MPOCs’ Learner Interaction (MPOCsLI): An Instrument Design and Construct Validation Study

In online learning, especially in MPOCs, interaction is considered an important factor that influences learning outcomes and learner achievement. However, few researchers have attempted to derive a valid and reliable scale of learner interaction in MPOCs; thus measuring learner interaction continues to be challenging. In this study, the MPOCsLI scale was constructed and validated using Exploratory Factor Analysis. Three distinct and reliable dimensions of learner interaction in MPOCs emerged: LearnerInstructor, Learner-Learner, and Learner-Content. Evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity was reported.

[1]  K. Hew,et al.  Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges , 2014 .

[2]  Ben Kei Daniel,et al.  Big Data in Higher Education: The Big Picture , 2017 .

[3]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  e-Learning and the Science of Instruction , 2016 .

[4]  Jorge J. Wellmann.  The National Survey of Student Engagement , 2010 .

[5]  M. Kang,et al.  Factors of learner-instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[6]  John Morgan,et al.  Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  Eva Mary Bures,et al.  Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[8]  D. Jonassen,et al.  Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving , 2001 .

[9]  Dongsong Zhang,et al.  Interactive Multimedia-Based E-Learning: A Study of Effectiveness , 2005 .

[10]  Marcy Reisetter,et al.  The Impact of Altered Realties: Implications of Online Delivery for Learners’ Interactions, Expectations, and Learning Skills , 2007 .

[11]  Phil Wood.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2008 .

[12]  V. Dennen,et al.  Instructor–Learner Interaction in Online Courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction , 2007 .

[13]  Karen Swan,et al.  Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses , 2001 .

[14]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Using Technology to Assist in Realizing Effective Learning and Instruction: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning , 1994 .

[15]  Scott W. Campbell,et al.  Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviors and medium , 2004 .

[16]  L. S. Vygotksy.  Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[17]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[18]  Howard B. Lee,et al.  A first course in factor analysis , 1973 .

[19]  L. Vygotsky.  Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[20]  Dan Bouhnik,et al.  Interaction in distance-learning courses , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .

[22]  J. D. Baker,et al.  Interaction and Immediacy in Online Learning , 2004 .

[23]  L. Davis,et al.  Comparison of student outcomes and preferences in a traditional vs. World Wide Web-based baccalaureate nursing research course. , 2000, The Journal of nursing education.

[24]  Wenge Guo.  From SPOC to MPOC -- The Effective Practice of Peking University Online Teacher Training , 2014, 2014 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology.

[25]  James W. Peltier,et al.  Interaction and virtual learning , 2004 .

[26]  Katrina A. Meyer,et al.  FACE-TO-FACE VERSUS THREADED DISCUSSIONS: THE ROLE OF TIME AND HIGHER-ORDER THINKING , 2019, Online Learning.

[27]  M. Moore,et al.  Distance education: a system view , 1996 .

[28]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs, SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster , 2016 .

[29]  Eva Dakich,et al.  Frequency and pattern of learner-instructor interaction in an online English language learning environment in Vietnam , 2014 .

[30]  Judy Kay,et al.  Mining patterns of events in students’ teamwork data , 2006 .

[31]  Russell Lee,et al.  Learner Perceptions of Online Interaction , 2002 .

[32]  M. Moore.  Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[33]  V. A. Thurmond.  Examination of Interaction Variables as Predictors of Students' Satisfaction and Willingness to Enroll in Future Web-Based Courses While Controlling for Student Characteristics , 2003 .

[34]  Jeffery C. Andersen.  Learner Satisfaction in Online Learning: An Analysis of the Perceived Impact of Learner-Social Media and Learner-Instructor Interaction , 2013 .