Innovation corps for learning (I-Corps™ L): Assessing the potential for sustainable scalability of educational innovations

The Innovation Corps for Learning (I-CorpsTM L) is an initiative of the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) in cooperation with the University of Minnesota, Arizona State University, Colorado State University, and Tufts University to apply the highly successful principles of NSF I-CorpsTM towards a culture that will sustain and scale educational innovations. The NSF I-CorpsTM program, on which I-CorpsTM L is based, uses established strategies for start-ups to build entrepreneurial skills in the engineering and scientific communities that encourage mainstream application of emerging technologies. The overriding purposes of the 8 week I-CorpsTM L course are to (1) provide a framework for each of the participating teams (typically 20 to 24 in a cohort) to assess the potential of their educational innovation for sustainability and scalability, and (2) foster an entrepreneurial mindset within the education community so that education products, programs, and services are designed and implemented in ways that promote widespread adoption. In this paper and poster we summarize the essential features of I-CorpsTM L, the changes made in the three iterations of the program thus far, and key evaluation results. We also present our assessment of the potential of the I-CorpsTM L to contribute to the transformation of STEM education through the sustaining and scaling of NSF-funded research-based ideas.

[1]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  The Complexities of Transforming Engineering Higher Education: Preparing for Next Steps , 2014 .

[2]  Karl A. Smith,et al.  Guest editorial: Continuing to build engineering education research capabilities , 2006, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[3]  Steve Blank.  Why the Lean Start-Up Changes Everything , 2013 .

[4]  K. Smith,et al.  9: Moving From the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning to Educational Research: An Example From Engineering , 2007 .

[5]  Adrianna Kezar,et al.  Communities of Transformation and Their Work Scaling STEM Reform. , 2015 .

[6]  Sarah A. Rajala,et al.  Retention of Undergraduate Engineering Students: Extending Research Into Practice , 2010 .

[7]  K. Smith,et al.  Conducting Rigorous Research in Engineering Education , 2006 .

[8]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[9]  Amy M. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating Virtual Communities of Practice for Faculty Development. , 2016 .

[10]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers , 2010 .

[11]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  The Emergence of a Community of Practice in Engineering Education. , 2006 .

[12]  Dan MacIsaac,et al.  Rising Above the Gathering Storm Revisited released by National Academy of Science , 2011 .

[13]  E. Wenger,et al.  cultivating communities of practice , 2002 .

[14]  Ronald L. Miller,et al.  Enhancing Engineering Education Research Capacity Through Building A Community Of Practice , 2005 .

[15]  Ruth A. Streveler,et al.  CLEERhub.org: Creating a digital habitat for engineering education researchers , 2010 .

[16]  E. Boyer.  Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[17]  Gillian Pritchett.  Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want , 2014 .

[18]  Rocio C. Chavela Guerra,et al.  Innovation corps for learning: Evidence-based entrepreneurship™ to improve (STEM) education , 2014, 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings.

[19]  Bob Dorf,et al.  The step-by-step guide for building a great company , 2012 .

[20]  Rocio C. Chavela Guerra,et al.  Faculty development using virtual communities of practice , 2013 .