are still several gaps that must be filled. This paper focuses on one of the most important processes concerned with norms, namely that of norm compliance. However, instead of taking a static view of norms in which norms are straighforwardly complied with, we adopt a more dynamic view in which an agent's motivations, and therefore its autonomy, play an important role. We analyse the motivations that an agent might have to comply with norms, and then formally propose a set of strategies for use by agents in norm-based systems. Finally, through some simulation experiments, the effects of autonomous norm compliance in both individual agents and societies are analysed.

[1]  Alf Ross,et al.  Directives and norms , 1968 .

[2]  S. Kerr.  On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. , 1975 .

[3]  Editors , 1986, Brain Research Bulletin.

[4]  J. Michael Spivey,et al.  The Z notation - a reference manual , 1992, Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science.

[5]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Norms as Mental Objects - From Normative Beliefs to Normative Goals , 1993, MAAMAW.

[6]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Understanding the Emergence of Conventions in Multi-Agent Systems , 1995, ICMAS.

[7]  Michael Luck,et al.  A Formal Framework for Agency and Autonomy , 1995, ICMAS.

[8]  R. Conte,et al.  Cognitive and social action , 1995 .

[9]  Frank Dignum,et al.  A Modal Approach to Intentions, Commitments and Obligations: Intention plus Commitment Yields Obligation , 1996, DEON.

[10]  Michael Luck,et al.  Motivated Behaviour for Goal Adoption , 1998 .

[11]  Les Gasser,et al.  Organizational Approaches to Coordination in Multi-Agent Systems , 1998, Informationstechnik Tech. Inform..

[12]  Michael W. Macy.  Social Order in Artificial Worlds , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[13]  Mario Paolucci,et al.  Normative reputation and the costs of compliance , 1998, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[14]  Michael Luck,et al.  Motivated Behavior for Goal Adoption , 1998, DAI.

[15]  M. Wooldridge,et al.  Organisational Abstractions for the Analysis and Design of Multi-Agent Systems , 2000 .

[16]  Frank Dignum,et al.  Towards socially sophisticated BDI agents , 2000, Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems.

[17]  Michael Luck,et al.  Plan Analysis for Autonomous Sociological Agents , 2000, ATAL.

[18]  R. Conte,et al.  ARE INCENTIVES GOOD ENOUGH TO ACHIEVE (INFO) SOCIAL ORDER , 2001 .

[19]  Michael Luck,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Agent Definition and Development , 2001, Comput. J..

[20]  Rosaria Conte,et al.  Emergent (info)institutions , 2001, Cognitive Systems Research.

[21]  G. Boella,et al.  Deliberate Normative Agents , 2001 .

[22]  Michael Luck,et al.  Understanding Agent Systems , 2001, Springer Series on Agent Technology.

[23]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Introduction: Agents and Norms: How to fill the gap? , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[24]  Timo Steffens,et al.  Understanding Agent Systems , 2004, Künstliche Intell..