An image-computable psychophysical spatial vision model.

A large part of classical visual psychophysics was concerned with the fundamental question of how pattern information is initially encoded in the human visual system. From these studies a relatively standard model of early spatial vision emerged, based on spatial frequency and orientation-specific channels followed by an accelerating nonlinearity and divisive normalization: contrast gain-control. Here we implement such a model in an image-computable way, allowing it to take arbitrary luminance images as input. Testing our implementation on classical psychophysical data, we find that it explains contrast detection data including the ModelFest data, contrast discrimination data, and oblique masking data, using a single set of parameters. Leveraging the advantage of an image-computable model, we test our model against a recent dataset using natural images as masks. We find that the model explains these data reasonably well, too. To explain data obtained at different presentation durations, our model requires different parameters to achieve an acceptable fit. In addition, we show that contrast gain-control with the fitted parameters results in a very sparse encoding of luminance information, in line with notions from efficient coding. Translating the standard early spatial vision model to be image-computable resulted in two further insights: First, the nonlinear processing requires a denser sampling of spatial frequency and orientation than optimal coding suggests. Second, the normalization needs to be fairly local in space to fit the data obtained with natural image masks. Finally, our image-computable model can serve as tool in future quantitative analyses: It allows optimized stimuli to be used to test the model and variants of it, with potential applications as an image-quality metric. In addition, it may serve as a building block for models of higher level processing.

[1]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Human luminance pattern-vision mechanisms: masking experiments require a new model. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  M. Morgan,et al.  Facilitation from collinear flanks is cancelled by non-collinear flanks , 2000, Vision Research.

[4]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. , 1987, Science.

[5]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Contrast discrimination with sinusoidal gratings of different spatial frequency. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  David R. Williams,et al.  Off-axis optical quality and retinal sampling in the human eye , 1996, Vision Research.

[7]  D R Badcock,et al.  Discrimination of spatial phase changes: contrast and position codes. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[8]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  M. Philiastides,et al.  Perceptual learning alters post-sensory processing in human decision-making , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[10]  T. Meese,et al.  Grating and plaid masks indicate linear summation in a contrast gain pool. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[11]  D. Levi,et al.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  J. Rovamo,et al.  An estimation and application of the human cortical magnification factor , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Li Zhaoping,et al.  Efficient Coding Theory Predicts a Tilt Aftereffect from Viewing Untilted Patterns , 2016, Current Biology.

[14]  R. Navarro,et al.  Modulation transfer of the human eye as a function of retinal eccentricity. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  Felix A. Wichmann,et al.  Painfree and accurate Bayesian estimation of psychometric functions for (potentially) overdispersed data , 2016, Vision Research.

[16]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Image quality and entropy masking , 1997, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Adaptation mechanisms in spatial vision—i. Bleaches and backgrounds , 1995, Vision Research.

[19]  Jyrki Rovamo,et al.  Modelling the dependence of contrast sensitivity on grating area and spatial frequency , 1993, Vision Research.

[20]  Geoffrey M. Boynton,et al.  New model of human luminance pattern vision mechanisms: analysis of the effects of pattern orientation, spatial phase, and temporal frequency , 1994, Other Conferences.

[21]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Bayesian analysis of identification performance in monkey visual cortex: Nonlinear mechanisms and stimulus certainty , 1995, Vision Research.

[22]  N. Graham,et al.  Detection of grating patterns containing two spatial frequencies: a comparison of single-channel and multiple-channels models. , 1971, Vision research.

[23]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Using goal-driven deep learning models to understand sensory cortex , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  David Williams,et al.  Color and the Cone Mosaic , 2006, Color Imaging Conference.

[25]  G. Wyszecki,et al.  Axial chromatic aberration of the human eye. , 1957, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[26]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[27]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Some experiments bearing on the hypothesis that the visual system analyses spatial patterns in independent bands of spatial frequency , 1975, Vision Research.

[28]  D. Braun,et al.  Phase noise and the classification of natural images , 2006, Vision Research.

[29]  Robbe L. T. Goris,et al.  A neural population model for visual pattern detection. , 2013, Psychological review.

[30]  J. Movshon,et al.  Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[32]  F. Campbell,et al.  Orientational selectivity of the human visual system , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Fixed or variable noise in contrast discrimination? The jury’s still out… , 2006, Vision Research.

[34]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[36]  R. Rosenholtz Capabilities and Limitations of Peripheral Vision. , 2016, Annual review of vision science.

[37]  D. Ringach Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  J L Gallant,et al.  Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. , 2000, Science.

[39]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[40]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  A. Watson,et al.  Patterns of temporal interaction in the detection of gratings , 1977, Vision Research.

[42]  Christopher W Tyler,et al.  Separating the effects of response nonlinearity and internal noise psychophysically , 2002, Vision Research.

[43]  M. Carandini,et al.  Normalization as a canonical neural computation , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[45]  John M. Foley,et al.  Analysis of the effect of pattern adaptation on pattern pedestal effects: A two-process model , 1997, Vision Research.

[46]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Deep neural networks: a new framework for modelling biological vision and brain information processing , 2015, bioRxiv.

[47]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[48]  J. Robson,et al.  Probability summation and regional variation in contrast sensitivity across the visual field , 1981, Vision Research.

[49]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Cardinal rules: Visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[50]  R. Freeman,et al.  Oblique effect: a neural basis in the visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  K. Naka,et al.  S‐potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae) , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[52]  A. Stockman,et al.  A luminous efficiency function, V*(lambda), for daylight adaptation. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[53]  W. Geisler,et al.  Retina-V1 model of detectability across the visual field. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[54]  N. Graham Visual Pattern Analyzers , 1989 .

[55]  A. Pouget,et al.  Not Noisy, Just Wrong: The Role of Suboptimal Inference in Behavioral Variability , 2012, Neuron.

[56]  J. Robson,et al.  Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[57]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Origin and Function of Tuning Diversity in Macaque Visual Cortex , 2015, Neuron.

[58]  Timothy D. Hanks,et al.  Probabilistic Population Codes for Bayesian Decision Making , 2008, Neuron.

[59]  D. Badcock Spatial phase or luminance profile discrimination? , 1984, Vision Research.

[60]  J. Yellott,et al.  A unified formula for light-adapted pupil size. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[61]  A. Watson,et al.  A formula for the mean human optical modulation transfer function as a function of pupil size. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[62]  G. Henning,et al.  The detection of gratings in narrow‐band visual noise * , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[63]  T. Meese,et al.  Adaptation and gain pool summation: alternative models and masking data , 2002, Vision Research.

[64]  C Koch,et al.  Revisiting spatial vision: toward a unifying model. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[65]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Partitioning neuronal variability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[66]  C. Furmanski,et al.  An oblique effect in human primary visual cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[67]  Philip T. Kortum,et al.  Adaptation mechanisms in spatial vision—ii. Flash thresholds and background adaptation , 1995, Vision Research.

[68]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Design and Use of Steerable Filters , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[69]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[70]  F. Mechler,et al.  Detection and Discrimination of Relative Spatial Phase by V1 Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[71]  Ning Qian,et al.  The oblique effect depends on perceived, rather than physical, orientation and direction , 2005, Vision Research.

[72]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Shiftable multiscale transforms , 1992, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[73]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[74]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  Sensitivity to Light , 1986 .

[75]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[76]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[77]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of colour vision , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[78]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Requiem for the max rule? , 2015, Vision Research.

[79]  F. Kingdom Fixed versus variable internal noise in contrast transduction: The significance of Whittle’s data , 2016, Vision Research.

[80]  Keith A May,et al.  Connecting psychophysical performance to neuronal response properties II: Contrast decoding and detection. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[81]  D G Pelli,et al.  Uncertainty explains many aspects of visual contrast detection and discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[82]  T. Meese,et al.  The attenuation surface for contrast sensitivity has the form of a witch's hat within the central visual field. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[83]  W. Charman,et al.  Objective measurements of the longitudinal chromatic aberration of the human eye , 1976, Vision Research.

[84]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Population code in mouse V1 facilitates read-out of natural scenes through increased sparseness , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[85]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Perception of stationary plaids: The role of spatial filters in edge analysis , 1997, Vision Research.

[86]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[87]  J A Solomon,et al.  Model of visual contrast gain control and pattern masking. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[88]  R. Shapley,et al.  Orientation Selectivity in Macaque V1: Diversity and Laminar Dependence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[89]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Maximum differentiation (MAD) competition: a methodology for comparing computational models of perceptual quantities. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[90]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images , 1987 .

[91]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuotopic organization and extent of V3 and V4 of the macaque , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[92]  E T Rolls,et al.  Sparseness of the neuronal representation of stimuli in the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[93]  W. Charman,et al.  Off-axis image quality in the human eye , 1981, Vision Research.

[94]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Matching Coding to Scenes to Enhance Efficiency , 1983 .

[95]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—II. Quadratic summation , 1984, Vision Research.

[96]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—I. Detection and discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[97]  Felix A. Wichmann,et al.  Some Aspects of Modelling Human Spatial Vision: Contrast Discrimination , 1999 .

[98]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[99]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[100]  R. Snowden,et al.  The effects of surround contrast on contrast thresholds, perceived contrast and contrast discrimination , 1998, Vision Research.

[101]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  The angular selectivity of visual cortical cells to moving gratings , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[102]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .

[103]  Kedarnath P Vilankar,et al.  Local masking in natural images: a database and analysis. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[104]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Modelling contrast sensitivity as a function of retinal illuminance and grating area , 1994, Vision Research.

[105]  Valero Laparra,et al.  Perceptual image quality assessment using a normalized Laplacian pyramid , 2016, HVEI.

[106]  D. Hood,et al.  Lower-level visual processing and models of light adaptation. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[107]  M. Morgan,et al.  Crowding and the tilt illusion: toward a unified account. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[108]  H. Wilson,et al.  Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[109]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[110]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[111]  A. Watson,et al.  A standard model for foveal detection of spatial contrast. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[112]  M. Carandini,et al.  Predictions of a recurrent model of orientation selectivity , 1997, Vision Research.

[113]  J. Daugman Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles , 1980, Vision Research.

[114]  Simon Barthelmé,et al.  Spatial statistics and attentional dynamics in scene viewing. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[115]  Valero Laparra,et al.  Perceptually Optimized Image Rendering , 2017, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[116]  D. H. Kelly Motion and vision. II. Stabilized spatio-temporal threshold surface. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[117]  Mark A. Georgeson,et al.  Contrast and lustre: A model that accounts for eleven different forms of contrast discrimination in binocular vision , 2016, Vision Research.

[118]  Damon M. Chandler,et al.  A computational model for predicting local distortion visibility via convolutional neural network trainedon natural scenes , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[119]  D. Heeger,et al.  Center-surround interactions in foveal and peripheral vision , 2000, Vision Research.

[120]  A. Derrington,et al.  Some observations on the masking effects of two-dimensional stimuli , 1989, Vision Research.

[121]  G. Legge,et al.  Contrast discrimination in noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[122]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[123]  K. May,et al.  Connecting psychophysical performance to neuronal response properties I: Discrimination of suprathreshold stimuli. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[124]  J Nachmias,et al.  Letter: Grating contrast: discrimination may be better than detection. , 1974, Vision research.

[125]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[126]  A. Bradley,et al.  Statistical variation of aberration structure and image quality in a normal population of healthy eyes. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[127]  F. Jäkel,et al.  Spatial four-alternative forced-choice method is the preferred psychophysical method for naïve observers. , 2006, Journal of vision.