Scenario Modelling in Prospective LCA of Transport Systems. Application of Formative Scenario Analysis (11 pp)

AbstractBackground Tools and methods able to cope with uncertainties are essential for improving the credibility of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a decision support tool. Previous approaches have focussed predominately upon data quality. Objectiveand Scope. An epistemological approach is presented conceptualising uncertainties in a comparative, prospective, attributional LCA. This is achieved by considering a set of cornerstone scenarios representing future developments of an entire Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) product system. We illustrate the method using a comparison of future transport systems. Method Scenario modelling is organized by means of Formative Scenario Analysis (FSA), which provides a set of possible and consistent scenarios of those unit processes of an LCI product system which are time dependent and of environmental importance. Scenarios are combinations of levels of socio-economic or technological impact variables. Two core elements of FSA are applied in LCI scenario modelling. So-called impact matrix analysis is applied to determine the relationship between unit process specific socio-economic variables and technology variables. Consistency Analysis is employed to integrate unit process scenarios, based on pair-wise ratings of the consistency of the levels of socio-economic impact variables of all unit processes. Two software applications are employed which are available from the authors. Results and Discussion The study reveals that each possible level or development of a technology variable is best conceived of as the impact of a specific socio-economic (sub-) scenario. This allows for linking possible future technology options within the socio-economic context of the future development of various background processes. In an illustrative case study, the climate change scores and nitrogen dioxide scores per seat kilometre for six technology options of regional rail transport are compared. Similar scores are calculated for a future bus alternative and an average Swiss car. The scenarios are deliberately chosen to maximise diversity. That is, they represent the entire range of future possible developments. Reference data and the unit process structure are taken from the Swiss LCA database 'ecoinvent 2000'. The results reveal that rail transport remains the best option for future regional transport in Switzerland. In all four assessed scenarios, four technology options of future rail transport perform considerably better than regional bus transport and car transport. Conclusionsand Recommendations. The case study demonstrates the general feasibility of the developed approach for attributional prospective LCA. It allows for a focussed and in-depth analysis of the future development of each single unit process, while still accounting for the requirements of the final scenario integration. Due to its high transparency, the procedure supports the validation of LCI results. Furthermore, it is well-suited for incorporation into participatory methods so as to increase their credibility.Outlookand Future Work. Thus far, the proposed approach is only applied on a vehicle level not taking into account alterations in demand and use of different transport modes. Future projects will enhance the approach by tackling uncertainties in technology assessment of future transport systems. For instance, environmental interventions involving future maglev technology will be assessed so as to account for induced traffic generated by the introduction of a new transport system.

[1]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Assessing future energy and transport systems: the case of fuel cells , 2003 .

[2]  R. Frischknecht,et al.  A special view on the nature of the allocation problem , 1998 .

[3]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 1) , 1992 .

[4]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy , 1990 .

[5]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuel cell vehicles a methodology example of input data treatment for future technologies , 2002 .

[6]  Rolf Frischknecht.  Life cycle inventory analysis for decision-making , 1998 .

[7]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Survey of approaches to improve reliability in lca , 2002 .

[8]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one-family dwelling. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  K.-M. Nigge,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Natural Gas Vehicles: Development and Application of Site-Dependent Impact Indicators , 2000 .

[10]  Jürgen Gausemeier,et al.  Szenario-management : Planen und Führen mit Szenarien , 1995 .

[11]  Michel Godet,et al.  Introduction to la prospective: Seven key ideas and one scenario method☆ , 1986 .

[12]  Olaf Tietje,et al.  Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenarios , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Masahiko Hirao,et al.  A structured framework and language for scenario-based Life Cycle assessment , 2002 .

[14]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Identification of key issues for further investigation in improving the reliability of life-cycle assessments , 1996 .

[15]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The ecoinvent Database: Overview and Methodological Framework (7 pp) , 2005 .

[16]  Remi B. Coulon,et al.  Data quality and uncertainty in LCI , 1997 .

[17]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA , 1998 .

[18]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[19]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Framework for scenario development in LCA , 2000 .

[20]  W. van Rijckeghem,et al.  An Exact Method for Determining the Technology Matrix in a Situation with Secondary Products , 1967 .

[21]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Data quality of life cycle inventory data — rules of thumb , 1998 .