Post-determined emotion: motor action retrospectively modulates emotional valence of visual images

Upward and downward motor actions influence subsequent and ongoing emotional processing in accordance with a space–valence metaphor: positive is up/negative is down. In this study, we examined whether upward and downward motor actions could also affect previous emotional processing. Participants were shown an emotional image on a touch screen. After the image disappeared, they were required to drag a centrally located dot towards a cued area, which was either in the upper or lower portion of the screen. They were then asked to rate the emotional valence of the image using a 7-point scale. We found that the emotional valence of the image was more positive when the cued area was located in the upper portion of the screen. However, this was the case only when the dragging action was required immediately after the image had disappeared. Our findings suggest that when somatic information that is metaphorically associated with an emotion is linked temporally with a visual event, retrospective emotional integration between the visual and somatic events occurs.

[1]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Updating and the Flash-Lag Effect , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  J. Bargh,et al.  Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth , 2008, Science.

[3]  P. Lang.  International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[4]  A. Woods,et al.  Context Modulates the Contribution of Time and Space in Causal Inference , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[5]  F. Strack,et al.  Proprioceptive Determinants of Emotional and Nonemotional Feelings , 1993 .

[6]  Sieu K. Khuu,et al.  Apparent motion distorts the shape of a stimulus briefly presented along the motion path. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[7]  Noriaki Kanayama,et al.  “Cutaneous Rabbit” Hops Toward a Light: Unimodal and Cross-Modal Causality on the Skin , 2012, Frontiers in psychology.

[8]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Why the Sunny Side Is Up , 2004, Psychological science.

[9]  L. Barsalou.  Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Visual illusion induced by sound. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  Takahiro Kawabe,et al.  Vection modulates emotional valence of autobiographical episodic memories , 2013, Cognition.

[12]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[13]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  Takahiro Kawabe.  Postdictive Modulation of Visual Orientation , 2012, PloS one.

[15]  F. A. Geldard,et al.  The Cutaneous "Rabbit": A Perceptual Illusion , 1972, Science.

[16]  Emily Balcetis,et al.  See what you want to see: motivational influences on visual perception. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  J. Vroomen,et al.  The perception of emotions by ear and by eye , 2000 .

[18]  S E Hall,et al.  Auditory saltation: a new measure for an old illusion. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  T. A. Ryan,et al.  Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics. , 1960, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  P. Niedenthal.  Embodying Emotion , 2007, Science.

[21]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Different Bodies, Different Minds , 2011 .

[22]  F. Marmolejo-Ramos,et al.  Appraisal of Space Words and Allocation of Emotion Words in Bodily Space , 2013, PloS one.

[23]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[24]  Beatrice de Gelder,et al.  I Feel Your Voice , 2010, Psychological science.

[25]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  Johan Wessberg,et al.  In touch with your emotions: Oxytocin and touch change social impressions while others’ facial expressions can alter touch , 2014, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[27]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: General © 2009 American Psychological Association , 2022 .

[28]  J. Hupé,et al.  The time windows of the sense of agency , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  Masaya Hirashima,et al.  The “Cutaneous Rabbit” Hopping out of the Body , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Emotion simulation during language comprehension , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Ana B. Chica,et al.  Attentional Routes to Conscious Perception , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[32]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Touch-induced visual illusion , 2005, Neuroreport.

[33]  Takahiro Kawabe.  Nonretinotopic processing is related to postdictive size modulation in apparent motion , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[34]  D. Casasanto,et al.  Motor action and emotional memory , 2010, Cognition.

[35]  Chaz Firestone,et al.  " Top-down " Effects Where None Should Be Found: the El Greco Fallacy in Perception Research , 2022 .

[36]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Localizing Non-Retinotopically Moving Objects , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Illusions: What you see is what you hear , 2000, Nature.

[38]  T J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. , 2000, Science.

[39]  Tal Makovski,et al.  The visual attractor illusion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[40]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Embodiment in Attitudes, Social Perception, and Emotion , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[41]  G. Horstmann.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Tone‐affect Compatibility with Affective Stimuli and Affective Responses , 2022 .