Projective Invariance and Picture Perception

Four experiments test the assumption that, in the visual perception of pictures, observers have reliable and direct access to the equivalence of shapes in projective geometry. The assumption is that perception of projective equivalence is the basis of shape constancy (‘the projective thesis’). Observers matched or reproduced abstract planar shapes under conditions of rotation in the picture plane, and pictured rotation in depth. Departure from projective equivalence was assessed in each study by measuring the planar analogue of cross ratio. Projective equivalence was not found to be perceived uniformly where Euclidean equivalence was not judged uniformly, either in recognition tasks or in production tasks. When the projective thesis is put to a suitably general test, confidence in the thesis is undermined.

[1]  K. Niall,et al.  Projective invariance and visual shape constancy. , 1989, Acta psychologica.

[2]  T O Halloran,et al.  Picture perception is array-specific: Viewing angle versus apparent orientation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  I. Rock,et al.  Can we imagine how objects look from other viewpoints? , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Y. Takano Perception of rotated forms: A theory of information types , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  I Rock,et al.  Size Constancy in Children: A New Interpretation , 1988, Perception.

[6]  K. Niall Perspectives yet unseen , 1987 .

[7]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Minimum points and views for the recovery of three-dimensional structure. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Stanley M. Dunn,et al.  Texture discrimination by projective invariants , 1987, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[9]  A. Remole PERCEPTION WITH AN EYE FOR MOTION , 1987 .

[10]  Eric Térouanne,et al.  “Impossible figures” and interpretations of polyhedral figures , 1983 .

[11]  K. A. Stevens Surface tilt (the direction of slant): A neglected psychophysical variable , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  R. Torretti Philosophy of geometry from Riemann to Poincaré , 1981 .

[13]  J. Fodor,et al.  How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson's “ecological approach” , 1981, Cognition.

[14]  H. C. Reggini,et al.  Perspectives in Open Spaces: A Geometrical Application of the Thouless Index , 1978, Perception.

[15]  R. Shepard,et al.  Perceptual illusion of rotation of three-dimensional objects. , 1976, Science.

[16]  I. Rock,et al.  An introduction to perception , 1975 .

[17]  G. Johansson,et al.  Visual Perception of Bending Motion , 1973, Perception.

[18]  D. Perkins Visual discrimination between rectangular and nonrectangular parallelopipeds , 1972 .

[19]  F. Attneave,et al.  The determination of perceived tridimensional orientation by minimum criteria , 1969 .

[20]  G. Johansson PERCEPTION OF MOTION AND CHANGING FORM: A study of visual perception from continuous transformations of a solid angle of light at the eye , 1964 .

[21]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[22]  J. Gibson,et al.  The relation of apparent shape to apparent slant in the perception of objects. , 1955, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  A. S. Gilinsky,et al.  The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[24]  E. Boring,et al.  Visual perception as invariance. , 1952, Psychological review.

[25]  J. Gibson Book Reviews: The Perception of the Visual World , 1950 .

[26]  W. Peddie Phenomenal Regression to the Real Object , 1933, Nature.

[27]  W. Simpson The cross-ratio and the perception of motion and structure (abstract only) , 1984, COMG.

[28]  Z. Pylyshyn The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. , 1981 .

[29]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[30]  S. Lie Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie , 1967 .

[31]  N. Suga Perceptual Illusion of Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 2022 .