AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF DETERRENCE: CHEATING, SELF‐SERVING BIAS, AND IMPULSIVITY*

This paper reports results from a randomized experiment in which 256 participants recruited to complete a survey could earn extra payment by cheating on a quiz. We report the first deterrence experiment that incorporates significant elements of situational and individual difference theories of crime into a single analytic framework. Consistent with extant deterrence research, the prevalence of cheating was lower when detection was more certain but not when the penalty was more severe. Further, cheating was more likely among participants with stronger present-orientation, or who were prone to self-serving bias.

[1]  John F. Wallace,et al.  Neuroticism and the Attentional Mediation of Dysregulatory Psychopathology , 1997, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[2]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Can Punishment Encourage Offending? Investigating The “resetting” Effect , 2003 .

[3]  Greg Pogarsky,et al.  Identifying “deterrable” offenders: Implications for research on deterrence , 2002 .

[4]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Beyond Stafford and Warr's Reconceptualization of Deterrence: Personal and Vicarious Experiences, Impulsivity, and Offending Behavior , 2002 .

[5]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  INTEGRATING CELERITY, IMPULSIVITY, AND EXTRALEGAL SANCTION THREATS INTO A MODEL OF GENERAL DETERRENCE: THEORY AND EVIDENCE* , 2001 .

[6]  Matthew C. Scheider.  Deterrence and the base rate fallacy: An examination of perceived certainty , 2001 .

[7]  Linda Babcock,et al.  Damage Caps, Motivated Anchoring, and Bargaining Impasse , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[8]  C. W. Dean,et al.  Onset Age, Persistence, and Offending Versatility: Comparisons Across Gender , 2000 .

[9]  R. Pihl,et al.  Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, general memory, and IQ. , 1999, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[10]  C. W. Dean,et al.  Onset Age and Offense Specialization , 1999 .

[11]  Robert A. Silverman,et al.  LOW SELF-CONTROL AND OPPORTUNITY: TESTING THE GENERAL THEORY OF CRIME AS AN EXPLANATION FOR GENDER DIFFERENCES IN DELINQUENCY* , 1999 .

[12]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  The Effect of Sexual Arousal on Expectations of Sexual Forcefulness , 1997 .

[13]  Velmer S. Burton,et al.  THE SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF SELF-CONTROL: TESTING THE GENERAL THEORY OF CRIME* , 1997 .

[14]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Behavioral Law and Economics: Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-serving Biases , 1997 .

[15]  Thomas B. Marvell,et al.  SPECIFICATION PROBLEMS, POLICE LEVELS, AND CRIME RATES* , 1996 .

[16]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders' decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending , 1996 .

[17]  Bert N. Uchino,et al.  The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  R. Paternoster,et al.  Sanction threats and appeals to morality : Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime , 1996 .

[19]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  The Effect of Prison Population Size on Crime Rates: Evidence from Prison Overcrowding Litigation , 1995 .

[20]  John Braithwaite,et al.  The Dialectics of Corporate Deterrence , 1994 .

[21]  D. Ward,et al.  Deterrence, Opportunity, and Choice , 1994 .

[22]  Enforcement risk and deterrence: A re-examination , 1994 .

[23]  Jiang Yu,et al.  THE CERTAINTY OF PUNISHMENT: A REFERENCE GROUP EFFECT AND ITS FUNCTIONAL FORM , 1993 .

[24]  Michael W. Neustrom,et al.  THE IMPACT OF DRUNK DRIVING LEGISLATION IN LOUISIANA , 1993 .

[25]  T. Moffitt,et al.  Explaining the relation between IQ and delinquency: class, race, test motivation, school failure, or self-control? , 1993, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[26]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Testing the Core Empirical Implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's General Theory of Crime , 1993 .

[27]  D. Nagin,et al.  Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime , 1993 .

[28]  Brenda Sims Blackwell,et al.  Changes in the sex patterning of perceived threats of sanctions , 1993 .

[29]  R. Bachman,et al.  The Rationality of Sexual Offending: Testing a Deterrence/Rational Choice Conception of Sexual Assault , 1992 .

[30]  Harold G. Grasmick,et al.  Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. , 1990 .

[31]  Daniel S. Nagin,et al.  THE DETERRENT EFFECT OF PERCEIVED CERTAINTY AND SEVERITY OF PUNISHMENT REVISITED , 1989 .

[32]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  R. Paternoster,et al.  The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment: A review of the evidence and issues , 1987 .

[34]  K. Williams,et al.  Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. , 1986 .

[35]  D. Ward,et al.  Sanctions, modeling, and deviant behavior , 1986 .

[36]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  ASSESSMENTS OF RISK AND BEHAVIORAL EXPERIENCE: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF CHANGE , 1985 .

[37]  J. Bachorowski,et al.  Impulsivity in adults: Motor inhibition and time-interval estimation. , 1985 .

[38]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Perceived risk and social control: Do sanctions really deter? , 1983 .

[39]  Ted Chiricos,et al.  Deterrent and Experiential Effects: the Problem of Causal Order in Perceptual Deterrence Research , 1982 .

[40]  B. Latané,et al.  The Social Impact of Majorities and Minorities. , 1981 .

[41]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Gender and Perceived Chances of Arrest , 1981 .

[42]  O. Svenson.  ARE WE ALL LESS RISKY AND MORE SKILLFUL THAN OUR FELLOW DRIVERS , 1981 .

[43]  R. Thaler.  Toward a positive theory of consumer choice , 1980 .

[44]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[45]  M. Ross,et al.  Egocentric Biases in Availability and Attribution , 1979 .

[46]  Barbara Boland,et al.  The effect of the police on crime , 1979 .

[47]  Robert F. Meier,et al.  Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of Conformity , 1977 .

[48]  Laurie Larwood,et al.  Managerial myopia: Self-serving biases in organizational planning. , 1977 .

[49]  K. Cross.  Not can, but will college teaching be improved? , 1977 .

[50]  G. Heisler.  Ways to deter law violators: Effects of levels of threat and vicarious punishment on cheating. , 1974 .

[51]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Certainty of Arrest and Crime Rates: A Further Test of the Deterrence Hypothesis , 1974 .

[52]  Isaac Ehrlich,et al.  The Deterrent Effect of Capital Punishment: A Question of Life and Death , 1973 .

[53]  I. Ehrlich.  Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[54]  Charles R. Tittle,et al.  Moral Appeal, Sanction Threat, and Deviance: An Experimental Test , 1973 .

[55]  Lowell Schoer,et al.  The Effects of Probability of Test Success, Test Importance, and Risk of Detection on the Incidence of Cheating. , 1972 .

[56]  M. Hindelang.  Age, Sex, and the Versatility of Delinquent Involvements , 1971 .

[57]  John P. Hill,et al.  Knowledge of peer success and risk of detection as determinants of cheating. , 1969 .

[58]  D. Ellsberg.  Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[59]  E. Barratt,et al.  Anxiety and Impulsiveness Related to Psychomotor Efficiency , 1959 .

[60]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[61]  M. Allais.  Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .