Improving The Performance of Motor Imagery Based Brain-Computer Interface Using Phase Space Reconstruction

In recent decades, motor imagery (MI) based brain-computer interface (BCI) is served as a control system or rehabilitation tool for motor disabled people. But it has limited applications because of its lower classification performance (classification accuracy, Cohen’s kappa coefficient and etc.). The performance depends on the feature extraction techniques and extraction of relevant features from the brain is challenging task. The existing techniques have low classification performance and are computationally inefficient. This paper introduces phase space reconstruction (PSR) to detect various MI activities and improve the performance of the system. First, raw signals were decomposed into multiple frequency sub-bands using filter bank technique. Second, PSR was applied to each sub-band and dynamical behavior of the brain activities has been analyzed. The optimal parameters (time delay and embedding dimension) of PSR were calculated by average mutual information (AMI) and false nearest neighbors (FNN) methods. The time delay and embedding dimension extracted significant features related to MI activities. The significant features were fed into multi-class support vector machine (SVM) and performance of the classifier was evaluated. The performance of the system is based on classification accuracy (%CA) and Cohen’s kappa coefficient (K). The proposed algorithm and classifier were tested on BCI competition-2005, MI dataset-III-a. The results show that the proposed technique increases the classification accuracy by 3.7% and achieved higher performance (%CA = 89.20% and K= 0.85).

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[2]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  The BCI competition III: validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[4]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[5]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Characterization of four-class motor imagery EEG data for the BCI-competition 2005 , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  George Sugihara,et al.  Distinguishing time-delayed causal interactions using convergent cross mapping , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Songmin Jia,et al.  Multi-class imagery EEG recognition based on adaptive subject-based feature extraction and SVM-BP classifier , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[8]  Ruimin Wang,et al.  Classification of Four-Class Motor Imagery Employing Single-Channel Electroencephalography , 2014, PloS one.

[9]  Jing Hai Yin,et al.  Features Extraction Method of Motor Imagery EEG Based on Information Granules , 2014 .

[10]  Yang Li,et al.  A Sparse Common Spatial Pattern Algorithm for Brain-Computer Interface , 2011, ICONIP.

[11]  Min-You Chen,et al.  Phase space reconstruction for improving the classification of single trial EEG , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[12]  Clemens Brunner,et al.  Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  Fraser,et al.  Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[14]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Amama Mahmood,et al.  Classification of multi-class motor imagery EEG using four band common spatial pattern , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[16]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.