Redundant meta-analyses are common in genetic epidemiology.

[1]  D. Pachito,et al.  Methodological quality and redundancy of systematic reviews that compare endarterectomy versus stenting for carotid stenosis , 2019, BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.

[2]  G. Giannakoulas,et al.  Overview of Systematic Reviews of Non–Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: Evidence of Publication Overlap , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[3]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Replication, Duplication, and Waste in a Quarter Million Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. , 2018, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[4]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies. , 2017, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  J. McKenzie,et al.  Overviews of systematic reviews: great promise, greater challenge , 2017, Systematic Reviews.

[6]  S. Fukuhara,et al.  Majority of systematic reviews published in high-impact journals neglected to register the protocols: a meta-epidemiological study. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  J. Ioannidis.  Next-generation systematic reviews: prospective meta-analysis, individual-level data, networks and umbrella reviews , 2017, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[8]  F. Song,et al.  The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews from China and the USA are similar. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  David Moher,et al.  Mass Production of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: An Exercise in Mega-silliness? , 2016, The Milbank quarterly.

[10]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. , 2016, The Milbank quarterly.

[11]  S. Ebrahim,et al.  Meta-analyses with industry involvement are massively published and report no caveats for antidepressants. , 2016, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  J. Geddes,et al.  Recent meta-analyses neglect previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses about the same topic: a systematic examination , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[13]  A. Grey,et al.  A Case Study of Discordant Overlapping Meta-Analyses: Vitamin D Supplements and Fracture , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  A. Janssens,et al.  A systematic review and critical assessment of 11 discordant meta-analyses on reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes in clopidogrel users , 2014, Genetics in Medicine.

[15]  D. Moher,et al.  How to reduce unnecessary duplication: use PROSPERO , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  Iain Chalmers,et al.  How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set , 2014, The Lancet.

[17]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis , 2014, The Lancet.

[18]  Harlan Krumholz,et al.  The case for duplication of meta-analyses and systematic reviews , 2013, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  D. Moher.  The problem of duplicate systematic reviews , 2013, BMJ.

[20]  Tina Hernandez-Boussard,et al.  Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies , 2013, BMJ.

[21]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The Geometric Increase in Meta-Analyses from China in the Genomic Era , 2013, PloS one.

[22]  G. Sanders,et al.  Identifying Research Needs for Improving Health Care , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  Peter Tugwell,et al.  Updating systematic reviews--when and how? , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The False-positive to False-negative Ratio in Epidemiologic Studies , 2011, Epidemiology.

[25]  David Moher,et al.  An international registry of systematic-review protocols , 2011, The Lancet.

[26]  Muin J. Khoury,et al.  Phenopedia and Genopedia: disease-centered and gene-centered views of the evolving knowledge of human genetic associations , 2009, Bioinform..

[27]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  When and how to update systematic reviews. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[28]  D. Cook,et al.  A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. , 1997, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[29]  F. Davidoff,et al.  Evidence based medicine , 1995, Lancet.