Maximum Flux Transition Paths of Conformational Change.

Given two metastable states A and B of a biomolecular system, the problem is to calculate the likely paths of the transition from A to B. Such a calculation is more informative and more manageable if done for a reduced set of collective variables chosen so that paths cluster in collective variable space. The computational task becomes that of computing the "center" of such a cluster. A good way to define the center employs the concept of a committor, whose value at a point in collective variable space is the probability that a trajectory at that point will reach B before A. The committor "foliates" the transition region into a set of isocommittors. The maximum flux transition path is defined as a path that crosses each isocommittor at a point which (locally) has the highest crossing rate of distinct reactive trajectories. This path is based on the same principle as the minimum resistance path of Berkowitz et al (1983), but it has two advantages: (i) the path is invariant with respect to a change of coordinates in collective variable space and (ii) the differential equations that define the path are simpler. It is argued that such a path is nearer to an ideal path than others that have been proposed with the possible exception of the finite-temperature string method path. To make the calculation tractable, three approximations are introduced, yielding a path that is the solution of a nonsingular two-point boundary-value problem. For such a problem, one can construct a simple and robust algorithm. One such algorithm and its performance is discussed.

[1]  John D. Morgan,et al.  Diffusion‐controlled reactions: A variational formula for the optimum reaction coordinate , 1983 .

[2]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: Limitations of gas‐phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[3]  Berend Smit,et al.  Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications , 1996 .

[4]  He Huang,et al.  A Comparison of Three Perturbation Molecular Dynamics Methods for Modeling Conformational Transitions. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[5]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Revisiting the finite temperature string method for the calculation of reaction tubes and free energies. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  David Chandler,et al.  Transition path sampling: throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark. , 2002, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[7]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Reaction paths based on mean first-passage times , 2003 .

[8]  L. Onsager Initial Recombination of Ions , 1938 .

[9]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  String method in collective variables: minimum free energy paths and isocommittor surfaces. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[11]  J. Straub,et al.  The MaxFlux algorithm for calculating variationally optimized reaction paths for conformational transitions in many body systems at finite temperature , 1997 .

[12]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Atomistic view of the conformational activation of Src kinase using the string method with swarms-of-trajectories. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Finding transition pathways using the string method with swarms of trajectories. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[14]  E. Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Metastability, conformation dynamics, and transition pathways in complex systems , 2004 .

[15]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[16]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[17]  Philipp Metzner,et al.  Illustration of transition path theory on a collection of simple examples. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  V. Pande,et al.  Error analysis and efficient sampling in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[19]  W. E,et al.  Towards a Theory of Transition Paths , 2006 .

[20]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[21]  P. Krüger,et al.  Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions. , 1994, Journal of molecular graphics.

[22]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Simplified and improved string method for computing the minimum energy paths in barrier-crossing events. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[24]  Ron Elber,et al.  On the assumptions underlying milestoning. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  Carol Beth Post,et al.  An electrostatic network and long‐range regulation of Src kinases , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[26]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Mapping the conformational transition in Src activation by cumulating the information from multiple molecular dynamics trajectories , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Elif Ozkirimli,et al.  Src kinase activation: A switched electrostatic network , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[28]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  Transition pathways in complex systems: Application of the finite-temperature string method to the alanine dipeptide. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[29]  Ming Lei,et al.  Sampling protein conformations and pathways , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[30]  Ron Elber,et al.  Calculation of classical trajectories with a very large time step: Formalism and numerical examples , 1996 .

[31]  H. Jónsson,et al.  Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions , 1998 .

[32]  C. Dellago,et al.  Reaction coordinates of biomolecular isomerization. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[34]  N. Gray,et al.  Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  Aaron R Dinner,et al.  Automatic method for identifying reaction coordinates in complex systems. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[36]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[37]  Eric Vanden-Eijnden,et al.  The geometric minimum action method for computing minimum energy paths. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.