Dynamics of Inventor Networks and the Evolution of Technology Clusters

Clusters are important drivers of regional economic growth. Although their benefits are well recognized, research into their evolution is still ongoing. Most real-world clusters seem to have emerged spontaneously without deliberate policy interventions, each cluster having its own evolutionary path. Since there is a significant gap in our understanding of the forces driving their evolution, this study uses a quantitative approach to investigate the role of inventor collaboration networks in it. Inventor collaboration networks for 30 top-performing American metropolitan clusters were constructed on the basis of patent co-authorship data. The selected clusters operate in hi-tech fields: information technology, communications equipment and the biopharmaceutical industry. Starting from a widely accepted hypothesis that the ‘small-world’ structure is an optimal one for knowledge spillovers and promotes innovation effectively, the authors statistically tested the impact of ‘small-world’ network properties on cluster innovation performance proxied by patent output. The results suggest that the effect of the small-world structure is not as significant as theorists hypothesized, not all clusters benefit from the presence of inventor collaboration networks, and cluster performance can be affected by policy interventions. Our analyses also suggest that cluster typology moderates the impact of inventor network properties on cluster innovation performance.

[1]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[2]  A. Markusen Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts* , 1996 .

[3]  José Lobo,et al.  Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects , 2008 .

[4]  Jiang He,et al.  Is Inventors Network Structure a Predictor of Cluster Evolution? , 2007, PICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[5]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[6]  L. Fleming,et al.  Why the Valley Went First: Agglomeration and Emergence in Regional Inventor Networks , 2004 .

[7]  Johannes Glückler Economic Geography and the Evolution of Networks , 2007 .

[8]  Bennett Harrison,et al.  Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles? , 1992 .

[9]  Jan Schnellenbach,et al.  What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature , 2006 .

[10]  M. Dunford,et al.  Industrial Districts, Magic Circles, and the Restructuring of the Italian Textiles and Clothing Chain , 2006 .

[11]  Luciana Lazzeretti,et al.  City of art as a High Culture local system and cultural districtualization processes: the cluster of art restoration in Florence , 2003 .

[12]  M. Fromhold-Eisebith,et al.  How to institutionalize innovative clusters? Comparing explicit top-down and implicit bottom-up approaches , 2005 .

[13]  Sebastiano Brusco The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration , 1982 .

[14]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Network Structure and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 2004 .

[16]  Arthur P. Becker,et al.  Psychological Production and Conservation , 1949 .

[17]  Jiangen He,et al.  Dynamics of Inventors' Network and Growth of Geographic Clusters: Evidence from Telecommunications Industry in NJ & TX , 2006, 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future - PICMET 2006 Conference.

[18]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[19]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[20]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Collaboration and Creativity: The Small World Problem1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  J. Howells Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Technology Transfer. , 1996 .

[22]  Edward E. Leamer,et al.  The Economic Geography of the Internet Age , 2001 .

[23]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  Collective Order and Economic Coordination in Industrial Agglomerations: The Technopoles of Southern California , 1990 .

[24]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[25]  Dominic Power,et al.  Putting Porter into Practice? Practices of Regional Cluster Building: Evidence from Sweden , 2002 .

[26]  David A. Wolfe,et al.  Clusters from the Inside and Out: Local Dynamics and Global Linkages , 2004 .

[27]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[29]  H. Bathelt,et al.  Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation , 2004 .

[30]  S. Breschi,et al.  Knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets , 2004 .

[31]  Reginald D. Smith The network of collaboration among rappers and its community structure , 2005, physics/0511215.

[32]  A. Malmberg,et al.  The Elusive Concept of Localization Economies: Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of Spatial Clustering , 2002 .

[33]  B. Nooteboom,et al.  Density and strength of ties in innovation networks: an analysis of multimedia and biotechnology , 2005 .

[34]  M. Porter Location, Competition, and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy , 2000 .

[35]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Collaborative Networks as Determinants of Knowledge Diffusion Patterns , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[37]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY AND TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT: THE RISE OF THE ORANGE COUNTY COMPLEX, 1955–1984 , 1986 .

[38]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Invention in the city: Increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size , 2007 .

[39]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  The Small worlds of Strategic Technology Alliances , 2004 .

[40]  S. Iammarino,et al.  The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers , 2006 .

[41]  P. Morosini Industrial Clusters, Knowledge Integration and Performance , 2004 .

[42]  P. McCann,et al.  Industrial Clusters: Complexes, Agglomeration and/or Social Networks? , 2000, Urban Studies.

[43]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[44]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.