论文信息 - There are neither "king" nor "crown" in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed "alternative" method of normalization - 字舞流文

There are neither "king" nor "crown" in scientometrics: Comments on a supposed "alternative" method of normalization

Vincent Larivière | Yves Gingras | Y. Gingras | V. Larivière

[1] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis , 2010, Scientometrics.

[2] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[3] Jos A. E. Spaan. The danger of pseudoscience in Informetrics , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[4] H. Moed. CWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group's publication oeuvre , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[5] Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al. Rivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and Leydesdorff , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[6] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS ("Leiden") evaluations of research performance , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[7] Lutz Bornmann,et al. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[8] Jonas Lundberg,et al. Lifting the crown - citation z-score , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[9] Henk F. Moed,et al. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation , 1899 .