The appraisal of surface orbital vibrators with buried geophone array for permanent reservoir monitoring

Time‐lapse seismic is one of the main methods for monitoring changes in reservoir conditions caused by production or injection of fluids. One approach to time‐lapse seismic is through permanent reservoir monitoring, whereby seismic sources and/or receivers are permanently deployed. Permanent reservoir monitoring can offer a more cost‐effective and environmentally friendly solution than traditional campaign‐based surveys that rely on temporarily deployed equipment while facilitating more frequent measurements. At the CO2CRC Otway Project, surface orbital vibrators were coupled to a buried geophone array to form a permanent reservoir monitoring system. These are fixed position seismic sources that provide both P and S waves using induction motor‐driven eccentric masses. After an initial injection of CO2 in February 2016, five months of continuous seismic data were acquired, and reflection imaging was used to assess the system performance. Analysis of the data showed the effects of weather variations on the near‐surface conditions and the sweep signatures of surface orbital vibrators. Data processing flows of the continuous data was adapted from Vibroseis four‐dimensional data processing flows. Ground roll proved a significant challenge to data processing. In addition, variations in the surface wave pattern were linked to major rainfall events. For the appraisal of surface orbital vibrators in imaging, a Vibroseis four‐dimensional monitor survey data with similar geometry was also processed. Surface orbital vibrators are observed to be reliable sources with a potential to provide a repeatable signal, especially if the ground roll should fall outside the target window of interest. To guide future permanent reservoir monitoring applications, a repeatability analysis was performed for the various key data processing steps.

[1]  H. Chauris,et al.  Time-lapse velocity analysis – application to onshore continuous reservoir monitoring , 2018 .

[2]  Barry Freifeld,et al.  Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic Monitoring of The Near Surface: A Traffic-Noise Interferometry Case Study , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[3]  D. White,et al.  Repeatability of a rotary seismic source at the Aquistore CCS site , 2017 .

[4]  Boris Gurevich,et al.  Surface orbital vibrator for permanent seismic monitoring: A signal contents and repeatability appraisal , 2017 .

[5]  T. Daley,et al.  4D surface seismic tracks small supercritical CO2 injection into the subsurface: CO2CRC Otway Project , 2017 .

[6]  J. Ajo-Franklin,et al.  The CO2CRC Otway Project deployment of a Distributed Acoustic Sensing Network Coupled with Permanent Rotary Sources , 2016 .

[7]  Eric Forgues,et al.  Permanent, Continuous & Unmanned 4D Seismic Monitoring: Peace River Case Study , 2015 .

[8]  Rajindar Singh,et al.  Design and deployment of a buried geophone array for CO2 geosequestration monitoring: CO2CRC Otway Project, Stage 2C , 2015 .

[9]  D. White,et al.  Assessment of 4D seismic repeatability and CO2 detection limits using a sparse permanent land array at the Aquistore CO2 storage site , 2015 .

[10]  A. Bakulin,et al.  Near Surface Changes and 4D Seismic Repeatability in Desert Environment: From Days to Years , 2014 .

[11]  Andrey Bakulin,et al.  Suitability of vibrators for time-lapse monitoring in the Middle East , 2012 .

[12]  Milovan Urosevic,et al.  Repeatability analysis of land time‐lapse seismic data: CO2CRC Otway pilot project case study , 2011 .

[13]  P. Cary,et al.  Ground Roll Attenuation With Singular Value Decomposition , 2009 .

[14]  É. Forgues,et al.  Seismic Repeatability – Is There a Limit? , 2009 .

[15]  Olav I. Barkved,et al.  Continuous seismic surveillance of Valhall Field , 2008 .

[16]  T. Daley,et al.  Orbital vibrator seismic source for simultaneous P- and S-wave crosswell acquisition , 2001 .

[17]  Julien Meunier,et al.  Reservoir monitoring using permanent sources and vertical receiver antennae The Céré-la-Ronde case study , 2001 .

[18]  T. Daley,et al.  Active surface and borehole seismic monitoring of a small supercritical CO2 injection into the subsurface: experience from the CO2CRC Otway Project , 2020 .

[19]  D. Popik Advanced Analysis of Time-lapse Seismic Data for CO2 Geosequestration Monitoring , 2019 .

[20]  B. Freifeld,et al.  Repeatability Analysis for Continuous Seismic Monitoring with the Surface Geophone Array and the Permanent Rotary Sources: Co2crc Stage 2c , 2018 .

[21]  Boris Gurevich,et al.  Surface orbital vibrator (SOV) and fiber-optic DAS: Field demonstration of economical, continuous-land seismic time-lapse monitoring from the Australian CO2CRC Otway site , 2016 .

[22]  A. Bakulin,et al.  Processing and repeatability of 4D buried receiver data in a desert environment , 2016 .

[23]  David H. Johnston,et al.  Practical Applications of Time-lapse Seismic Data , 2013 .

[24]  J. C. Hornman,et al.  Continuous Monitoring of Thermal EOR at Schoonebeek for Intelligent Reservoir Management , 2012 .

[25]  David Lumley,et al.  Time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring , 2001 .