Tomato nitrogen accumulation and fertilizer use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling

Tomato production systems in Florida are typically intensively managed with high inputs of fertilizer and irrigation and on sandy soils with low inherent water and nutrient retention capacities; potential nutrient leaching losses undermine the sustainability of such systems. The objectives of this 3-year field study were to evaluate the interaction between N-fertilizer rates and irrigation scheduling on crop N and P accumulation, N-fertilizer use efficiency (NUE) and NO3-N leaching of tomato cultivated in a plastic mulched/drip irrigated production system in sandy soils. Experimental treatments were a factorial combination of three irrigation scheduling regimes and three N-rates (176, 220, and 330kgha-1). Irrigation treatments included were: (1) surface drip irrigation (SUR) both the irrigation and fertigation line placed underneath the plastic mulch; (2) subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) where the irrigation drip was placed 0.15m below the fertigation line which was located on top of the bed; and (3) TIME (conventional control) with the irrigation and fertigation lines placed as in SUR and irrigation applied once a day. Except for the TIME treatment all irrigation treatments were soil moisture sensor (SMS)-based with irrigation occurring at 10% volumetric water content. Five irrigation windows were scheduled daily and events were bypassed if the soil water content exceeded the established threshold. The use of SMS-based irrigation systems significantly reduced irrigation water use, volume percolated, and nitrate leaching. Based on soil electrical conductivity (EC) readings, there was no interaction between irrigation and N-rate treatments on the movement of fertilizer solutes. Total plant N accumulation for SUR and SDI was 12-37% higher than TIME. Plant P accumulation was not affected by either irrigation or N-rate treatments. The nitrogen use efficiency for SUR and SDI was on the order of 37-45%, 56-61%, and 61-68% for 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively and significantly higher than for the conventional control system (TIME). Moreover, at the intermediate N-rate SUR and SDI systems reduced NO3-N leaching to 5 and 35kgha-1, while at the highest N-rate corresponding values were 7 and 56kgNha-1. Use of N application rates above 220kgha-1 did not result in fruit and/or shoot biomass nor N accumulation benefits, but substantially increased NO3-N leaching for the control treatment, as detected by EC monitoring and by the lysimeters. It is concluded that appropriate use of SDI and/or sensor-based irrigation systems can sustain high yields while reducing irrigation application as well as reducing NO3-N leaching in low water holding capacity soils.

[1]  W. J. Glib,et al.  Soil Survey of Marion County , 1916 .

[2]  S. Irmak,et al.  Performance of Frequency-Domain Reflectometer, Capacitance, and Psuedo-Transit Time-Based Soil Water Content Probes in Four Coarse-Textured Soils , 2005 .

[3]  James W. Jones,et al.  Growth and canopy characteristics of field-grown tomato. , 2000 .

[4]  R. Muñoz‐Carpena,et al.  TDR estimation of electrical conductivity and saline solute concentration in a volcanic soil , 2005 .

[5]  Dani Or,et al.  Root zone solute dynamics under drip irrigation: A review , 2000, Plant and Soil.

[6]  J. Jones,et al.  Sampling, Handling, and Analyzing Plant Tissue Samples , 2018, SSSA Book Series.

[7]  Jiusheng Li,et al.  Water and nitrogen distribution as affected by fertigation of ammonium nitrate from a point source , 2003, Irrigation Science.

[8]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Nitrogen and water use efficiency of zucchini squash for a plastic mulch bed system on a sandy soil , 2008 .

[9]  N. K. Srinivasa Rao,et al.  Effets of two temperature regimes on photosynthesis and growth in two cultivars of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) , 1992 .

[10]  Paolo Benincasa,et al.  Critical nitrogen concentration in processing tomato , 2002 .

[11]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Soil-Water-Solute-Process Characterization , 2006 .

[12]  David D. Bosch,et al.  Field Methods for Monitoring Soil Water Status , 2005 .

[13]  J. Ayars,et al.  Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: a review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Research Laboratory , 1999 .

[14]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Sensor-Based Automation of Irrigation on Bermudagrass during Dry Weather Conditions , 2008 .

[15]  T. Hartz,et al.  DRIS Evaluation of the Nutritional Status of Processing Tomato , 1998 .

[16]  Estimation of Soil Solution Electrical Conductivity from Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity in Sandy Soils , 2000 .

[17]  H. Marschner Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants , 1988 .

[18]  J. G. Futral,et al.  An Aluminum Block Digester for Plant and Soil Analysis , 1975 .

[19]  D. Huett,et al.  Effect of nitrogen on growth, fruit quality and nutrient uptake of tomatoes grown in sand culture , 1988 .

[20]  F. Lecompte,et al.  Root and nitrate distribution as related to the critical plant N status of a fertigated tomato crop , 2008 .

[21]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling , 2009 .

[22]  D. H. Willits,et al.  Response of ovule development and post-pollen production processes in male-sterile tomatoes to chronic, sub-acute high temperature stress , 1997 .

[23]  Clinton C. Shock,et al.  Automation of Subsurface Drip Irrigation for Crop Research , 2002 .

[24]  George J. Hochmuth,et al.  Efficiency Ranges for Nitrate-Nitrogen and Potassium for Vegetable Petiole Sap Quick Tests , 1994 .

[25]  A. G. Smajstrla,et al.  Tensiometer-controlled, drip-irrigation scheduling of tomato , 1996 .

[26]  A. Bloom,et al.  Root Development and Absorption of Ammonium and Nitrate from the Rhizosphere , 2002, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation.

[27]  T. A. Wheaton,et al.  Soil temperature, nitrogen concentration, and residence time affect nitrogen uptake efficiency in citrus. , 2002, Journal of environmental quality.

[28]  B. Bar-yosef,et al.  Distribution of Water and Ions in Soils Irrigated and Fertilized from a Trickle Source 1 , 1976 .

[29]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  DESIGN AND FIELD EVALUATION OF A NEW CONTROLLER FOR SOIL-WATER BASED IRRIGATION , 2008 .

[30]  S. Jansson,et al.  Mineralization and Immobilization of Soil Nitrogen , 1982 .

[31]  F. J. Stevenson Nitrogen in agricultural soils , 1982 .

[32]  George J. Hochmuth,et al.  Yield and petiole-sap nitrate levels of tomato with N rates applied preplant or fertigated , 1996 .

[33]  Rafael Muñoz-Carpena,et al.  Monitoring of nitrate leaching in sandy soils: comparison of three methods. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[34]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  EFFECT OF SENSOR-BASED HIGH FREQUENCY IRRIGATION ON BELL PEPPER YIELD AND WATER USE , 2003 .

[35]  P. S. Brahmanand,et al.  Fertigation studies and irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system in tomato crop (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) , 2003 .