Digital PCR for direct quantification of viruses without DNA extraction

DNA extraction before amplification is considered an essential step for quantification of viral DNA using real-time PCR (qPCR). However, this can directly affect the final measurements due to variable DNA yields and removal of inhibitors, which leads to increased inter-laboratory variability of qPCR measurements and reduced agreement on viral loads. Digital PCR (dPCR) might be an advantageous methodology for the measurement of virus concentrations, as it does not depend on any calibration material and it has higher tolerance to inhibitors. DNA quantification without an extraction step (i.e. direct quantification) was performed here using dPCR and two different human cytomegalovirus whole-virus materials. Two dPCR platforms were used for this direct quantification of the viral DNA, and these were compared with quantification of the extracted viral DNA in terms of yield and variability. Direct quantification of both whole-virus materials present in simple matrices like cell lysate or Tris-HCl buffer provided repeatable measurements of virus concentrations that were probably in closer agreement with the actual viral load than when estimated through quantification of the extracted DNA. Direct dPCR quantification of other viruses, reference materials and clinically relevant matrices is now needed to show the full versatility of this very promising and cost-efficient development in virus quantification.

[1]  A. Caliendo,et al.  Factors Contributing to Variability of Quantitative Viral PCR Results in Proficiency Testing Samples: a Multivariate Analysis , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  T. Dingle,et al.  Tolerance of droplet-digital PCR vs real-time quantitative PCR to inhibitory substances. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  T. Illmer,et al.  Detection of beta-herpesviruses in allogenic stem cell recipients by quantitative real-time PCR. , 2006, Journal of virological methods.

[4]  K. Jerome,et al.  Viral diagnostics in the era of digital polymerase chain reaction. , 2013, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease.

[5]  Jim F Huggett,et al.  Comparative study of sensitivity, linearity, and resistance to inhibition of digital and nondigital polymerase chain reaction and loop mediated isothermal amplification assays for quantification of human cytomegalovirus. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  T. Illmer,et al.  Detection of β-herpesviruses in allogenic stem cell recipients by quantitative real-time PCR , 2006 .

[7]  Alexandra S. Whale,et al.  Methods for Applying Accurate Digital PCR Analysis on Low Copy DNA Samples , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  A. Heath,et al.  Collaborative Study to Evaluate the Proposed 1st WHO International Standard for Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) for Nucleic Acid Amplification (NAT)-Based Assays , 2010 .

[9]  V. Beneš,et al.  The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[10]  R. Zepp,et al.  Influence of inorganic ions on aggregation and adsorption behaviors of human adenovirus. , 2012, Environmental Science and Technology.

[11]  M. Holden,et al.  International standards and reference materials for quantitative molecular infectious disease testing. , 2010, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[12]  Angela M Caliendo,et al.  A commutable cytomegalovirus calibrator is required to improve the agreement of viral load values between laboratories. , 2009, Clinical chemistry.

[13]  Jim F Huggett,et al.  Highly reproducible absolute quantification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by digital PCR. , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[14]  Hendrik Emons,et al.  DNA copy number concentration measured by digital and droplet digital quantitative PCR using certified reference materials , 2015, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.

[15]  T. F. Smith,et al.  Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing , 2006, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[16]  R. Kaiser,et al.  Extraction of viral nucleic acids: comparison of five automated nucleic acid extraction platforms. , 2012, Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology.

[17]  Li-hua Hu,et al.  Rapid quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA by direct real-time PCR from serum without DNA extraction. , 2007, Journal of medical microbiology.

[18]  Jim F Huggett,et al.  Considerations for digital PCR as an accurate molecular diagnostic tool. , 2015, Clinical chemistry.