Impact of pharmacometrics on drug approval and labeling decisions: A survey of 42 new drug applications

The value of quantitative thinking in drug development and regulatory review is increasingly being appreciated. Modeling and simulation of data pertaining to pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease progression is often referred to as the pharmacometrics analyses. The objective of the current report is to assess the role of pharmacometrics at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in making drug approval and labeling decisions. The New Drug Applications (NDAs) submitted between 2000 and 2004 to the Cardio-renal, Oncology, and Neuropharmacology drug products divisions were surveyed. For those NDA reviews that included a pharmacometrics consultation, the clinical pharmacology scientists ranked the impact on the regulatory decision(s). Of about a total of 244 NDAs, 42 included a pharmacometrics component. Review of NDAs involved independent, quantitative evaluation by FDA pharmacometricians, even when such analysis was not conducted by the sponsor. Pharmacometric analyses were pivotal in regulatory decision making in more than half of the 42 NDAs. Of the 14 reviews that were pivotal to approval related decisions, 5 identified the need for additional trials, whereas 6 reduced the burden of conducting additional trials. Collaboration among the FDA clinical pharmacology, medical, and statistical reviewers and effective communication with the sponsors was critical for the impact to occur. The survey and the case studies emphasize the need for early interaction between the FDA and sponsors to plan the development more efficiently by appreciating the regulatory expectations better.

[1]  L. Grochow,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of busulfan: correlation with veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[2]  Carl Peck,et al.  An Evaluation of the Integration of Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles in Clinical Drug Development , 1997, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[3]  J R Koup,et al.  Impact of Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analyses on the Drug Development Process , 2000, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[4]  T. LeJemtel,et al.  Intravenous nesiritide, a natriuretic peptide, in the treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure. Nesiritide Study Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  H. Deeg,et al.  Marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: the influence of plasma busulfan levels on the outcome of transplantation. , 1997, Blood.

[6]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  M. Gastonguay,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Sotalol in Pediatric Patients with Supraventricular or Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia , 2001, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[8]  James B. Young Intravenous nesiritide vs nitroglycerin for treatment of decompensated congestive heart failure: A randomized controlled trial , 2002 .

[9]  A. Donnenberg,et al.  Toxicity of busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BU/CY2) in patients with hematologic malignancies. , 1996, Bone marrow transplantation.

[10]  J. Beitz,et al.  Renal failure with the use of zoledronic acid. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.