A Measure of Concurrent Neural Firing Activity Based on Mutual Information

Multiple methods have been developed in an attempt to quantify stimulus-induced neural coordination and to understand internal coordination of neuronal responses by examining the synchronization phenomena in neural discharge patterns. In this work we propose a novel approach to estimate the degree of concomitant firing between two neural units, based on a modified form of mutual information (MI) applied to a two-state representation of the firing activity. The binary profile of each single unit unfolds its discharge activity in time by decomposition into the state of neural quiescence/low activity and state of moderate firing/bursting. Then, the MI computed between the two binary streams is normalized by their minimum entropy and is taken as positive or negative depending on the prevalence of identical or opposite concomitant states. The resulting measure, denoted as Concurrent Firing Index based on MI (CFIMI), relies on a single input parameter and is otherwise assumption-free and symmetric. Exhaustive validation was carried out through controlled experiments in three simulation scenarios, showing that CFIMI is independent on firing rate and recording duration, and is sensitive to correlated and anti-correlated firing patterns. Its ability to detect non-correlated activity was assessed using ad-hoc surrogate data. Moreover, the evaluation of CFIMI on experimental recordings of spiking activity in retinal ganglion cells brought insights into the changes of neural synchrony over time. The proposed measure offers a novel perspective on the estimation of neural synchrony, providing information on the co-occurrence of firing states in the two analyzed trains over longer temporal scales compared to existing measures.

[1]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  The Structure of Multi-Neuron Firing Patterns in Primate Retina , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Riccardo Storchi,et al.  Melanopsin Contributions to the Representation of Images in the Early Visual System , 2017, Current Biology.

[3]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Redundancy in the Population Code of the Retina , 2005, Neuron.

[4]  L. L. Bologna,et al.  Self-organization and neuronal avalanches in networks of dissociated cortical neurons , 2008, Neuroscience.

[5]  C. Finney,et al.  A review of symbolic analysis of experimental data , 2003 .

[6]  R. Kass,et al.  Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  M. Crair,et al.  An Instructive Role for Patterned Spontaneous Retinal Activity in Mouse Visual Map Development , 2011, Neuron.

[8]  Ana L. N. Fred,et al.  A New Cluster Isolation Criterion Based on Dissimilarity Increments , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Iman H. Brivanlou,et al.  Mechanisms of Concerted Firing among Retinal Ganglion Cells , 1998, Neuron.

[10]  Luca Faes,et al.  Information – theoretic characterization of concurrent activity of neural spike trains , 2021, 2020 28th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO).

[11]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[12]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[13]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Weak pairwise correlations imply strongly correlated network states in a neural population , 2005, Nature.

[14]  Kamran Diba,et al.  Activity dynamics and behavioral correlates of CA3 and CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons , 2012, Hippocampus.

[15]  Alessio Perinelli,et al.  Generation of surrogate event sequences via joint distribution of successive inter-event intervals. , 2019, Chaos.

[16]  A. Porta,et al.  Symbolic Dynamics of Heart Rate Variability: A Probe to Investigate Cardiac Autonomic Modulation , 2005, Circulation.

[17]  D. Baylor,et al.  Concerted Signaling by Retinal Ganglion Cells , 1995, Science.

[18]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations? , 1999, Neuron.

[19]  Daniel Kerschensteiner,et al.  A Precisely Timed Asynchronous Pattern of ON and OFF Retinal Ganglion Cell Activity during Propagation of Retinal Waves , 2008, Neuron.

[20]  Thomas Kreuz,et al.  SPIKY: a graphical user interface for monitoring spike train synchrony , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  Multineuronal Firing Patterns in the Signal from Eye to Brain , 2003, Neuron.

[22]  A. Pérez-Villalba Rhythms of the Brain, G. Buzsáki. Oxford University Press, Madison Avenue, New York (2006), Price: GB £42.00, p. 448, ISBN: 0-19-530106-4 , 2008 .

[23]  Niels Wessel,et al.  Enhancing dynamical signatures of complex systems through symbolic computation , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  Wentian Li Mutual information functions versus correlation functions , 1990 .

[25]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Detecting dependence between marks and locations of marked point processes , 2004 .

[26]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in Population Codes , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Ostojic Interspike interval distributions of spiking neurons driven by fluctuating inputs. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Jonathon Shlens,et al.  Synchronized firing in the retina , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[29]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Coding Efficiency of Fly Motion Processing Is Set by Firing Rate, Not Firing Precision , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  Paul C. Shields,et al.  The Maximum Mutual Information between Two Random Processes , 1977, Inf. Control..

[31]  Marius Usher,et al.  Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception , 1998, Nature.

[32]  R. Reid,et al.  Synchronous activity in the visual system. , 1999, Annual review of physiology.

[33]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Rapid Neural Coding in the Retina with Relative Spike Latencies , 2008, Science.

[34]  Jan Grewe,et al.  Synchronous spikes are necessary but not sufficient for a synchrony code in populations of spiking neurons , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  R. Gray Entropy and Information Theory , 1990, Springer New York.

[36]  Rasmus S. Petersen,et al.  Photoreceptive retinal ganglion cells control the information rate of the optic nerve , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Jos J. Eggermont,et al.  Pair-Correlation in the Time and Frequency Domain , 2010 .

[38]  Kwoon Y. Wong,et al.  A Retinal Ganglion Cell That Can Signal Irradiance Continuously for 10 Hours , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  C. Shatz,et al.  Transient period of correlated bursting activity during development of the mammalian retina , 1993, Neuron.

[40]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Simple model of spiking neurons , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[41]  M. Tachibana,et al.  Synchronized retinal oscillations encode essential information for escape behavior in frogs , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Emmanuel Procyk,et al.  A novel approach to probabilistic characterisation of neural firing patterns , 2018, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[43]  D F Russell,et al.  Entropy and local uncertainty of data from sensory neurons. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[44]  Stephen J Eglen,et al.  Detecting Pairwise Correlations in Spike Trains: An Objective Comparison of Methods and Application to the Study of Retinal Waves , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  Satchidananda Panda,et al.  Melanopsin Contributions to Irradiance Coding in the Thalamo-Cortical Visual System , 2010, PLoS biology.

[46]  G. Ermentrout,et al.  Reliability, synchrony and noise , 2008, Trends in Neurosciences.

[47]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Neural excitability, Spiking and bursting , 2000, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.