A Hybrid Non-invasive Method for the Classification of Amputee’s Hand and Wrist Movements

The quest to develop dexterous artificial arm which supports multiple degrees of freedom for amputees has attracted a lot of study interest in the last few decades. The outcome of some of the studies had identified surface Electromyography (EMG) as the most commonly used biological signal in predicting the motion intention of an amputee. Different EMG based control methods for multifunctional prosthesis have been proposed and investigated in a number of previous studies. However, no any multifunctional prostheses are clinically available yet. One of the possible reasons would be that the residual muscles after amputations might not produce sufficient EMG signals for movement classifications. In this study, we proposed to use electroencephalography (EEG) signals recorded from the scalp of an amputee as additional signals for motion identifications. The performance of a hybrid scheme based on the combination of EMG and EEG signals in identifying different hand and wrist movements was evaluated in one transhumeral amputee. Our pilot results showed that the proposed hybrid method increased the classification accuracy in identifying different hand and wrist movements of the amputee. This suggests that the proposed method may have potential to improve the control of multifunctional prostheses.

[1]  Adrian D. C. Chan,et al.  A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Ferat Sahin,et al.  Pattern recognition with surface EMG signal based wavelet transformation , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[3]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control. , 2011, Communications of the ACM.

[4]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[5]  J C Rothwell,et al.  EMG-EEG correlation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[6]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Myoelectric control systems - A survey , 2007, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[7]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Principal Components Analysis Preprocessing for Improved Classification Accuracies in Pattern-Recognition-Based Myoelectric Control , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Yoshiaki Hayashi,et al.  Towards Hybrid EEG-EMG-Based Control Approaches to be Used in Bio-robotics Applications: Current Status, Challenges and Future Directions , 2013, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[9]  J R Wolpaw,et al.  EEG-based communication and control: short-term role of feedback. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Ricardo Carelli,et al.  Human-machine interfaces based on EMG and EEG applied to robotic systems , 2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[11]  N. Birbaumer Breaking the silence: brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for communication and motor control. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Guanglin Li,et al.  Conditioning and Sampling Issues of EMG Signals in Motion Recognition of Multifunctional Myoelectric Prostheses , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Yoshiaki Hayashi,et al.  Motion Estimation Based on EMG and EEG Signals to Control Wearable Robots , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[14]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.