Variance-preserving mosaicing of multiple satellite images for forest parameter estimation: Radiometric normalization

Abstract Measuring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) systems of the United Nations programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+) aim to provide robust and reliable data on carbon credits over large areas. Multitemporal satellite mosaics are often the only cost-effective remote sensing data that allow such coverage. Although a number of methods for producing mosaics has been proposed, most of them are dependent on the order in which tiles to normalized are presented to the algorithm and suffer from loss of input scenes’ variance which can substantially reduce the carbon credits. In this study we propose a variance-preserving mosaic (VPM) algorithm that considers all images at the same time, minimizes overall error of the normalization and aims to preserve average variance of input images. We have compared the presented method with a popular relative normalization algorithm commonly used nowadays. The proposed algorithm allows to avoid iterative pair-wise normalization, results in visually uniform mosaics while maintaining also the original image variance.

[1]  Mingsheng Liao,et al.  Automatic relative radiometric normalization using iteratively weighted least square regression , 2008 .

[2]  P. Teillet,et al.  On the Slope-Aspect Correction of Multispectral Scanner Data , 1982 .

[3]  Timo Tokola,et al.  Relative radiometric correction of multi-temporal ALOS AVNIR-2 data for the estimation of forest attributes , 2012 .

[4]  A. Angelsen Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications , 2008 .

[5]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality , 2007 .

[6]  Fernando Pérez-Cabello,et al.  Assessment of radiometric correction techniques in analyzing vegetation variability and change using time series of Landsat images , 2008 .

[7]  S. L Furby,et al.  Calibrating images from different dates to ‘like-value’ digital counts , 2001 .

[8]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? , 2001 .

[9]  Conghe Song,et al.  Radiometric correction of multi-temporal Landsat data for characterization of early successional forest patterns in western Oregon , 2006 .

[10]  Ching-Weei Lin,et al.  Automatic radiometric normalization with genetic algorithms and a Kriging model , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[11]  Christopher D. Elvidge,et al.  Comparison of relative radiometric normalization techniques , 1996 .

[12]  Rasim Latifovic,et al.  Landsat-7 ETM+ radiometric normalization comparison for northern mapping applications , 2005 .

[13]  J. Cihlar,et al.  Radiometric normalization of multitemporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection , 2002 .

[14]  Yong Du,et al.  Radiometric normalization, compositing, and quality control for satellite high resolution image mosaics over large areas , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Automated morphological image composition for mosaicing large image data sets , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[16]  S. Goetz,et al.  Radiometric rectification - Toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images , 1991 .