Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus
暂无分享,去创建一个
Reinhold Kliegl | John Hale | Shravan Vasishth | Umesh Patil | Marisa Ferrara Boston | R. Kliegl | S. Vasishth | Umesh Patil | J. Hale
[1] E. Wagenmakers,et al. AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[2] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[3] Joakim Nivre,et al. Inductive Dependency Parsing , 2006, Text, speech and language technology.
[4] M. Coltheart. Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .
[5] Mark Steedman,et al. The nite connectivity of linguistic structure , 1999 .
[6] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[7] Glyn Morrill,et al. Incremental processing and acceptability , 2000, CL.
[8] Robin K. Morris,et al. The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited , 2003 .
[9] D. Mitchell,et al. Absence of real evidence against competition during syntactic ambiguity resolution , 2006 .
[10] Keith Hall,et al. K-best Spanning Tree Parsing , 2007, ACL.
[11] Lucien Tesnière. Éléments de syntaxe structurale , 1959 .
[12] Eugene Charniak,et al. Coarse-to-Fine n-Best Parsing and MaxEnt Discriminative Reranking , 2005, ACL.
[13] Wilson L. Taylor,et al. “Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability , 1953 .
[14] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.
[15] Wolfgang Lezius,et al. The TIGER language. - A Description Language for Syntax Graphs , 2000 .
[16] Chris Brew,et al. A Finite-State Model of Human Sentence Processing , 2006, ACL.
[17] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Processing Polarity: How the Ungrammatical Intrudes on the Grammatical , 2008, Cogn. Sci..
[18] H. Akaike,et al. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .
[19] K. Kraus,et al. The DWDS corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20 century , 2006 .
[20] D. G. Hays. Dependency Theory: A Formalism and Some Observations , 1964 .
[21] Daniel Jurafsky,et al. A Probabilistic Model of Lexical and Syntactic Access and Disambiguation , 1996, Cogn. Sci..
[22] Frank Keller,et al. Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity , 2008, Cognition.
[23] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[24] R. Shillcock,et al. Low-level predictive inference in reading: the influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements , 2003, Vision Research.
[25] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Argument-Head Distance and Processing Complexity: Explaining both Locality and Antilocality Effects , 2006 .
[26] Bradley P. Carlin,et al. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .
[27] Wojciech Skut,et al. An Annotation Scheme for Free Word Order Languages , 1997, ANLP.
[28] Ralf Engbert,et al. Tracking the mind during reading: the influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[29] David C. Plaut,et al. A connectionist model of sentence comprehension and production , 2002 .
[30] G. A. Miller,et al. Finitary models of language users , 1963 .
[31] Andrew Gelman,et al. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .
[32] K. Rayner,et al. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .
[33] K. Rayner,et al. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[34] Alexis Nasr,et al. Pseudo-Projectivity, A Polynomially Parsable Non-Projective Dependency Grammar , 1998, ACL.
[35] Ronald M. Kaplan,et al. Augmented Transition Networks as Psychological Models of Sentence Comprehension , 1971, IJCAI.
[36] Ralf Engbert,et al. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading , 2004 .
[37] Elizabeth Bates,et al. Contextual effects on word production: A lifespan study , 2000, Memory & cognition.
[38] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[39] K. Rayner,et al. Eye movements in reading words and sentences , 2007 .
[40] John Hale,et al. Uncertainty About the Rest of the Sentence , 2006, Cogn. Sci..
[41] Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al. Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .
[42] Matthias Buch-Kromann,et al. Dependency-based machine translation and parallel parsing without the projectivity and edge-factoring assumptions. A white paper , 2007 .
[43] John Hale,et al. A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.
[44] Frank Keller,et al. A Probabilistic Parser as a Model of Global Processing Difficulty , 2003 .
[45] J. Hale,et al. Garden-Pathing in a Statistical Dependency Parser , 2007 .
[46] James H. Martin,et al. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition , 2000 .
[47] Edward Gibson,et al. A computational theory of human linguistic processing: memory limitations and processing breakdown , 1991 .
[48] M W Crocker,et al. Wide-Coverage Probabilistic Sentence Processing , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[49] D. Bates,et al. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .
[50] Andreas Stolcke,et al. An Efficient Probabilistic Context-Free Parsing Algorithm that Computes Prefix Probabilities , 1994, CL.