More Than Method?: A Discussion of Paradigm Differences Within Mixed Methods Research

This article challenges the idea that mixed methods research (MMR) constitutes a coherent research paradigm and explores how different research paradigms exist within MMR. Tracing paradigmatic differences at the level of methods, ontology, and epistemology, two MMR strategies are discussed: nested analysis, recently presented by the American political scientist Evan S. Lieberman, and praxeological knowledge, inspired by the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. These strategies address two different epistemological problems, namely, the problem of causal inference and the problem of double hermeneutics. Consequently, the research designs as well as the understandings of the “qualitative component” differ noticeably. Realizing such differences at the ontological, epistemological, and methodological level contributes to discussions on how to move forward MMR, embracing differences instead of imposing homogeneity.

[1]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[2]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  A typology of mixed methods research designs , 2009 .

[3]  Elliot B. Weininger.  Class and causation in bourdieu , 2002 .

[4]  David J. Will.  A realist theory of science , 1981, Medical History.

[5]  P. Bourdieu.  The State Nobility , 1996 .

[6]  C. Whitbeck,et al.  A Realist Theory of Science. , 1977 .

[7]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology , 2010 .

[8]  Jim Briggs,et al.  A Pragmatist Argument for Mixed Methodology in Medical Informatics , 2009 .

[9]  J. Maxwell.  Using Qualitative Methods for Causal Explanation , 2004 .

[10]  H. Rouanet,et al.  The Geometric Analysis of Questionnaires: the Lesson of Bourdieu's La Distinction , 2000 .

[11]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  The three forms of theoretical knowledge , 1973 .

[12]  A. Moravcsik.  The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht , 1998 .

[13]  P. Holland.  Statistics and Causal Inference , 1985 .

[14]  J. Maxwell.  Causal Explanation, Qualitative Research, and Scientific Inquiry in Education , 2004 .

[15]  Brynjulf Stige.  Beyond Objectivism and Relativism? , 2001 .

[16]  Gaston Bachelard,et al.  The philosophy of no : a philosophy of the new scientific mind , 1968 .

[17]  Colin Elman,et al.  Case Study Methods in the International Relations Subfield , 2007 .

[18]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Science of Science and Reflexivity , 2004 .

[19]  P. Machamer,et al.  Thinking about Mechanisms , 2000, Philosophy of Science.

[20]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[21]  Priscilla Parkhurst Ferguson,et al.  The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society , 1999 .

[22]  Leonard A. Steverson.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2005 .

[23]  T. Duddy,et al.  Wittgenstein and justice: on the significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for social and political thought , 1994 .

[24]  J. Whitney.  Case Study Research , 1999 .

[25]  F. Tönnies,et al.  Community and Society , 1988 .

[26]  J. Mahoney.  Clarifying Comparative-Historical Methodology , 2005 .

[27]  Rudolf A. Makkreel.  Dilthey, philosopher of the human studies , 1975 .

[28]  N. Tannenwald.  The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear Non-Use , 1999, International Organization.

[29]  Henry E. Brady.  Causation and Explanation in Social Science , 2008 .

[30]  M. Feilzer,et al.  Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm: , 2010 .

[31]  James D. Fearon,et al.  Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods , 2008 .

[32]  Graham Bell,et al.  A Comparative Method , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Richard Snyder,et al.  Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics , 2007 .

[34]  Andrew Sayer,et al.  Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach , 1984 .

[35]  Gary Goertz,et al.  A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research , 2006, Political Analysis.

[36]  E. Silva,et al.  Researching Cultural Capital: Complexities in Mixing Methods , 2008 .

[37]  David de Vaus,et al.  Research Design in Social Research , 2001 .

[38]  A. Bryman.  Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2006 .

[39]  John H. Hitchcock,et al.  An Inclusive Framework for Conceptualizing Mixed Methods Design Typologies: Moving Toward Fully Integrated Synergistic Research Models , 2010 .

[40]  Rodney W. Nichols.  The House of Science , 2001 .

[41]  M. Archer.  Being Human: The Problem of Agency , 2000 .

[42]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[43]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  A. George,et al.  Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences , 2005 .

[45]  Using Mixed Methods for Analysing Culture: The Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion Project , 2009 .

[46]  Alan Br Y Man.  Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done? , 2011 .

[47]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries , 1991 .

[48]  S. Glennan.  Mechanisms and the nature of causation , 1996 .

[49]  C. J. Fries,et al.  Bourdieu’s Reflexive Sociology as a Theoretical Basis for Mixed Methods Research , 2009 .

[50]  John W. Creswell,et al.  The mixed methods reader , 2008 .

[51]  Charles Teddlie,et al.  A Continuation of the Paradigm Wars? Prevalence Rates of Methodological Approaches Across the Social/Behavioral Sciences , 2010 .

[52]  Martina Yvonne Feilzer.  Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm , 2010 .

[53]  M. Savage,et al.  Culture, Class, Distinction , 2009 .

[54]  John W. Creswell,et al.  How Interpretive Qualitative Research Extends Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[55]  P. Heller.  Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[56]  Colin Elman,et al.  Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence , 2006, Political Analysis.

[57]  David Collier,et al.  Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology , 2004 .

[58]  Robert O. Keohane,et al.  Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. , 1995 .

[59]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Editorial: Differing Perspectives on Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[60]  Evan S. Lieberman,et al.  Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[61]  Michael O'Rourke,et al.  Causation and explanation , 2007 .

[62]  D. Collier,et al.  Insights and Pitfalls: Selection Bias in Qualitative Research , 1996, World Politics.

[63]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come , 2004 .

[64]  Visions of Comparative Politics , 2007 .

[65]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[66]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[67]  A. Harrington.  In Defence of Verstehen and Erkliren , 2000 .

[68]  Allen W. Wood,et al.  Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory , 1986 .

[69]  Stathis Psillos,et al.  Causation and Explanation , 2002 .

[70]  G. David Garson,et al.  Research Designs , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[71]  Ingo Rohlfing,et al.  What You See and What You Get , 2008 .

[72]  R. Bernstein.  Beyond objectivism and relativism , 1983 .

[73]  Yuen Foong Khong.  Analogies at War: Korea, Munich, Dien Bien Phu, and the Vietnam Decisions of 1965 , 1993 .

[74]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2008 .

[75]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry , 2007 .