Interactive multiobjective analysis embedding the decision maker's implicit preference function.

: Two simple interactive techniques are developed and illustrated by means of two different real-life examples in Thailand. The first technique, Evolutionary Sequential Multiobjective Problem Solving (ESEMOPS), is an open-ended algorithm designed for planning problems with discrete alternatives. ESEMOPS helps the decision making group (DMG) develop progressively a preference function over the alternatives. The algorithm follows an evolutionary “breeding” strategy to generate a small set of good alternative solutions. This heuristic search, which does not guarantee that the adopted ‘satisfactum’ is an efficient solution leads to plausible results when applied to the planning of the Mae Khlong-Chao Phraya interbasin water transfer and irrigation system. The second algorithm, Search Beam Method (SBM) is essentially a series of one-dimensional searches for an efficient point along a “beam” passing through a goal point. Repeated search towards displayed goal points is leading to a set of quasi non-dominated solutions. SBM is illustrated by the Ubol Ratana reservoir control problem with the two conflicting objectives of energy generation and irrigation water supply. Neither ESEMOPS nor SBM require that weights, utilities, or pairwise tradeoffs be assessed. These features have been very much appreciated by a real DMG presented with the two techniques.

[1]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Interactive multiobjective programing in water resources: A case study , 1973 .

[2]  J. J. Bogardi,et al.  Application of the search beam method to derive non-dominated release policy for a multipurpose reservoir. , 1989 .

[3]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  MULTICRITERION ANALYSIS OF GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION MANAGEMENT , 1992 .

[4]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  Interactive Water Resources Modeling and Model Use: An Overview , 1985 .

[5]  J. J. Bogardi,et al.  Interactive multiobjective modeling of discrete decisions in water resources planning. , 1992 .

[6]  Simon French,et al.  Multi-Objective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications , 1983 .

[7]  J. J. Bogardi,et al.  Application of the modified fibonacci search-based search beam method to derive a nondominated release policy for a multi-purpose reservoir , 1990 .

[8]  Milan Zelany,et al.  A concept of compromise solutions and the method of the displaced ideal , 1974, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[10]  L. Duckstein,et al.  Multiobjective optimization in river basin development , 1980 .

[11]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[12]  J. J. Bogardi,et al.  Search Beam Method. A promishing way to define non-dominated solutions in multi-objective groundwater development , 1991 .