Biologically relevant exposure science for 21st century toxicity testing.

High visibility efforts in toxicity testing and computational toxicology including the recent National Research Council of the National Academies (NRC) report, Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and Strategy (NRC, 2007a), raise important research questions and opportunities for the field of exposure science. The authors of the National Academies report (NRC, 2007a) emphasize that population-based data and human exposure information are required at each step of their vision for toxicity testing and that these data will continue to play a critical role in both guiding development and use of the toxicity information. In fact, state-of-the-art exposure science is essential for translation of toxicity data to assess potential for risk to individuals and populations and to inform public health decisions. As we move forward to implement the NRC vision, a transformational change in exposure science is required. Application of a fresh perspective and novel techniques to capture critical determinants at biologically motivated resolution for translation from controlled in vitro systems to the open multifactorial system of real-world human-environment interaction will be critical. Development of an exposure ontology and knowledge base will facilitate extension of network analysis to the individual and population for translating toxicity information and assessing health risk. Such a sea change in exposure science is required to incorporate consideration of lifestage, genetic susceptibility, and interaction of nonchemical stressors for holistic assessment of risk factors associated with complex environmental disease. A new generation of scientific tools has emerged to rapidly measure signals from cells, tissues, and organisms following exposure to chemicals. Investment in 21st century exposure science is now required to fully realize the potential of the NRC vision for toxicity testing.

[1]  D. Dix,et al.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[2]  Stephen W. Edwards,et al.  Systems biology and mode of action based risk assessment. , 2008, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[3]  Silvana Andreescu,et al.  JEM Spotlight: Applications of advanced nanomaterials for environmental monitoring. , 2009, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[4]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  Genes, Environment, Health, and Disease: Facing up to Complexity , 2007, Human Heredity.

[5]  Steven K. Gibb Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. , 2008, Reproductive toxicology.

[6]  Simon Watkins,et al.  Personalized Exposure Assessment: Promising Approaches for Human Environmental Health Research , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[7]  Sanchita Bhattacharya,et al.  Activation of Inflammation/NF-κB Signaling in Infants Born to Arsenic-Exposed Mothers , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[8]  Elaine A. Cohen Hubal,et al.  Exposure as Part of a Systems Approach for Assessing Risk , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Exposure science and the U.S. EPA National Center for Computational Toxicology , 2010, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[10]  Ann M Richard,et al.  Chemical structure indexing of toxicity data on the internet: moving toward a flat world. , 2006, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[11]  Ann Richard,et al.  ACToR--Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource. , 2008, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[12]  Stephen W. Edwards,et al.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals in fish: developing exposure indicators and predictive models of effects based on mechanism of action. , 2009, Aquatic toxicology.

[13]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  The case for a US prospective cohort study of genes and environment , 2004, Nature.

[14]  J. Bailar,et al.  Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[15]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  Environmental Biology and Human Disease , 2007, Science.

[16]  F. Collins,et al.  Transforming Environmental Health Protection , 2008, Science.

[17]  Chihae Yang,et al.  Toxicity Data Informatics: Supporting a New Paradigm for Toxicity Prediction , 2008, Toxicology mechanisms and methods.

[18]  G. Gibson The environmental contribution to gene expression profiles , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  Thomas C. Wiegers,et al.  The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database facilitates identification and understanding of chemical-gene-disease associations: arsenic as a case study , 2008, BMC Medical Genomics.

[20]  D J Paustenbach,et al.  THE PRACTICE OF EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT: A STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW , 2000, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[21]  David M DeMarini,et al.  Transcriptional responses to complex mixtures: a review. , 2007, Mutation research.

[22]  Guodong Liu,et al.  Nanotechnology-based electrochemical sensors for biomonitoring chemical exposures , 2009, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[23]  Asta Försti,et al.  Opinion: The balance between heritable and environmental aetiology of human disease , 2006, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  C. Wild,et al.  Environmental exposure measurement in cancer epidemiology. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[25]  Jacqueline Moya,et al.  A lifestage approach to assessing children's exposure. , 2008, Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology.

[26]  J. Groopman,et al.  The light at the end of the tunnel for chemical-specific biomarkers: daylight or headlight? , 1999, Carcinogenesis.

[27]  M. McCarthy,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  Danielle G. Lemay,et al.  A multi‐ontology framework to guide agriculture and food towards diet and health , 2007 .

[29]  C. Wild Complementing the Genome with an “Exposome”: The Outstanding Challenge of Environmental Exposure Measurement in Molecular Epidemiology , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[30]  Allan Peter Davis,et al.  Genetic and environmental pathways to complex diseases , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.