Design and Fabrication of Addressable Microfluidic Energy Storage MEMS Device

Design and fabrication of microfluidic energy storage devices that are based on the control of the liquid electrolyte inside a power cell are presented. A 12-cell array of individually addressable reserve microbatteries has been built and tested, yielding ~ 10-mAh capacity per each cell in the array. Lithium and manganese dioxide or carbon monofluoride (Li/MnO2 and Li/CFx) have been used as anode and cathode in the battery with LiClO4 -based electrolyte. Inherent power management capabilities allow for sequential single cell activation based on the external electronic trigger. The design is based on the superlyophobic porous membrane that keeps liquid electrolyte away from the solid electrode materials. When power is needed, battery activation (a single cell or several cells at once) is accomplished via electrowetting trigger that promotes electrolyte permeation through the porous membrane and wetting of the electrode stack, which combines the chemistry together to release stored electrochemical energy. The membrane and associated package elements are prepared using microelectromechanical system fabrication methods that are described in details along with the assembly methods.

[1]  Nagesh R. Basavanhally,et al.  Superhydrophobic membranes with electrically controllable permeability and their application to “smart” microbatteries , 2008 .

[2]  G. Stemme,et al.  Room-Temperature Sealing of Microcavities by Cold Metal Welding , 2009, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[3]  R. Gutmann,et al.  Adhesive wafer bonding , 2006 .

[4]  Manjeet Dhindsa,et al.  Electrowetting on Superhydrophobic Surfaces: Present Status and Prospects , 2008 .

[5]  V. Lifton,et al.  Preparation and electrowetting transitions on superhydrophobic/hydrophilic bi-layer structures , 2011 .

[6]  Jun Liu,et al.  Electrochemical energy storage for green grid. , 2011, Chemical reviews.

[7]  Steve Simon,et al.  Reserve battery architecture based on superhydrophobic nanostructured surfaces , 2005, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[8]  Robert Bogue,et al.  MEMS sensors: past, present and future , 2007 .

[9]  V. Lifton,et al.  Robust Si-Based Membranes for Fluid Control in Microbatteries Using Superlyophobic Nanostructures , 2011, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[10]  D. Erickson,et al.  Integrated microfluidic devices , 2004 .

[11]  S. M. Spearing,et al.  Fabrication of wafer-level thermocompression bonds , 2002 .

[12]  B. Scrosati,et al.  Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future , 2010 .

[13]  M. Winter,et al.  What are batteries, fuel cells, and supercapacitors? , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[14]  K. M. Knowles,et al.  Anodic bonding , 2006 .

[15]  T. Salamon,et al.  Nanonails: a simple geometrical approach to electrically tunable superlyophobic surfaces. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  J. Baret,et al.  Electrowetting: from basics to applications , 2005 .

[17]  C. O'Mathúna,et al.  Factors influencing adhesion of fluorocarbon (FC) thin film on silicon substrate , 2008 .

[18]  Shu Yang,et al.  From rolling ball to complete wetting: the dynamic tuning of liquids on nanostructured surfaces. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[19]  N. F. de Rooij,et al.  Microfluidics meets MEMS , 2003, Proc. IEEE.

[20]  Gareth H McKinley,et al.  Robust omniphobic surfaces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.