Sickness behavior in dairy cows during Escherichia coli mastitis.

The consequences of mastitis in terms of dairy cow behavior are relatively unknown. Future assessment of dairy cow welfare during mastitis will be facilitated by knowledge about the potential of mastitis to induce sickness behavior. Our aim was to examine behavior of dairy cows in the period from 2 d before (d -2 and -1) to 3 d (d 0, 1, and 2) after experimental intramammary challenge with Escherichia coli. Effects of experimentally induced mastitis on behavior were examined in 20 primiparous Danish Holstein-Friesian cows, all 3 to 6 wk after calving and kept in tie stalls. After evening milking on d 0, each cow received an intramammary infusion with 20 to 40 cfu of E. coli in 1 healthy front quarter. Paraclinical and bacteriological examinations were conducted to confirm infection. Half of the cows were subjected to liver and udder biopsies twice during the trial. Behavior was video-recorded on 5 consecutive days, d -2 to +2 after challenge when the cows were not disturbed by humans. The behavior of the animals was compared among all days. Infection with E. coli altered the behavior of the dairy cows. Time spent feeding was lower in the initial 24 h after infection compared with that on the other days (16.6±1.1, 16.5±1.0, 13.2±1.2, 18.1±1.1, and 16.0±0.8% of time for d -2, -1, 0, 1, and 2, respectively). The duration of standing idle increased on d 0 compared with that on the control days and d 1 and 2 (29.4±2.6, 28.0±2.3, 39.1±2.6, 31.4±3.8, and 25.9±2.6% of time for d -2, -1, 0, 1 and 2, respectively). The frequency of self-grooming behavior per hour decreased in the initial 24h compared with that on d -2, -1, and 2 (4.1±0.8, 5.4±1.9, 3.2±0.6, 3.6±0.6, and 4.8±1.0 for d -2, -1, 0, 1, and 2, respectively). Likewise, duration of rumination and frequency of turning the head against the udder decreased in the first days after infection (rumination: 32.2±1.6, 34.8±1.8, 27.9±1.7, 30.0±2.6, and 34.8±1.7% of time; and frequency of turning head: 0.6±0.1, 0.6±0.1, 0.3±0.1, 0.3±0.1, and 0.6±0.1 per hour for d -2, -1, 0, 1 and 2, respectively). The cows subjected to biopsies showed an overall decreased lying time during the entire observation period (36.3±1.5 vs. 46.1±2.2% of time) but not directly related to the period after the biopsies. Dairy cows show classic signs of illness behavior in the hours after intramammary challenge with E. coli. This knowledge can be useful for the development of welfare assessment protocols, early disease detection, and for future work aimed at understanding the behavioral needs of dairy cows suffering from mastitis.

[1]  A. Brand,et al.  Effect of dexamethasone on experimental Escherichia coli mastitis in the cow. , 1988, Journal of dairy science.

[2]  M. Coffey,et al.  Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  C. Krohn Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments. III. Grooming, exploration and abnormal behaviour , 1994 .

[4]  Stefan M. Edwards,et al.  In depth analysis of genes and pathways of the mammary gland involved in the pathogenesis of bovine Escherichia coli-mastitis , 2011, BMC Genomics.

[5]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Prior deprivation and reward duration affect the demand function for rest in dairy heifers , 2004 .

[6]  Nathalie Bareille,et al.  Effects of health disorders on feed intake and milk production in dairy cows , 2003 .

[7]  Rodney W. Johnson,et al.  The concept of sickness behavior: a brief chronological account of four key discoveries. , 2002, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[8]  R. Dantzer,et al.  Named Series: Twenty Years of Brain, Behavior, and Immunity Twenty years of research on cytokine-induced sickness behavior , 2007 .

[9]  David Fraser,et al.  Identifying and preventing pain in animals , 2006 .

[10]  C. Krohn,et al.  Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments II. Lying and lying-down behaviour , 1993 .

[11]  L. Pedersen,et al.  The effect of reward duration on demand functions for rest in dairy heifers and lying requirements as measured by demand functions , 2005 .

[12]  L. Sordillo,et al.  Concentrations of alpha-Tocopherol after intramammary infusion of Escherichia coli or lipopolysaccharide. , 1997, Journal of dairy science.

[13]  Donald M. Broom,et al.  Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology , 2006 .

[14]  M. Herskin,et al.  Changes in thermal nociceptive responses in dairy cows following experimentally induced Escherichia coli mastitis , 2011, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[15]  Matti Pastell,et al.  Impact of acute clinical mastitis on cow behaviour , 2011 .

[16]  N. Kemper,et al.  Coliform mastitis in sows: a review. , 2009 .

[17]  Satu Pyörälä,et al.  Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[18]  D. Weary,et al.  Feeding behavior identifies dairy cows at risk for metritis. , 2005, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  A. Aubert,et al.  Sickness and behaviour in animals: a motivational perspective , 1999, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[20]  A. Bradley Bovine mastitis: an evolving disease. , 2002, Veterinary journal.

[21]  B. Hart Biological basis of the behavior of sick animals , 1988, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[22]  T. Kikusui,et al.  Changes in the behavioral parameters following the lipopolysaccharide administration in goats. , 1995, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[23]  D M Weary,et al.  Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  C. Røntved,et al.  Cytokine and acute phase protein gene expression in repeated liver biopsies of dairy cows with a lipopolysaccharide-induced mastitis. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[25]  M. Herskin,et al.  Short communication: rising and lying behavior of heifers before and after alimentary oligofructose overload. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.