Multi-day training with vibrotactile feedback for virtual object manipulation

Optimal function of prosthetic hands for activities of daily living requires knowledge of contact force; however, users of prosthetic hands must rely on visual feedback for object manipulation, requiring constant concentration. Vibrotactile stimulation was explored as a modality for force feedback over multiple testing sessions. Unimpaired participants (N=6) performed virtual object manipulation with their right index finger using both visual feedback and vibrotactile feedback corresponding to the applied force on the virtual object on four days over a 4–8 day period. Object manipulation outcome measures were user difficulty ratings, object displacement, and object average velocity. Participants were able to utilize the vibrotactile feedback to statistically significantly improve performance of all three outcome measures over the four days. Significant improvements in all outcome measures were seen between days 3 and 4, indicating that steady state performance may not have been reached. Results support the use of augmentative vibrotactile feedback for users of prosthetic hands, though future longer longitudinal study will be necessary to determine steady state performance.

[1]  M. Ptito,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity revealed by electrotactile stimulation of the tongue in the congenitally blind. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  A. Kargov,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Force Feedback System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands , 2006 .

[3]  D. Datta,et al.  Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency–acquired and congenital , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[4]  Rick Kazman,et al.  Vibrotactile feedback in delicate virtual reality operations , 1997, MULTIMEDIA '96.

[5]  Nitish V. Thakor,et al.  Testing a Prosthetic Haptic Feedback Simulator With an Interactive Force Matching Task , 2008 .

[6]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  R. T. Verrillo,et al.  Vibration Sensation in Humans , 1992 .

[8]  Maria Chiara Carrozza,et al.  Biomechatronic Design and Control of an Anthropomorphic Artificial Hand for Prosthetic and Robotic Applications , 2007 .

[9]  H. Schmidt The importance of information feedback in prostheses for the upper limbs1 , 1977 .

[10]  H. Schmidl The importance of information feedback in prostheses for the upper limbs. , 1977, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[11]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Control of a six degree of freedom prosthetic arm after targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  G. Shannon,et al.  Training program for a myo-electrically controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback system. , 1981, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[13]  W. Kirchner Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  C. Pylatiuk,et al.  Results of an Internet survey of myoelectric prosthetic hand users , 2007, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[15]  S. Roccella,et al.  BioMechatronic Design and Control of an Anthropomorphic Artificial Hand for Prosthetics and Robotic Applications , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[16]  R. T. Verrillo Subjective Magnitude Functions for Vibrotaction , 1970 .

[17]  Elaine Biddiss,et al.  Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.