Regional differences in quality of care and outcomes for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the get with the guidelines coronary artery disease program.

BACKGROUND Geographic differences in the delivery of guideline-driven care following acute myocardial infarction have been described. The effect of hospital participation in a national performance improvement program on regional variation in quality of care and in-hospital outcomes for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is unknown. METHODS We evaluated the variation in conformity to the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease Program quality measures across 4 geographic regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and East) in 161,236 patients admitted for ACS to 436 Get With The Guidelines hospitals. We evaluated 6 measures (aspirin within 24 hours, aspirin at discharge, ACEI or ARB therapy for left ventricular systolic dysfunction, beta-blocker at discharge, lipid-lowering medication for qualified patients, smoking cessation advice); a binary "all-or-none" process performance measure (primary outcome); an "opportunity-based" overall composite score (secondary outcome); in-hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to test the associations between performance measures and short-term outcomes and geographic region. RESULTS Data were collected from January 2, 2000 to January 2, 2008. There was no significant regional variation in either the "all-or-none" (Northeast: 79.3%; Midwest: 83.2%; South: 78.9%; West: 81.6%) or "opportunity-based" (Northeast: 91.9%; Midwest: 93.6%; South: 91.5%; West: 92.6%) composite performance measures. Both performance measures exhibited significant improvement with participation time irrespective of region. In-hospital mortality was similar among regions. Adjusted hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the Midwest. CONCLUSION Quality improvement program participation may help to facilitate high quality, consistent care for patients with ACS.

[1]  C. Cannon,et al.  An organized approach to improvement in guideline adherence for acute myocardial infarction: results with the Get With The Guidelines quality improvement program. , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[2]  Sidney C. Smith,et al.  Improved treatment of hospitalized coronary artery disease patients with the get with the guidelines program. , 2007, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[3]  Robert Parrish,et al.  Guideline-based standardized care is associated with substantially lower mortality in medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Projects in Michigan. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  A. Jha,et al.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Hospital-Level Performance Improvement: Beta-Blocker Use After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2004, Medical care.

[6]  A. Gawlinski,et al.  Improved treatment of coronary heart disease by implementation of a Cardiac Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program (CHAMP). , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  B. B. Fleming,et al.  Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at state and national levels. , 2000, JAMA.

[8]  R. Centor,et al.  Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI. , 2000, JAMA.

[9]  D. Einstadter,et al.  The association between hospital type and mortality and length of stay: a study of 16.9 million hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries. , 2000, Medical care.

[10]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Geographic variation in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 1999, JAMA.

[11]  H. Krumholz,et al.  Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. , 1998, JAMA.

[12]  W. O’Neill,et al.  Regional variation across the United States in the management of acute myocardial infarction. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  L Pilote,et al.  Regional variation across the United States in the management of acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-1 Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.