Assessing Measurement Invariance of Export Market Orientation: A Study of Chinese and Non-Chinese Firms in China

In response to numerous calls for the cross-cultural validation of measures used in international research, the authors assess measurement invariance of the export market orientation (EMO) and export performance (EP) constructs using 491 Chinese and non-Chinese export ventures in China. The results show that both the EMO and the EP scales are invariant between Chinese and non-Chinese export ventures. In addition, different EMO components have differential effects on EP for Chinese versus non-Chinese firms. To achieve higher EP, Chinese firms should focus on export intelligence responsiveness, and non-Chinese firms should concentrate their efforts on export intelligence generation. The authors discuss implications and suggest directions for further research.

[1]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[2]  Ahmet H. Kirca,et al.  Market Orientation: A Meta-Analytic Review and Assessment of its Antecedents and Impact on Performance , 2005 .

[3]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  Recent Issues Regarding rWG, rWG, rWG(J), and rWG(J) , 2005 .

[4]  Kwaku Atuahene-Gima,et al.  Antecedents and Outcomes of Marketing Strategy Comprehensiveness , 2004 .

[5]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[6]  G. Akehurst,et al.  An investigation of export performance variations related to corporate export market orientation , 2003 .

[7]  G. Lilien,et al.  Informants in Organizational Marketing Research: Why Use Multiple Informants and how to Aggregate Responses , 2002 .

[8]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Export Market-oriented Activities: Their Antecedents and Performance Consequences , 2002 .

[9]  G. Rose,et al.  Export performance and market orientation: establishing an empirical link , 2002 .

[10]  Risto T. Salminen,et al.  Key antecedents to "export" market-oriented behaviors: a cross-national empirical examination , 2001 .

[11]  John Child,et al.  China's Transition and its Implications for International Business , 2001 .

[12]  Joseph O. Rentz,et al.  A refinement and validation of the MARKOR scale , 2000 .

[13]  Michael Y. Hu,et al.  Market orientation among small Korean exporters , 2000 .

[14]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  A Measure of Export Market Orientation: Scale Development and Cross-cultural Validation , 1999 .

[15]  E. Oczkowski,et al.  Discriminating between measurement scales using non-nested tests and two-stage least squares estimators: The case of market orientation , 1998 .

[16]  Saeed Samiee,et al.  International Strategy Research: Cross-Cultural Methodology Implications , 1998 .

[17]  Gregory E. Osland,et al.  The EXPERF Scale: A Cross-National Generalized Export Performance Measure , 1998 .

[18]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[19]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[20]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  Controlling Supplier Opportunism in Industrial Relationships , 1996 .

[21]  Barry J. Naughton China's Emergence and Prospects as a Trading Nation , 1996 .

[22]  Michael R. Mullen Diagnosing Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[23]  Jagdip Singh,et al.  Measurement Issues in Cross-National Research , 1995 .

[24]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  Narver and Slater, Kohli and Jaworski and the market orientation construct: integration and internationalization , 1995 .

[25]  S. Cavusgil,et al.  Marketing Strategy-Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures , 1994 .

[26]  J. Horn,et al.  A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. , 1992, Experimental aging research.

[27]  Donald R. Lichtenstein,et al.  A Cross-National Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the CETSCALE , 1991 .

[28]  Donald R. Lichtenstein,et al.  A Cross-National Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the CETSCALE: , 1991 .

[29]  Jennifer M. George,et al.  Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. , 1990 .

[30]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications , 1990 .

[31]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[32]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[33]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[34]  H. Triandis,et al.  Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology , 1985 .

[35]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[36]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[37]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .