Personalized Biopsy Schedules Using an Interval-censored Cause-specific Joint Model
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. van der Schaar,et al. Developing machine learning algorithms for dynamic estimation of progression during active surveillance for prostate cancer , 2022, npj Digital Medicine.
[2] A. Semjonow,et al. Artificial Intelligence-Based Prognostic Model for Urologic Cancers: A SEER-Based Study , 2022, Cancers.
[3] D. Nieboer,et al. Shared decision making of burdensome surveillance tests using personalized schedules and their burden and benefit , 2022, Statistics in medicine.
[4] D. Stoppa-Lyonnet,et al. Feasibility of personalized screening and prevention recommendations in the general population through breast cancer risk assessment: results from a dedicated risk clinic , 2022, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[5] K. Salari,et al. A machine learning approach to predict progression on active surveillance for prostate cancer. , 2021, Urologic oncology.
[6] James D. Murphy,et al. Association of Prostate-Specific Antigen Velocity With Clinical Progression Among African American and Non-Hispanic White Men Treated for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer With Active Surveillance , 2021, JAMA network open.
[7] A. Jemal,et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.
[8] M. Guindy,et al. Personalized Screening for Breast Cancer: Rationale, Present Practices, and Future Directions , 2021, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[9] M. Cooperberg,et al. Tailoring Intensity of Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Individualized Prediction of Risk Stability. , 2020, JAMA oncology.
[10] Jun Ma,et al. An optimal posttreatment surveillance strategy for cancer survivors based on an individualized risk-based approach , 2020, Nature Communications.
[11] J. Twisk,et al. Ignoring competing events in the analysis of survival data may lead to biased results: a non-mathematical illustration of competing risk analysis. , 2020, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[12] Giorgos Bakoyannis,et al. Semiparametric competing risks regression under interval censoring using the R package intccr , 2019, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..
[13] P. Troncoso,et al. Active surveillance for prostate and thyroid cancers: evolution in clinical paradigms and lessons learned , 2018, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.
[14] D. Nieboer,et al. Personalized schedules for surveillance of low‐risk prostate cancer patients , 2017, Biometrics.
[15] K. Pienta,et al. Risk prediction tool for grade re‐classification in men with favourable‐risk prostate cancer on active surveillance , 2017, BJU international.
[16] Matthew R. Cooperberg,et al. Epidemiology of prostate cancer , 2017, World Journal of Urology.
[17] E. Heijnsdijk,et al. Estimating the risks and benefits of active surveillance protocols for prostate cancer: a microsimulation study , 2017, BJU international.
[18] Chenxi Li,et al. Cause-specific hazard regression for competing risks data under interval censoring and left truncation , 2016, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..
[19] Eleni-Rosalina Andrinopoulou,et al. Bayesian shrinkage approach for a joint model of longitudinal and survival outcomes assuming different association structures , 2016, Statistics in medicine.
[20] J. Hugosson,et al. Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial. , 2016, European urology.
[21] Ronald C. Chen,et al. Active Surveillance for the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer (Cancer Care Ontario Guideline): American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[22] D. Kuban,et al. Disease reclassification risk with stringent criteria and frequent monitoring in men with favourable‐risk prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance , 2016, BJU international.
[23] John T. Wei,et al. Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prospective, Multi-Institutional Canary PASS Cohort. , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[24] Kirsten L. Greene,et al. Extended followup and risk factors for disease reclassification in a large active surveillance cohort for localized prostate cancer. , 2015, The Journal of urology.
[25] P. Stattin,et al. Five-year nationwide follow-up study of active surveillance for prostate cancer. , 2015, European urology.
[26] Danny Vesprini,et al. Long-term follow-up of a large active surveillance cohort of patients with prostate cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[27] T. Lancet. Active surveillance for early-stage prostate cancer , 2014, The Lancet.
[28] D. Dearnaley,et al. Medium-term outcomes of active surveillance for localised prostate cancer. , 2013, European urology.
[29] K Clint Cary,et al. Biomarkers in prostate cancer surveillance and screening: past, present, and future , 2013, Therapeutic advances in urology.
[30] M. Roobol,et al. Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer worldwide: the PRIAS study. , 2013, European urology.
[31] Turgay Ayer,et al. OR Forum - A POMDP Approach to Personalize Mammography Screening Decisions , 2012, Oper. Res..
[32] Dimitris Rizopoulos,et al. Dynamic Predictions and Prospective Accuracy in Joint Models for Longitudinal and Time‐to‐Event Data , 2011, Biometrics.
[33] Laurent Brisson,et al. Breast cancer risk score: a data mining approach to improve readability , 2011, IEEE ICDM 2011.
[34] Alan W Partin,et al. Active Surveillance Program for Prostate Cancer: An Update of the Johns Hopkins Experience , 2011 .
[35] David S. Yee,et al. Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. , 2011, The Journal of urology.
[36] M. Soloway,et al. Careful selection and close monitoring of low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance minimizes the need for treatment. , 2010, European urology.
[37] P. H. Garthwaite,et al. Adaptive optimal scaling of Metropolis–Hastings algorithms using the Robbins–Monro process , 2010, 1006.3690.
[38] Hemant Ishwaran,et al. Random Survival Forests , 2008, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.
[39] S. Fukuhara,et al. Prospective evaluation of selection criteria for active surveillance in Japanese patients with stage T1cN0M0 prostate cancer. , 2008, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.
[40] James A Hanley,et al. 20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2005, JAMA.
[41] A. Whittemore,et al. Family history and prostate cancer risk in black, white, and Asian men in the United States and Canada. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.
[42] H. Carter,et al. Mixed-effects regression models for studying the natural history of prostate disease. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.
[43] M. Gail,et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[44] M. Roobol,et al. How Often is Biopsy Necessary in Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance? , 2016, The Journal of urology.
[45] Ming-Hui Chen,et al. Cost implications and complications of overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer in the United States. , 2015, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.
[46] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[47] T. Tammela,et al. Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up , 2014, The Lancet.
[48] B. Tombal,et al. Epidemiology and Prevention of Prostate Cancer , 2013 .
[49] Martyn Plummer,et al. JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .