Simple rules for targeting CO2 allowance allocations to compensate firms

Policies to cap emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), such as the recently announced agreement among seven northeastern states, are expected to have important effects on the electricity industry and on the market value of firms that own electricity generation assets. The economics literature finds large efficiency advantages for initial distribution of tradable emissions allowances through an auction so as to direct revenues to tax relief or other public investments. However, an auction raises the costs for the regulated firms. This paper identifies rules for an initial distribution that satisfy a compensation goal for firms that is achieved through free distribution of a portion of the allowances, while maximizing the value of allowances that can be directed to public purposes. The paper employs a detailed simulation model to calculate numerical results for the market value of generation assets under the CO2 cap-and-trade program in the northeastern United States.

[1]  Ranjit Bharvirkar,et al.  The Effect of Allowance Allocation on the Cost of Carbon Emission Trading , 2001 .

[2]  Bill Shaw,et al.  THE PUBLIC USE OF PRIVATE INTEREST , 1980 .

[3]  C. Schultze,et al.  The public use of the private interest , 1977 .

[4]  L. Goulder,et al.  Neutralizing the Adverse Industry Impacts of CO 2 Abatement Policies : What Does It Cost ? , 2000 .

[5]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  Allocation of CO2 Emissions Allowances in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program , 2005 .

[6]  C. Fischer,et al.  Combining rate-based and cap-and-trade emissions policies , 2003 .

[7]  L. Goulder,et al.  When Can Carbon Abatement Policies Increase Welfare? The Fundamental Role of Distorted Factor Markets , 1996 .

[8]  Ian W. H. Parry,et al.  Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling , 1995 .

[9]  Ranjit Bharvirkar,et al.  The Effect on Asset Values of the Allocation of Carbon Dioxide Emission Allowances , 2002 .

[10]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Instruments for Environmental Protection in a Second-Best Setting , 1998 .

[11]  K. Palmer,et al.  The Impact of Long-Term Generation Contracts on Valuation of Electricity Generating Assets under the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative , 2005 .

[12]  A. Polinsky Probabilistic Compensation Criteria , 1972 .

[13]  L. Goulder,et al.  Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses , 1994 .

[14]  T. Sterner,et al.  Output and abatement effects of allocation readjustment in permit trade , 2008 .

[15]  Alan K. Fox,et al.  Output-Based Allocations of Emissions Permits: Efficiency and Distributional Effects in a General Equilibrium Setting with Taxes and Trade , 2004 .

[16]  W. Lise,et al.  CO 2 price dynamics: The implications of EU emissions trading for the price of electricity , 2005 .

[17]  J. M. Buchanan The Coase Theorem and the Theory of the State , 1973 .

[18]  Dallas Burtraw,et al.  CO2 Allowance Allocation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and the Effect on Electricity Investors , 2006 .

[19]  I. Parry Fiscal Interactions and the Costs of Controlling Pollution from Electricity , 2004 .

[20]  R. Mooij,et al.  Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation. , 1994 .