THE CLINICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF ESTROGEN RECEPTOR-LOW POSITIVE BREAST CANCER.
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Green | E. Rakha | N. Mongan | M. Toss | Maryam Althobiti | Andrew H. S. Lee | A. Muftah | Shorouk Makhlouf | A. Green | S. Makhlouf | Abir A. Muftah
[1] M. Paulli,et al. Concordance of immunohistochemistry for predictive and prognostic factors in breast cancer between biopsy and surgical excision: a single-centre experience and review of the literature , 2023, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[2] Ali M. Al-Mashat,et al. Concordance between core needle biopsy and surgical excision for breast cancer tumor grade and biomarkers , 2022, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[3] Keda Yu,et al. De‐escalation of five‐year adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with estrogen receptor‐low positive (immunohistochemistry staining 1%‐10%) breast cancer: Propensity‐matched analysis from a prospectively maintained cohort , 2022, Cancer.
[4] T. Foukakis,et al. The prognostic and predictive impact of low estrogen receptor expression in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, ESMO open.
[5] E. Rakha,et al. Assessment of proliferation in breast cancer: cell cycle or mitosis? An observational study , 2021, Histopathology.
[6] M. Barberis,et al. Breast Cancer Heterogeneity , 2021, Diagnostics.
[7] W. Weichert,et al. Outcome of breast cancer patients with low hormone receptor positivity: Analysis of a 15-year population-based cohort. , 2021, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[8] M. Dieci,et al. Impact of estrogen receptor levels on outcome in non-metastatic triple negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy , 2021, NPJ breast cancer.
[9] Keda Yu,et al. Estrogen receptor‐low breast cancer: Biology chaos and treatment paradox , 2021, Cancer communications.
[10] V. Karantza,et al. Prevalence, treatment patterns, and prognosis of low estrogen receptor-positive (1% to 10%) breast cancer: a single institution’s experience in Korea , 2021, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[11] M. Rezai,et al. Therapy response and prognosis of patients with early breast cancer with low positivity for hormone receptors - An analysis of 2765 patients from neoadjuvant clinical trials. , 2021, European journal of cancer.
[12] G. Siegal,et al. Characterization of estrogen receptor-low-positive breast cancer , 2021, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[13] O. Stoetzer,et al. Concordance of the molecular subtype classification between core needle biopsy and surgical specimen in primary breast cancer , 2021, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
[14] H. Wildiers,et al. Computerised scoring protocol for identification and quantification of different immune cell populations in breast tumour regions by the use of QuPath software , 2020, Histopathology.
[15] D. Rimm,et al. Association between low estrogen receptor positive breast cancer and staining performance , 2020, npj Breast Cancer.
[16] C. Perou,et al. Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Testing in Breast Cancer: ASCO/CAP Guideline Update. , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[17] Hongjian Yang,et al. Prognosis and endocrine therapy selection for patients with low hormone receptor-positive breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A retrospective study of 570 patients in China , 2019, Oncology letters.
[18] S. Bettelli,et al. Surrogate Molecular Classification of Invasive Breast Carcinoma: A Comparison Between Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Excision, With and Without Neoadjuvant Therapy , 2019, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology (Print).
[19] S. Robertson,et al. Re-testing of predictive biomarkers on surgical breast cancer specimens is clinically relevant , 2019, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[20] S. Noguchi,et al. PAM50 for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ER-positive breast cancer , 2018, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[21] D. Dabbs,et al. Breast cancer global tumor biomarkers: a quality assurance study of intratumoral heterogeneity , 2018, Modern Pathology.
[22] M. Dowsett,et al. Breast cancer biomarkers in clinical testing: analysis of a UK national external quality assessment scheme for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridisation database containing results from 199 300 patients , 2018, The journal of pathology. Clinical research.
[23] E. Fukuma,et al. Oestrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive phenotype of invasive breast carcinoma in Japan: re-evaluated using immunohistochemical staining , 2018, Breast Cancer.
[24] D. Dabbs,et al. Low Estrogen Receptor (ER)–Positive Breast Cancer and Neoadjuvant Systemic Chemotherapy: Is Response Similar to Typical ER-Positive or ER-Negative Disease? , 2018, American journal of clinical pathology.
[25] L. Pusztai,et al. Revisiting the definition of estrogen receptor positivity in HER2-negative primary breast cancer , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[26] M. Troxell,et al. Comparison of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Antibody Reagents Using Proficiency Testing Data. , 2017, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[27] Ning Zhang,et al. Borderline ER‐Positive Primary Breast Cancer Gains No Significant Survival Benefit From Endocrine Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis , 2017, Clinical breast cancer.
[28] C. Blanchette,et al. Prognostic and predictive value of low estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer. , 2017, Current oncology.
[29] Peter Bankhead,et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis , 2017, Scientific Reports.
[30] Xiao-Jun Ma,et al. Ribonucleic Acid In Situ Hybridization Is a More Sensitive Method Than Immunohistochemistry in Detection of Thyroid Transcription Factor 1 and Napsin A Expression in Lung Adenocarcinomas. , 2016, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[31] P. Bult,et al. Quality assessment of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor testing in breast cancer using a tissue microarray-based approach , 2015, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.
[32] David G. Hicks,et al. Pathological features and clinical outcomes of breast cancer according to levels of oestrogen receptor expression , 2014, Histopathology.
[33] A. Luini,et al. Survival outcomes in breast cancer patients with low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression. , 2014, Clinical breast cancer.
[34] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Which threshold for ER positivity? a retrospective study based on 9639 patients. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[35] D. Dabbs,et al. Low ER+ breast cancer: Is this a distinct group? , 2014, American journal of clinical pathology.
[36] N. Dendukuri,et al. A Majority of Low (1-10%) ER Positive Breast Cancers Behave Like Hormone Receptor Negative Tumors , 2014, Journal of Cancer.
[37] A. Richardson,et al. Interobserver concordance in implementing the 2010 ASCO/CAP recommendations for reporting ER in breast carcinomas: a demonstration of the difficulties of consistently reporting low levels of ER expression by manual quantification. , 2013, American journal of clinical pathology.
[38] Jianhua Wang,et al. Preoperative core needle biopsy is accurate in determining molecular subtypes in invasive breast cancer , 2013, BMC Cancer.
[39] I. Ellis,et al. Low-estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: the impact of tissue sampling, choice of antibody, and molecular subtyping. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[40] G. Hortobagyi,et al. Impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression on survival outcomes in breast cancers previously classified as triple negative breast cancers , 2012, Cancer.
[41] Yuan Qi,et al. Estrogen receptor (ER) mRNA and ER-related gene expression in breast cancers that are 1% to 10% ER-positive by immunohistochemistry. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[42] R Peto,et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials , 2011, The Lancet.
[43] M. Tiemann,et al. Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: Fakes and facts , 2011 .
[44] I. Ellis,et al. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Distinguishing between Basal and Nonbasal Subtypes , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.
[45] Ian O Ellis,et al. Prognostic significance of Nottingham histologic grade in invasive breast carcinoma. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[46] Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method , 2008, Nature Protocols.
[47] Ian O Ellis,et al. Biologic and clinical characteristics of breast cancer with single hormone receptor positive phenotype. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[48] P. Neven,et al. Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1-98. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[49] I. Ellis,et al. The reliability of assessment of oestrogen receptor expression on needle core biopsy specimens of invasive carcinomas of the breast , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.
[50] Anthony Rhodes,et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[51] S. Pinder,et al. E‐cadherin expression in invasive non‐lobular carcinoma of the breast and its prognostic significance , 2005, Histopathology.
[52] K. Hasui,et al. A new simplified catalyzed signal amplification system for minimizing non-specific staining in tissues with supersensitive immunohistochemistry. , 2005, Archives of histology and cytology.
[53] A. Luini,et al. Chemotherapy Is More Effective in Patients with Breast Cancer Not Expressing Steroid Hormone Receptors , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.
[54] C K Osborne,et al. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[55] D. Allred,et al. Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. , 1998, Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc.
[56] P. Neven,et al. A critical review why assessment of steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer should be quantitative. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
[57] J. Flanagan,et al. RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. , 2012, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.
[58] Craig D. Shriver,et al. Effect of ASCO/CAP Guidelines for Determining ER Status on Molecular Subtype , 2012, Annals of Surgical Oncology.
[59] Anthony Rhodes,et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer (unabridged version). , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[60] C. Gomez-Fernandez,et al. Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5,993 breast cancers. , 2005, American journal of clinical pathology.
[61] K. Hirakawa,et al. Immunohistochemical assessment for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer: Analysis for a cut-off point as the predictor for endocrine therapy , 2004, Breast cancer.