Antenna Selection for MIMO Systems with Closely Spaced Antennas

Physical size limitations in user equipment may force multiple antennas to be spaced closely, and this generates a considerable amount of mutual coupling between antenna elements whose effect cannot be neglected. Thus, the design and deployment of antenna selection schemes appropriate for next generation wireless standards such as 3GPP long term evolution (LTE) and LTE advanced needs to take these practical implementation issues into account. In this paper, we consider multiple-input multipleoutput (MIMO) systems where antenna elements are placed side by side in a limited-size linear array, and we examine the performance of some typical antenna selection approaches in such systems and under various scenarios of antenna spacing and mutual coupling. These antenna selection schemes range from the conventional hard selection method where only part of the antennas are active, to some newly proposed methods where all the antennas are used, which are categorized as soft selection. For the cases we consider, our results indicate that, given the presence of mutual coupling, soft selection can always achieve superior performance as compared to hard selection, and the interelement spacing is closely related to the effectiveness of antenna selection. Our work further reveals that, when the effect of mutual coupling is concerned, it is still possible to achieve better spectral efficiency by placing a few more than necessary antenna elements in user equipment and applying an appropriate antenna selection approach than plainly implementing the conventional MIMO system without antenna selection.

[1]  M. J. Gans,et al.  On Limits of Wireless Communications in a Fading Environment when Using Multiple Antennas , 1998, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[2]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Reduced-complexity transmit/receive-diversity systems , 2001 .

[3]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Reduced-complexity transmit/receive-diversity systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[4]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Analysis of hybrid selection/maximal-ratio combining in Rayleigh fading , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Communications (Cat. No. 99CH36311).

[5]  R.S. Blum,et al.  On the Importance of Modeling the Mutual Coupling for Antenna Selection for Closely-Spaced Arrays , 2006, 2006 40th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[6]  Joseph M. Kahn,et al.  Fading correlation and its effect on the capacity of multielement antenna systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  R. King Electromagnetic waves and antennas above and below the surface of the earth , 1979 .

[8]  Jun-ichi Takada,et al.  Incorporation of RF-adaptive array antenna into MIMO receivers , 2003, 2003 IEEE Topical Conference on Wireless Communication Technology.

[9]  Constantine A. Balanis,et al.  Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design , 1982 .

[10]  A.F. Molisch,et al.  MIMO systems with antenna selection , 2004, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[11]  Arogyaswami Paulraj,et al.  Receive antenna selection for MIMO spatial multiplexing: theory and algorithms , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[12]  Michael A. Jensen,et al.  Mutual coupling in MIMO wireless systems: a rigorous network theory analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[13]  A.F. Molisch,et al.  Variable-phase-shift-based RF-baseband codesign for MIMO antenna selection , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  L. Trefethen,et al.  Numerical linear algebra , 1997 .

[15]  Preben E. Mogensen,et al.  A stochastic MIMO radio channel model with experimental validation , 2002, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[16]  M. J. Gans Channel capacity between antenna Arrays-part I: sky noise dominates , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[17]  Christian Waldschmidt,et al.  Complete RF system model for analysis of compact MIMO arrays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  Sun-Yuan Kung,et al.  DFT-based hybrid antenna selection schemes for spatially correlated MIMO channels , 2003, 14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003..

[19]  G. Burel,et al.  Soft vs. hard antenna selection based on the minimum distance for MIMO systems , 2002, Conference Record of the Thirty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002..

[20]  H. El-Sallabi,et al.  Effect of Mutual Coupling on Capacity of MIMO Wireless Channels in High SNR Scenario , 2006 .

[21]  Claude Oestges,et al.  Impact of fading correlations on MIMO communication systems in geometry-based statistical channel models , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[22]  Di Lu,et al.  Receive antenna selection scheme for V-BLAST with mutual coupling in correlated channels , 2008, 2008 IEEE 19th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[23]  M. J. Gans,et al.  Channel Capacity Between Antenna Arrays— Part II: Amplifier Noise Dominates , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[24]  R. Janaswamy Effect of element mutual coupling on the capacity of fixed length linear arrays , 2002, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[25]  Andreas F. Molisch,et al.  FFT-based hybrid antenna selection schemes for spatially correlated MIMO channels , 2004, IEEE Communications Letters.