Monitoring pilot "Situation Awareness"

Pilot error remains the major cause of aircraft accidents. The lack of Situation Awareness SA, even amongst experienced pilots, is one of the primary reasons for pilot error. It is important to ensure that pilots are able to maintain a high level of SA before they act as members of a flight crew. A pilot's SA can be assessed by monitoring pilot behavior using observations of pilot eye movement. In this paper we discuss a rule-based approach to assess novice pilots' SA against a baseline. A recent experiment confirmed there is a measurable difference between the eye movement of an experienced pilot and the eye movement of several novice pilots. Initially, an expert pilot's eye movement was recorded using an eye tracker device in order to set the baseline. A Gaze Analyzer was used to derive relevant information from eye movement data. After consulting a Subject Matter Expert SME, a rule-based system was created to monitor the pilot's behavior. The data was analyzed to identify behavioral patterns in order to associate the pilots' level of SA with their mode of attention distribution fixation. Novice pilot's eye movement data was compared with an expert pilot's eye movement data using an inference engine.

[1]  M R Endsley SITUATION AWARENESS IN AVIATION SYSTEMS. IN: HANDBOOK OF AVIATION HUMAN FACTORS , 1999 .

[2]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[3]  Michael Negnevitsky,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Guide to Intelligent Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Rashaad E. T. Jones,et al.  Modeling Situation Awareness for Army Infantry Platoon Leaders Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping Techniques , 2010 .

[5]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and scene perception. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[6]  J Kirkland,et al.  Glance, Look, Gaze, and Stare: A Vocabulary for Eye-Fixation Research , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  Nadir Weibel,et al.  Let's look at the cockpit: exploring mobile eye-tracking for observational research on the flight deck , 2012, ETRA.

[8]  Thomas Prevot,et al.  The cockpit assistant system cassy - design and in-flight evaluation , 1995 .

[9]  M. Endsley Situation Awareness In Aviation Systems , 1999 .

[10]  S. Thatcher Reducing Aircraft Accidents: Can Intelligent Agent Paradigms Help? , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering.

[11]  M R Endsley,et al.  Sources of situation awareness errors in aviation. , 1996, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[12]  P. Ellsworth,et al.  The stare as a stimulus to flight in human subjects: a series of field experiments. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Douglas B. Lenat,et al.  Knowledge-based systems in artificial intelligence , 1981 .

[14]  Miles A. Tinker,et al.  The fixational pause of the eyes , 1939 .

[15]  Kavyaganga Kilingaru,et al.  Intelligent Monitoring of Flight Crew Situation Awareness , 2012 .

[16]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Distribution of Attention, Situation Awareness and Workload in a Passive Air Traffic Control Task: Implications for Operational Errors and Automation , 1998 .

[17]  Reiner Onken,et al.  The Crew Assistant Military Aircraft (CAMA) , 1997, HCI.

[18]  Lakhmi C. Jain,et al.  An Intelligent Aircraft Landing Support System , 2004, KES.

[19]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  Multi-agent situation awareness error evolution in accident risk modelling , 2003 .

[20]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[21]  Reiner Onken,et al.  Intent and error recognition as part of a knowledge-based cockpit assistant , 1998, Defense, Security, and Sensing.