Partnership Diversity and Governance Culture: Evidence from Urban Regeneration Policies in Portugal

Debates on urban regeneration highlight the processes of mobilisation of public and private agents and the diversity of models of partnership. This paper focuses on the relationship between the diversity of partnerships and the processes of institutional change, and discusses the role played by governance culture. By looking at the case of Portugal, it explores a plurality of episodes of policy experimentation and actor—network practices. The results show that it is difficult to build general transformative processes when using specific innovative experiences as a basis. Sectoral institutional agendas and practices make it difficult to establish enduring processes of ‘cross-fertilisation’ for institutional and policy learning and innovation. Governance culture has a constraining influence. In such a context, the issue of the fragmentation of urban policy becomes crucial and the role of an urban policy that establishes the conditions in which innovation can occur seems to be particularly relevant.

[1]  I. Breda-Vázquez,et al.  Coalition-building in Portuguese Spatial Planning: Is There a Southern European Context? , 2008 .

[2]  Yuri Kazepov,et al.  Cities of Europe: changing contexts, local arrangements, and the challenge to urban cohesion , 2008 .

[3]  P. Galès.  Elusive Urban Policies in Europe , 2008 .

[4]  P. Healey.  Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times , 2006 .

[5]  E. Gualini.  The rescaling of governance in Europe: New spatial and institutional rationales , 2006 .

[6]  Patsy Healey,et al.  Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space1 , 2006 .

[7]  Uta Hohn,et al.  New urban governance: Institutional change and consequences for urban development , 2006 .

[8]  Heikki Lehtonen,et al.  THE VARIETY OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN WELFARE STATE REGIMES – A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 21 COUNTRIES , 2006 .

[9]  Carlos Nunes Silva,et al.  Governing Lisbon: evolving forms of city governance , 2006 .

[10]  P. Healey,et al.  A Sociological Institutionalist Approach to the Study of Innovation in Governance Capacity , 2005 .

[11]  E. Swyngedouw.  Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State , 2005 .

[12]  I. Tosics,et al.  URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN POLICY , 2005 .

[13]  Frank Moulaert,et al.  The Globalized City: Economic Restructuring and Social Polarization in European Cities , 2005 .

[14]  J. Davies,et al.  Conjuncture or Disjuncture? An Institutionalist Analysis of Local Regeneration Partnerships in the UK , 2004 .

[15]  G. Stoker.  Transforming Local Governance , 2003, Government Beyond the Centre.

[16]  Jon Coaffee,et al.  'My Voice: My Place': Tracking Transformations in Urban Governance , 2003 .

[17]  J. Davies,et al.  Partnerships versus Regimes: Why Regime Theory Cannot Explain Urban Coalitions in the Uk , 2003 .

[18]  Rob Imrie,et al.  Urban renaissance? : New Labour, community and urban policy , 2003 .

[19]  Chris Couch,et al.  Urban regeneration in Europe , 2003 .

[20]  Elizabeth Strom,et al.  Comparative Urban Governance , 2003 .

[21]  J. Diamond.  Managing Change or Coping with Conflict? - Mapping the Experience of a Local Regeneration Partnership , 2001 .

[22]  M. Geddes,et al.  Tackling Social Exclusion in the European Union? The Limits to the New Orthodoxy of Local Partnership , 2000 .

[23]  M. Carley.  Urban Partnerships, Governance and the Regeneration of Britain's Cities , 2000 .

[24]  Ioannis Chorianopoulos.  Urban Restructuring and Governance: North-South Differences in Europe and the EU URBAN Initiative , 2000 .

[25]  A. Kearns,et al.  Social Cohesion and Multilevel Urban Governance , 2000 .

[26]  Ronan Paddison,et al.  New Challenges for Urban Governance , 2000 .

[27]  A. Kearns,et al.  Power, Responsibility, and Governance in Britain’S New Urban Policy , 2000 .

[28]  Jon Pierre,et al.  Models of Urban Governance , 1999 .

[29]  Rob Atkinson,et al.  Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration , 1999 .

[30]  S. Syrett.  The Politics of Partnership , 1997 .

[31]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[32]  A. Hastings,et al.  Unravelling the Process of 'Partnership' in Urban Regeneration Policy , 1996 .

[33]  P. L. Galès.  Du gouvernement des villes à la gouvernance urbaine , 1995, Revue française de science politique.

[34]  A. Harding,et al.  The Rise of Urban Growth Coalitions, UK-Style? , 1991 .

[35]  Maurice Blanc,et al.  Partnerships and Democracy: A Happy Couple in Urban Governance? , 2019, Governing European Cities.

[36]  P. Roberts,et al.  Strategy and Partnership in Urban Regeneration , 2008 .

[37]  S. Mangen.  Social Exclusion and Inner City Europe: Regulating Urban Regeneration , 2004 .

[38]  J. Pierre.  Partnerships in Urban Governance , 1998 .

[39]  B. Guy Peters,et al.  ‘With a Little Help From Our Friends’: Public-Private Partnerships as Institutions and Instruments , 1998 .