A Four-Layer Model for IT Support of Knowledge Management

Strategies for knowledge management as well as strategies for ITsystems supporting knowledge management have often been conceived to serve one particular knowledge management paradigm. We argue that in practice there is not one paradigm that suits all needs of all organizations. Considering knowledge management as a measure to further communication in an organization we find that different ways of organizing communication exist some of which are not well supported by current IT-systems for knowledge management. In particular, we investigate two dimensions of communication, first, the vocabulary or knowledge structures used to organize, i.e. annotate, store and retrieve, the knowledge using means such as Semantic Web technology, second, the way of organizing access to the knowledge in a more or less distributed manner involving technologies like distributed databases, agentbased or peer-to-peer based systems. Based on these dimensions we overview existing knowledge sharing systems and elaborate on novel knowledge sharing models and tools. Thus, we derive a four layer model for IT support of knowledge management, where only one layer for centralized knowledge sharing is well understood, where the layers of individual and decentralized knowledge management are currently intensively researched and where the forth layer of evolutionary knowledge management is just appearing on current research agendas.

[1]  Peter Mika,et al.  Flink: Semantic Web technology for the extraction and analysis of social networks , 2005, J. Web Semant..

[2]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  Ontology Matching: A Machine Learning Approach , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[3]  Steffen Staab,et al.  SEmantic portAL: The SEAL Approach , 2003, Spinning the Semantic Web.

[4]  Ian T. Foster,et al.  On Death, Taxes, and the Convergence of Peer-to-Peer and Grid Computing , 2003, IPTPS.

[5]  Steffen Staab,et al.  SAM: Semantics Aware Instant Messaging for the Networked Semantic Desktop , 2005, Semantic Desktop Workshop.

[6]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Handbook on Ontologies , 2004, Künstliche Intell..

[7]  Cai-Nicolas Ziegler Investigating Correlations of Trust and Interest Similarity-Do Birds of a Feather Really Flock Together ? , 2005 .

[8]  Leo Sauermann,et al.  The Gnowsis Semantic Desktop for Information Integration , 2005, Wissensmanagement.

[9]  Luciano Serafini,et al.  Semantic Coordination: A New Approach and an Application , 2003, SEMWEB.

[10]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Social Networks Applied , 2005, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[11]  Steffen Staab,et al.  DILIGENT: Towards a fine-grained methodology for Distributed, Loosely-controlled and evolving Engineering of oNTologies , 2004, ECAI.

[12]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Towards Agent-Mediated Knowledge Management , 2003, AMKM.

[13]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment , 2000, AAAI/IAAI.

[14]  Steffen Staab,et al.  Ontology Learning , 2004, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[15]  Ami Marowka,et al.  The GRID: Blueprint for a New Computing Infrastructure , 2000, Parallel Distributed Comput. Pract..

[16]  Frank Dignum,et al.  The Knowledge Market: Agent-Mediated Knowledge Sharing , 2003, CEEMAS.

[17]  Matteo Bonifacio,et al.  Managing the KM Trade-Off: Knowledge Centralization versus Distribution , 2004, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[18]  E. Tsui Technologies for Personal and Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[19]  Francesco Palmieri,et al.  K-Trek: A Peer-to-Peer Approach to Distribute Knowledge in Large Environments , 2003, AP2PC.

[20]  David R. Karger,et al.  Haystack: a platform for creating, organizing and visualizing semistructured information , 2003, IUI '03.

[21]  Paolo Bouquet,et al.  KEEx: A Peer-to-Peer Solution for Distributed Knowledge Management , 2002, P2PKM.