Knowledge Production in Urban Governance Systems through Qualitative Geographical Information Systems (GIS)

Urban governance offers opportunities for more inclusive urban management, incorporating tacit knowledge and citizens’ preferences. The question is how to elicit such knowledge and preferences so that they are both inclusive as well as efficient. Field visits to Indian cities have shown that a lot of effort is put into the implementation of E-governance tools and setting up Geographic Information Systems (GIS), focusing on administrative interaction with citizens. Little attention is paid to how GIS could be included in strategic governance processes. The main question here is how a combination of GIS-based qualitative and quantitative approaches can make local embedded knowledge visible for inclusive urban governance. Therefore workshops were held in four Indian cities (Mysore, Hubli–Dharward, Kalyan and Mira–Bhayandar) with participants from local government departments and elected councillors to elicit and discuss local knowledge on urban inequalities. GIS maps were used as an input to the process and for visualizing outcomes. The workshops show that using GIS throughout the process provides an understanding of the local context, enriches knowledge obtained from local databases, and therefore supports multiple forms of knowledge. However, the outcome depends greatly on the nature of input maps, the situated knowledge of workshop participants and map literacy.

[1]  K. Pfeffer,et al.  Mapping Urban Poverty for Local Governance in an Indian Mega-City: The Case of Delhi , 2008 .

[2]  C. Dunn Participatory GIS — a people's GIS? , 2007 .

[3]  M. McCall,et al.  Assessing participatory GIS for community-based natural resource management: claiming community forests in Cameroon , 2005 .

[4]  Javier Martinez,et al.  The use of GIS and indicators to monitor intra-urban inequalities. A case study in Rosario, Argentina , 2009 .

[5]  J. J. Verplanke,et al.  Variability of Quality of Life at Small Scales: Addis Ababa, Kirkos Sub-City , 2009, Social indicators research.

[6]  Carsten Jürgens,et al.  Remote sensing of urban and suburban areas , 2010 .

[7]  R. Chambers Participatory Mapping and Geographic Information Systems: Whose Map? Who is Empowered and Who Disempowered? Who Gains and Who Loses? , 2006, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[8]  Satish K. Puri,et al.  Integrating Scientific with Indigenous Knowledge: Constructing Knowledge Alliances for Land Management in India , 2007, MIS Q..

[9]  Gianluca Miscione,et al.  Citizen Surveillance of the State: A Mirror for eGovernment? , 2010, HCC.

[10]  Meghan Cope,et al.  Grounded Visualization: Integrating the Analysis of Qualitative and Quantitative Data through Grounded Theory and Visualization , 2006 .

[11]  M. Cope,et al.  6 Grounded Visualization and Scale: A Recursive Analysis of Community Spaces , 2009 .

[12]  Isa Baud,et al.  Partnerships between Dutch municipalities and municipalities in countries of migration to the Netherlands; knowledge exchange and mutuality , 2009 .

[13]  Pratima Joshi,et al.  Experiences with surveying and mapping Pune and Sangli slums on a geographical information system (GIS) , 2002 .

[14]  Axel Drescher,et al.  Facilitating participatory multilevel decision-making by using interactive mental maps. , 2008, Geospatial health.

[15]  Monika Kuffer,et al.  Understanding heterogeneity in metropolitan India: The added value of remote sensing data for analyzing sub-standard residential areas , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[16]  Karin Pfeffer,et al.  Matching deprivation mapping to urban governance in three Indian mega-cities , 2009 .

[17]  J. Martínez-Martín,et al.  Monitoring intra-urban inequalities with GIS-based indicators : With a case study in Rosario, Argentina , 2005 .

[18]  Steve Cinderby,et al.  How to reach the ‘hard-to-reach’: the development of Participatory Geographic Information Systems (P-GIS) for inclusive urban design in UK cities , 2010 .

[19]  J. Alborsa,et al.  New learning network paradigms: Communities of objectives, crowdsourcing, wikis and open source , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[20]  Philip Barker,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2009 .

[21]  R. V. Sliuzas,et al.  Managing Informal Settlements : A Study Using Geo-Information in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania , 1999 .

[22]  Gianluca Miscione,et al.  Enlisting SDI for urban planning in India: local practices in the case of slum declaration , 2011 .

[23]  S. Elwood Geographic information science: emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web , 2010 .

[24]  S. Elwood,et al.  Qualitative GIS: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2009 .

[25]  I. Baud,et al.  New forms of urban governance in India: shifts, models, networks and contestations , 2008 .

[26]  Lorlene Hoyt,et al.  Leaves, Pebbles, and Chalk: Building a Public Participation GIS in New Delhi, India , 2005 .

[27]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[28]  Axel Bruns,et al.  Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage , 2008 .

[29]  G. Ding,et al.  Geo-Narrative: Extending Geographic Information Systems for Narrative Analysis in Qualitative and Mixed-Method Research , 2008 .

[30]  Monika Kuffer,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Nature of Urban Objects , 2010 .

[31]  G. Peters Guarin,et al.  Integrating local knowledge into GIS based flood risk assessment, Naga city, The Philippines , 2008 .

[32]  M. Hordijk Peru's participatory budgeting: configurations of power, opportunities for change , 2009 .

[33]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[34]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[35]  Sundeep Sahay,et al.  Role of ICTs in participatory development: An Indian experience , 2007 .

[36]  M. Goodchild Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography , 2007 .