Experimental Studies of Group Selection: What Do They Tell US About Group Selection in Nature?

The study of group selection has developed along two autonomous lines. One approach, which we refer to as the adaptationist school, seeks to understand the evolution of existing traits by examining plausible mechanisms for their evolution and persistence. The other approach, which we refer to as the genetic school, seeks to examine how currently acting artificial or natural selection changes traits within populations and focuses on current evolutionary change. The levels of selection debate lies mainly within the adaptationist school, whereas the experimental studies of group selection lie within the genetic school. Because of the very different traditions and goals of these two schools, the experimental studies of group selection have not had a major impact on the group selection debate. We review the experimental results of the genetic school in the context of the group selection controversy and address the following questions: Under what conditions is group selection effective? What is the genetic basis of a response to group selection? How common is group selection in nature?

[1]  Thomas Park,et al.  Experimental Studies of Interspecies Competition II. Temperature, Humidity, and Competition in Two Species of Tribolium , 1954, Physiological Zoology.

[2]  Robert K. Colwell,et al.  EVOLUTION OF SEX RATIO IN STRUCTURED DEMES , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  C. Goodnight.  THE INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION ON GROUP AND INDIVIDUAL SELECTION IN A CRESS , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[4]  B. Griffing.  A theory of natural selection incorporating interaction among individuals. VIII. Use of groups consisting of a sire and several dams. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  S. Kalisz,et al.  Multilevel Selection in Natural Populations of Impatiens capensis , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[6]  M. Wade.  GROUP SELECTION: MIGRATION AND THE DIFFERENTIATION OF SMALL POPULATIONS , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[7]  Genetic stability of cannibalism inTribolium confusum , 1985, Behavior genetics.

[8]  M. Wade,et al.  Selection Within and between Kin Groups of the Imported Willow Leaf Beetle , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[9]  D. Wilson.  THE GROUP SELECTION CONTROVERSY: History and Current Status , 1983 .

[10]  M. Wade.  CHANGES IN GROUP‐SELECTED TRAITS THAT OCCUR WHEN GROUP SELECTION IS RELAXED , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  S. Harrison,et al.  Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structure. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Lawrence H. Boyd,et al.  Contextual Analysis: Concepts and Statistical Techniques , 1979 .

[13]  M. Kimura,et al.  An introduction to population genetics theory , 1971 .

[14]  D. Hartl,et al.  Principles of population genetics , 1981 .

[15]  W. Kilmer,et al.  INTERDEMIC SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF ALTRUISM: A COMPUTER SIMULATION STUDY , 1974, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  J. Herbers,et al.  COMPLEX COLONY STRUCTURE IN SOCIAL INSECTS: II. REPRODUCTION, QUEEN‐WORKER CONFLICT, AND LEVELS OF SELECTION , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Thomas Park,et al.  Cannibalistic Predation in Populations of Flour Beetles , 1965, Physiological Zoology.

[18]  M. Wade.  Group selections among laboratory populations of Tribolium. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Karl P. Schmidt,et al.  Principles of Animal Ecology , 1950 .

[20]  B. Griffing.  A theory of natural selection incorporating interaction among individuals. II. Use of related groups. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  D. Falconer,et al.  Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. , 1961 .

[22]  W. Muir,et al.  Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. , 1996, Poultry science.

[23]  W. Muir,et al.  Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: beak-related mortality, feathering, and body weight responses. , 1996, Poultry science.

[24]  M. Wade,et al.  GROUP SELECTION: THE GENETIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC BASIS FOR THE PHENOTYPIC DIFFERENTIATION OF SMALL POPULATIONS OF TRIBOLIUM CASTANEUM , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  E. Sober,et al.  Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences , 1994 .

[26]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[27]  A theory of natural selection incorporating interaction among individuals. IX. Use of groups consisting of a mating pair and sterile diploid caste members. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  George C. Williams,et al.  Adaptation and Natural Selection , 2018 .

[29]  S. Wright.  Tempo and Mode in Evolution: A Critical Review , 1945 .

[30]  David M. Craig,et al.  GROUP SELECTION VERSUS INDIVIDUAL SELECTION: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[31]  C. Goodnight.  ON THE EFFECT OF FOUNDER EVENTS ON EPISTATIC GENETIC VARIANCE , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[32]  V. Wynne-Edwards.  Group Selection and Kin Selection , 1964, Nature.

[33]  M. Wade,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF GROUP SELECTION , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  I. L. Heisler,et al.  A Method for Analyzing Selection in Hierarchically Structured Populations , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[35]  C. Goodnight.  Intermixing Ability in Two-Species Communities of Tribolium Flour Beetles , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[36]  M J Wade,et al.  Wright's shifting balance theory: an experimental study , 1991, Science.

[37]  J. Kelly.  Kin Selection in the Annual Plant Impatiens capensis , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[38]  E. Sober,et al.  Reviving the superorganism. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  James R. Griesemer,et al.  Laboratory models, causal explanation and group selection , 1988 .

[40]  C. Goodnight,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF COMMUNITY EVOLUTION II: THE ECOLOGICAL BASIS OF THE RESPONSE TO COMMUNITY SELECTION , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  Reply from s. Harrison and a. Hastings. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[42]  K. Tsuji.  Reproductive Conflicts and Levels of Selection in the Ant Pristomyrmex pungens: Contextual Analysis and Partitioning of Covariance , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[43]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[44]  Michael J. Wade,et al.  A Critical Review of the Models of Group Selection , 1978, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[45]  M. McClintock.  Group Mating in the Domestic Rat as a Context for Sexual Selection: Consequences for the Analysis of Sexual Behavior and Neuroendocrine Responses , 1984 .

[46]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON CORRELATED CHARACTERS , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[47]  M. Wade.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF KIN SELECTION , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  Sewall Wright,et al.  Experimental results and evolutionary deductions , 1977 .

[49]  S. J. Arnold,et al.  ON THE MEASUREMENT OF NATURAL AND SEXUAL SELECTION: THEORY , 1984, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[50]  B. Griffing.  A theory of natural selection incorporating interaction among individuals. X. Use of groups consisting of a mating pair together with haploid and diploid caste members. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[51]  B. Griffing.  A theory of natural selection incorporating interaction among individuals. III. Use of random groups of inbred individuals. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[52]  Charles J. Goodnight,et al.  Contextual Analysis of Models of Group Selection, Soft Selection, Hard Selection, and the Evolution of Altruism , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[53]  J. M. Smith,et al.  Group Selection , 1976, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[54]  J. Harper.  Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[55]  K. Petrusewicz,et al.  Genetic Strains of Tribolium: Their Primary Characteristics , 1961, Physiological Zoology.

[56]  B. Griffing.  A theory of natural selection incorporating interaction among individuals. VI. Use of non-random synchronized groups. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[57]  P. Pye-Smith.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[58]  B. Griffing.  A theory of natural selection incorporating interaction among individuals. I. The modeling process. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[59]  Charles J Goodnight,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF COMMUNITY EVOLUTION I: THE RESPONSE TO SELECTION AT THE COMMUNITY LEVEL , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  S. Boorman,et al.  Group selection on the boundary of a stable population. , 1972, Theoretical population biology.

[61]  D. Ehrhardt,et al.  Dominance and suppression, size-dependent growth and self-thinning in a natural Impatiens capensis population , 1987 .

[62]  B. Griffing.  Genetic analysis of plant mixtures. , 1989, Genetics.

[63]  Thomas Park,et al.  Interspecies Competition in Populations of Trilobium confusum Duval and Trilobium castaneum Herbst , 1948 .