A Taxonomy of Student Engagement with Educational Software: An Exploration of Literate Thinking with Electronic Text

Readers of the information age increasingly resort to “texts” that are stored, organized, and accessed electronically and rely on symbol systems other than alphanumeric. In schools, multimedia software and hypertexts are increasingly common documents from which students learn. This study sought to document instances of “high” literacy, literate thinking, among elementary school students as they worked with common computer software in the course of their normal school day. Seven distinct forms of engagement emerged to categorize students' work, and these were arranged in order of complexity: disengagement, unsystematic engagement, frustrated engagement, structure-dependent engagement, self-regulated interest, critical engagement, and literate thinking. The taxonomy of student engagement is described with examples. It clarifies other researchers' conceptualizations of high literacy and engagement and integrates them with notions of intrinsic motivation, volition, and self-regulated learning. It also implies new ways for teachers to assess and scaffold student-software interactions to optimize student learning with electronic texts.

[1]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム（マルス）における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[2]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[3]  Lyn Corno.  The Best-Laid Plans , 1993 .

[4]  Tom Carey,et al.  Engagement as a Design Concept for Multimedia , 1995 .

[5]  G. Hancock,et al.  Does Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction Increase Strategy Use and Conceptual Learning From Text? , 1998 .

[6]  E. Mandinach,et al.  Cognitive engagement variations among students of different ability level and sex in a computer problem solving game , 1985 .

[7]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[8]  E. Mandinach,et al.  The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation , 1983 .

[9]  M. Nystrand,et al.  Instructional Discourse, Student Engagement, and Literature Achievement , 1991, Research in the Teaching of English.

[10]  EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT HISTORY AND INSTRUCTIONS ON THE PERSISTENCE OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT , 1997 .

[11]  Continuing the Conversation: A Clarification , 1995 .

[12]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  An Attainable Version of High Literacy: Approaches to Teaching Higher-Order Skills in Reading and Writing , 1987 .

[13]  David D. Kumar.  A Meta‐analysis of the Relationship between Science Instruction and Student Engagement , 1991 .

[14]  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,et al.  Intrinsic Rewards and Emergent Motivation , 1978 .

[15]  G. Salomon,et al.  Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer , 1987 .

[16]  Mary Ainley,et al.  Styles of engagement with learning: multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement , 1993 .

[17]  Peggy Noel Van Meter,et al.  Growth of Literacy Engagement: Changes in Motivations and Strategies During Concept‐Oriented Reading Instruction , 1996 .

[18]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Educational Contexts for Engagement in Literacy. , 1996 .

[19]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Task Engagement and Conceptual Change in Middle School Science Classrooms , 1993 .

[20]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Inherent details in self-regulated learning , 1995 .

[21]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer-Supported Intentional Learning Environments , 1989 .

[22]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change , 1993 .

[23]  Robert H. Ennis.  A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilitities , 1987 .

[24]  J H JOHNSON,et al.  THE GALLUP POLL. , 1965, Oral health.

[25]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Investigation Center for the Study of Reading Center for the Study of Reading Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Invest , 2007 .

[26]  M. Boekaerts.  SELF-REGULATED LEARNING: A NEW CONCEPT EMBRACED BY RESEARCHERS, POLICY MAKERS, EDUCATORS, TEACHERS, AND STUDENTS , 1997 .

[27]  Judith A. Langer.  Envisioning Literature: Literary Understanding and Literature Instruction , 1995 .

[28]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .