Impact of course policy changes on calculus II DFW rates

This paper examines the impact of departmental policy changes on the trend in DFW proportions for Calculus II at a large research university. Calculus I and II have been shown to be barrier courses for STEM majors, so increasing student success in these courses is imperative to retaining more students in STEM fields. A study was conducted to investigate how the DFW proportions for Calculus II changed in response to the policy changes. The data spanned Spring 2002–Fall 2016, and major changes in policy took place twice during this time. The policy changes were a combination of instructional method, textbook and online homework software, grading policies and passing conditions for the course. Three periods corresponding to the policy changes were defined: Pre-SCALE-UP (2002–2006), Active Learning (SCALE-UP) (2007–2013), and Post-SCALE-UP (2014–2016). The findings suggested that the second round of policy changes made in Calculus II had a larger impact on the mean DFW proportion than the first round of policy changes. The policy changes impacted individual D, F, and W proportions for the fall semester, while only the W proportion for the spring semester seemed to be affected, specifically by the Post-SCALE-UP changes.

[1]  Chris Rasmussen,et al.  The calculus student: insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study , 2013 .

[2]  William C. Bridges,et al.  Calculus I Course Policy Changes and Impact on Various Demographic Student Group Success , 2017 .

[3]  Philip T. Dunwoody,et al.  Why Students Withdraw from Classes , 1995 .

[4]  Marisa K. Orr,et al.  Special session - enhancing student learning using SCALE-UP format , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[5]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[6]  J. Moore Undergraduate mathematics achievement in the emerging ethnic engineers programme , 2005 .

[7]  Joseph I. Lipson,et al.  Twenty questions about student errors , 1986 .

[8]  Greg Michalski Complementing the Numbers: A Text Mining Analysis of College Course Withdrawals. , 2011 .

[9]  Steve Olson,et al.  Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. , 2012 .

[10]  Laura J. Pyzdrowski,et al.  READINESS AND ATTITUDES AS INDICATORS FOR SUCCESS IN COLLEGE CALCULUS , 2013 .

[11]  D. Bressoud,et al.  Seven Characteristics of Successful Calculus Programs , 2015 .

[12]  R. Beichner The Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) Project , 2007 .

[13]  Radhika Suresh,et al.  The Relationship between Barrier Courses and Persistence in Engineering , 2006 .

[14]  Scott D. Schiff,et al.  Student-centered active, cooperative learning in engineering , 2010 .

[15]  M. Hall,et al.  Why Do Students Withdraw From Courses , 2003 .

[16]  Stephen H. Friedberg,et al.  Factors Affecting Achievement in the First Course in Calculus. , 1984 .