Stroke rehabilitation: Australian patient profile and functional outcome.

A prospective, multi-institutional, population based study identified 1274 non-surgical stroke admissions to all hospitals in a major Australian city during 1984. The demographic and diagnostic profile and the nature of functional recovery of all 258 first stroke survivors who were referred for inpatient rehabilitation are presented. The median duration of rehabilitation stay was 49 days. The mean functional independence score, as measured on a modified Barthel Index at admission was 44, compared with 78 on discharge, a mean improvement of 34. Stair climbing had the lowest mean value on admission (12), while bowel control had the lowest residual deficit on discharge (95). The stroke study group was representative of the unimpaired aged population in all respects except ethnicity, where differences are attributed to age. The variables identified as significant are; side and severity of paralysis, age and sex, marital status and ethnicity. Stroke rehabilitation outcome was not influenced by etiology, site of lesion, arterial distribution, occupation or education.

[1]  M. Dombovy,et al.  Rehabilitation for stroke: a review. , 1986, Stroke.

[2]  Granger Cv,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  F. Vanclay,et al.  Predicting discharge status at commencement of stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Stroke.

[4]  V. Mills,et al.  Functional differences in patients with left or right cerebrovascular accidents. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[5]  K. Lind.  A synthesis of studies on stroke rehabilitation. , 1982, Journal of chronic diseases.

[6]  Christopher A. Bain,et al.  Admissions, patterns of utilization and disposition of cases of acute stroke in Brisbane hospitals , 1989, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  G. E. Gresham.  Stroke outcome research. , 1986, Stroke.

[8]  Waylonis Gw,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation in a Midwestern county. , 1973 .

[9]  B Cooper,et al.  Efficiency, effectiveness, and duration of stroke rehabilitation. , 1990, Stroke.

[10]  M. Johnston,et al.  RECOVERY FROM PHYSICAL DISABILITY AFTER STROKE: NORMAL PATTERNS AS A BASIS FOR EVALUATION , 1987, The Lancet.

[11]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation: Outcome and prediction. , 1975, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Stroke onset and rehabilitation: time lag as a factor in treatment outcome. , 1984, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  J. Nixon,et al.  Australian State‐specific reference data, by socioeconomic status, for the analysis of health and disease correlates , 1984, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  L. Jongbloed.  Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. , 1986, Stroke.

[15]  B Cooper,et al.  Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  E. Roth,et al.  Multivariate analysis of improvement and outcome following stroke rehabilitation. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[17]  PREVALENCE OF STROKE AND ITS SEQUELAE , 1981, The Medical journal of Australia.

[18]  C. Granger,et al.  The stroke rehabilitation outcome study--Part I: General description. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  R L Hewer,et al.  Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke. , 1983, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Bourestom Nc.  Predictors of long-term recovery in cerebrovascular disease. , 1967 .