Explaining the acceptance and use of government Internet services: A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands

In this article, an attempt is made to explain the descriptive data of a large-scale representative survey of the use of government Internet services by the Dutch population in 2006 by means of a multidisciplinary model of technology acceptance and use that is applied to these services. Ultimately, the model is tested with structural equation modeling techniques. It appears to fit to the data after some modifications and exclusion of variables. The ultimate model could be used to explain the acceptance and use of government Internet services. The larger correlation model could serve as a framework for research of Internet services in general. The social–demographic and psychological factors usually investigated in new technology acceptance and usage research do not prove to be strong here. Instead, it is demonstrated that the availability of Internet services, the knowledge of this availability, the preference to use digital channels, and the ability and experience to do this are the primary conditions. The most general conclusion drawn is that the acceptance and use of government Internet services is a matter of learning, and that acceptance and use should be analyzed as a dynamic process. People will stick to their habits of using traditional channels unless they happen to learn a better alternative. Governments are recommended to add a demand-side orientation and benchmarking for the supply of government Internet services and to develop service tracking technologies monitoring usage and users.

[1]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[2]  E. Katz,et al.  The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research Volume III. , 1975 .

[3]  R. LaRose,et al.  A Social Cognitive Theory of Internet Uses and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of Media Attendance , 2004 .

[4]  R. Silverstone From Audiences to Consumers: The Household and the Consumption of Communication and Information Technologies , 1991, The Audience and Its Landscape.

[5]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Why E-government Usage Lags Behind: Explaining the Gap Between Potential and Actual Usage of Electronic Public Services in the Netherlands , 2006, EGOV.

[6]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[7]  Diane Hamilton,et al.  Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Per E. Pedersen,et al.  Adoption of Mobile Internet Services: An Exploratory Study of Mobile Commerce Early Adopters , 2005, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[10]  James Pilditch Communication by design , 1970 .

[11]  R. LaRose,et al.  Understanding Internet Usage , 2001 .

[12]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[13]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[14]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .