Effect of stimulus contrast on performance and eye movements in visual search

According to the visual span control hypothesis, eye movements are controlled in relation to the size of visual span. In reading, the decrease of contrast reduces visual span, saccade sizes, and reading speed. The purpose of the present study is to determine how stimulus contrast affects the speed of two-dimensional visual search and how changes in eye movements and visual span could explain changes in performance. The task of the observer was to search for, and identify, an uppercase letter from a rectangular array of characters in which the other items were numerals. Threshold search time, i.e. the duration of stimulus presentation required for search that is successful with a given probability, was determined by using a multiple-alternative staircase method. Eye movements were recorded simultaneously by using a video eye tracker. Four different set sizes (the sizes of stimulus array) (3x3-10x10), and five different contrasts (0.0186-0.412) were used. At all set sizes, threshold search time decreased with increasing contrast. Also the average number of fixations per search decreased with increasing contrast. At the smallest set size (3x3), only one fixation was needed except at the lowest contrast. Average fixation duration decreased and saccade amplitudes increased slightly with increasing contrast. The reduction of the number of fixations with increasing contrast suggests that visual span, i.e. the area from which information can be collected at one fixation, increases with increasing contrast. The reduction of the number of fixations together with reduced fixation duration result in reduced search times when contrast increases.

[1]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The use of information below fixation in reading and in visual search. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[3]  K Rayner,et al.  Letter processing during eye fixations in visual search , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[5]  Gert Hauske,et al.  Perceptual latencies to sinusoidal gratings , 1976, Vision Research.

[6]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of suprathreshold grating detection , 1978, Vision Research.

[7]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[8]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Performance in simple visual search at threshold contrasts. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Control of fixation duration in a simple search task , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  W. Prinz.  Attention and sensitivity in visual search , 1984, Psychological research.

[11]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[14]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  The effect of visibility on eye-movement parameters in reading , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—V. The role of contrast in normal vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[16]  Milena Mihaylova,et al.  Peripheral and central delay in processing high spatial frequencies: reaction time and VEP latency studies , 1999, Vision Research.

[17]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Psychophysics of reading—XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision , 1997, Vision Research.

[18]  G. B. Wetherill,et al.  SEQUENTIAL ESTIMATION OF POINTS ON A PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION. , 1965, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .

[20]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The zone of focal attention during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[21]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Eye movements and the span of the effective stimulus in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[23]  J. Findlay,et al.  Eye guidance and visual search , 1998 .

[24]  A. Jacobs.  Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control? , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  K Rayner,et al.  Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  Jaj Jacques Roufs,et al.  Text quality metrics for visual display units:: I. Methodological aspects , 1997 .