In situ sulphate stimulation of mercury methylation in a boreal peatland: Toward a link between acid rain and methylmercury contamination in remote environments

Recent studies have found that “pristine” peatlands have high peat and pore water methylmercury (MeHg) concentrations and that peatlands may act as large sources of MeHg to the downstream aquatic system, depending upon the degree of hydrologie connectivity and catchment physiography. Sulphate-reducing bacteria have been implicated as principal methylators of inorganic mercury in many environments with previous research focused primarily on mercury methylation in aquatic sediments. Experiments in a poor fen in the Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario, Canada, demonstrated that the in situ addition of sulphate to peat and peat pore water resulted in a significant increase in pore water MeHg concentrations. As peatlands cover a large area of the Northern Hemisphere, this finding has potentially far ranging implications for the global mercury cycle, particularly in areas impacted by anthropogenically derived sulphate where the methylmercury fraction of total mercury species may be much larger than in nonimpacted environments.

[1]  Nigel T. Roulet,et al.  The baseflow and storm flow hydrology of a precambrian shield headwater peatland , 1998 .

[2]  R. Bartha,et al.  Methylation and demethylation of mercury under controlled redox, pH and salinity conditions , 1984, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[3]  K. Devito,et al.  SULPHATE DYNAMICS IN RELATION TO GROUNDWATER–SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS IN HEADWATER WETLANDS OF THE SOUTHERN CANADIAN SHIELD , 1997 .

[4]  G. A. Gill,et al.  Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the northern Everglades , 1998 .

[5]  J. Rudd,et al.  Production and Loss of Methylmercury and Loss of Total Mercury from Boreal Forest Catchments Containing Different Types of Wetlands , 1996 .

[6]  R. Bartha,et al.  Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: Principal Methylators of Mercury in Anoxic Estuarine Sediment , 1985, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[7]  Martin M. Shafer,et al.  Influences of watershed characteristics on mercury levels in wisconsin rivers. , 1995, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Ralph Mitchell,et al.  Sulfate stimulation of mercury methylation in freshwater sediments , 1992 .

[9]  J. Rudd,et al.  Importance of Wetlands as Sources of Methyl Mercury to Boreal Forest Ecosystems , 1994 .

[10]  D. Schindler,et al.  Atmospheric deposition of nutrients and major ions at the Experimental Lakes Area in northwestern Ontario, 1970 to 1982 , 1987 .

[11]  A. Heyes,et al.  The hydrology and methylmercury dynamics of a Precambrian shield headwater peatland , 1996 .

[12]  R. Bartha,et al.  Environmental factors affecting mercury methylation in estuarine sediments , 1994, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[13]  M. Winfrey,et al.  Depth profile of sulfate-reducing bacterial ribosomal RNA and mercury methylation in an estuarine sediment , 1996 .

[14]  R. Bartha,et al.  Control of the Methylation process in a mercury-polluted aquatic sediment , 1986 .

[15]  J. Rudd.  Sources of methyl mercury to freshwater ecosystems: A review , 1995 .

[16]  Andrew Heyes,et al.  Sulfide Controls on Mercury Speciation and Bioavailability to Methylating Bacteria in Sediment Pore Waters , 1999 .

[17]  B. Branfireun,et al.  Sinks and sources of methylmercury in a boreal catchment , 1998 .

[18]  M. Winfrey,et al.  Environmental factors affecting the formation of methylmercury in low pH lakes , 1990 .

[19]  E. A. Henry,et al.  Mercury methylation in aquatic systems affected by acid deposition. , 1991, Environmental pollution.

[20]  J. Benoit,et al.  Mercury cycling and effects in freshwater wetland ecosystems , 1993 .

[21]  Nicolas S. Bloom,et al.  On the Chemical Form of Mercury in Edible Fish and Marine Invertebrate Tissue , 1992 .